Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The feasibility of introducing an adult safeguarding measure for inclusion in the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF): findings from a pilot study

Authors: Caroline Norrie, Jill Manthorpe, Cher Cartwright, Pritpal Rayat

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are currently no national measures in England reporting the experiences of people who have been involved with adult safeguarding services following concerns that they may be at risk of abuse or neglect. The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) aimed to develop a new adult safeguarding outcome measure (survey) for local authorities (LAs) that could be added to the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF). The ASCOF is a national collection of social care outcomes performance indicators collected from the perspective of people receiving partial or total funding from a LA for care services.

Methods

An outcome measure (a face-to-face interview based survey consisting of 7 questions) was piloted in 40 LAs with 382 adults at risk (or their representative) who had been the subject of a safeguarding investigation. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of the survey in three domains: i) if a statistically representative sample of adults at risk (or their family, friend, carer or advocate) could be recruited; ii) analysis of survey responses and its acceptability to participants iii) feedback from LAs about the survey’s administration.

Results and discussion

Overall the survey results met statistical confidence; however the individual results for adults at risk did not, due to the high proportion of representatives who responded because adults at risk were unable. Responses to the survey were generally positive; 72 % of participants felt that the help received during the safeguarding investigation had made them or the adult at risk (if reporting as a proxy) feel ‘quite a bit’ or ‘a lot safer’. These results are the most robust data collected in England on the perspectives of adults at risk and their representatives on safeguarding services. Participants reported they appreciated being asked for feedback. LAs suggested survey administration improvements.

Conclusions

This survey is one way LAs can meet their new legal requirement under the Care Act 2014 to ‘seek feedback’ from adults at risk about adult safeguarding services. The survey findings provide the first robust evidence that safeguarding services in the main meet their goals of promoting feelings of safety among adults at risk.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cambridge P, Beadle-Brown J, Milne A, Mansell J, Whelton B. Adult protection: the processes and outcomes of adult protection referrals in two English local authorities. J Soc Work. 2011;11:247–67.CrossRef Cambridge P, Beadle-Brown J, Milne A, Mansell J, Whelton B. Adult protection: the processes and outcomes of adult protection referrals in two English local authorities. J Soc Work. 2011;11:247–67.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fyson R, Kitson D. Outcomes following adult safeguarding alerts: a critical analysis of key factors. J Adult Protect. 2012;13:93–103.CrossRef Fyson R, Kitson D. Outcomes following adult safeguarding alerts: a critical analysis of key factors. J Adult Protect. 2012;13:93–103.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Graham K, Norrie C, Stevens M, Hussein S, Moriarty J, Manthorpe J. Models of adult safeguarding in England: a review of the literature. J Soc Work. 2014. Online November 7, 2014. Graham K, Norrie C, Stevens M, Hussein S, Moriarty J, Manthorpe J. Models of adult safeguarding in England: a review of the literature. J Soc Work. 2014. Online November 7, 2014.
4.
go back to reference Fyson R. Building an evidence base for adult safeguarding? Problems with the reliability and validity of adult safeguarding databases. Br J Soc Work. 2013. Online September 26, 2013. Fyson R. Building an evidence base for adult safeguarding? Problems with the reliability and validity of adult safeguarding databases. Br J Soc Work. 2013. Online September 26, 2013.
5.
go back to reference Cambridge P, Parkes T. The case for case management in adult protection. J Adult Protect. 2004;6:4–14.CrossRef Cambridge P, Parkes T. The case for case management in adult protection. J Adult Protect. 2004;6:4–14.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Thacker H. Safeguarding adults’ referrals in the Eastern region: an investigation into varying referral rates. J Adult Protect. 2011;13:137–49.CrossRef Thacker H. Safeguarding adults’ referrals in the Eastern region: an investigation into varying referral rates. J Adult Protect. 2011;13:137–49.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Local Government Association. Safeguarding Adults: Advice and Guidance to Directors of Adult Social Services. London: Local Government Association; 2013. Local Government Association. Safeguarding Adults: Advice and Guidance to Directors of Adult Social Services. London: Local Government Association; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Health and Social Care Information Centre. Measures from the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework, England 2013–14. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2012. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Measures from the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework, England 2013–14. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2012.
9.
go back to reference Department of Health. Transparency in outcomes: a framework for quality in adult social care. The 2011/12 Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework. London: Department of Health; 2011. Department of Health. Transparency in outcomes: a framework for quality in adult social care. The 2011/12 Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework. London: Department of Health; 2011.
10.
go back to reference Netten A. Overview of outcome measurement for adults using social care services and support. London: NIHR School for Social Care Research; 2011. Netten A. Overview of outcome measurement for adults using social care services and support. London: NIHR School for Social Care Research; 2011.
11.
go back to reference The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Personal Social Services Adult Social Care Survey, England, 2012–2013. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2013. The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Personal Social Services Adult Social Care Survey, England, 2012–2013. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2013.
12.
go back to reference Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Dickson K, Hargreaves K, Schucan-Bird K, Kwan I, et al. The adult social care outcomes framework: a systematic review of systematic reviews to support its use and development. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2012. Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Dickson K, Hargreaves K, Schucan-Bird K, Kwan I, et al. The adult social care outcomes framework: a systematic review of systematic reviews to support its use and development. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2012.
13.
go back to reference Department of Health and Home Office. No Secrets. Guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse. London: The Stationery Office; 2000. Department of Health and Home Office. No Secrets. Guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse. London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
14.
go back to reference Department of Health. Safeguarding Adults: a consultation on the review of the ‘No Secrets’ Guidance. London: Department of Health; 2008. Department of Health. Safeguarding Adults: a consultation on the review of the ‘No Secrets’ Guidance. London: Department of Health; 2008.
15.
go back to reference Law Commission. Reforming the law for Adult Social Care. London: Law Commission; 2012. Law Commission. Reforming the law for Adult Social Care. London: Law Commission; 2012.
16.
go back to reference Manthorpe J, Samsi K. Care Professionals’ understanding of the new criminal offences crated by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(4):384–92.CrossRefPubMed Manthorpe J, Samsi K. Care Professionals’ understanding of the new criminal offences crated by the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(4):384–92.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Department of Health. Caring for Our Future: reforming care and support. London: Department of Health; 2012. Department of Health. Caring for Our Future: reforming care and support. London: Department of Health; 2012.
18.
go back to reference Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry Executive summary. London: The Stationary Office; 2013. Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry Executive summary. London: The Stationary Office; 2013.
21.
go back to reference Manthorpe J, Klee D, Williams C, Cooper A. Making Safeguarding Personal: developing responses and enhancing skills. J Adult Protect. 2014;16:96–103.CrossRef Manthorpe J, Klee D, Williams C, Cooper A. Making Safeguarding Personal: developing responses and enhancing skills. J Adult Protect. 2014;16:96–103.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Evans CJ, Stone KA, Manthorpe J, Higginson IJ. Medical Research Council guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions: Application to research on palliative and end of life care. London: The NIHR School for Social Care Research; 2013. Evans CJ, Stone KA, Manthorpe J, Higginson IJ. Medical Research Council guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions: Application to research on palliative and end of life care. London: The NIHR School for Social Care Research; 2013.
23.
go back to reference Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council; 2000. p. 18. Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council; 2000. p. 18.
24.
go back to reference Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J. 2007;321:694–6. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J. 2007;321:694–6.
25.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Patticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Patticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wanless D. Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a Long-term View. London: The King’s Fund; 2006. Wanless D. Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a Long-term View. London: The King’s Fund; 2006.
27.
go back to reference Webber M. Connecting People Intervention. London: King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry; 2010. Webber M. Connecting People Intervention. London: King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry; 2010.
28.
go back to reference Norrie C, Cartwright C, Rayat P, Gray M, Manthorpe J. Developing an adult safeguarding outcome measure in England. J Adult Protect. 2015;17:275–86.CrossRef Norrie C, Cartwright C, Rayat P, Gray M, Manthorpe J. Developing an adult safeguarding outcome measure in England. J Adult Protect. 2015;17:275–86.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Norrie C, Manthorpe J, Cartwright C, Rayat P, Petrie D. The feasibility of introducing an adult safeguarding measure for inclusion in the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF): projecting costs. J Adult Protect. 2015;18:71-85. Norrie C, Manthorpe J, Cartwright C, Rayat P, Petrie D. The feasibility of introducing an adult safeguarding measure for inclusion in the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF): projecting costs. J Adult Protect. 2015;18:71-85.
30.
go back to reference Norrie C, Stevens M, Graham K, Moriarty J, Hussein S, Manthorpe J. The advantages and disadvantages of different models of organising adult safeguarding. Br J Soc Work. 2016. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw032. Norrie C, Stevens M, Graham K, Moriarty J, Hussein S, Manthorpe J. The advantages and disadvantages of different models of organising adult safeguarding. Br J Soc Work. 2016. doi:10.​1093/​bjsw/​bcw032.
Metadata
Title
The feasibility of introducing an adult safeguarding measure for inclusion in the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework (ASCOF): findings from a pilot study
Authors
Caroline Norrie
Jill Manthorpe
Cher Cartwright
Pritpal Rayat
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1464-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue