Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Developing a patient portal for haematology patients requires involvement of all stakeholders and a customised design, tailored to the individual needs

Authors: Paul A. F. Geerts, Trudy van der Weijden, Pien G. M. Loeffen, Lise E. F. Janssen, Celine Almekinders, Tobias A. Wienhold, Gerard M. J. Bos

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Electronic patient portals are increasingly being implemented, also in (haemato) oncology. However, portal usage is low and depends on user and provider engagement. We explored wishes, expectations and thoughts of patients with a haematologic malignancy and their physicians with regard to the electronic patient portal.

Methods

Based on insights from literature and a focus group discussion we built a 44-item questionnaire. This questionnaire was spread amongst patients with a haematologic malignancy at the outpatient clinic that was not yet exposed to patient portal facilities. Haematologists completed a questionnaire based on literature.

Results

Patients were interested in many different types of access to information and portal functionalities. However, their opinions varied about the provision of access to the portal to other people, the role of the physician, possibilities for communication via the portal and timing of access. The physicians acknowledged the relevance of the electronic patient portal, but had some worries about the patients’ autonomous information handling, organizational and technical issues. Patients frequently expressed to be open about the potential of the patient portal to orchestrate their care. Nevertheless, most physicians appreciated their supporting role towards the patient.

Conclusions

Patients and physicians appreciated the electronic patient portal. Both groups need to be involved in further portal development to improve engagement by meeting patients’ wishes, taking into account organizational and professional issues and managing expectations for both parties. To fit various patient profiles, portal design should be flexible and individualized. Further research should focus on the perceived added value and the impact on patient related outcome measures of portals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1172–9.CrossRef Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, De Haes JC. Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98:1172–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e44.CrossRef Kruse CS, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e44.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference de Lusignan S, Mold F, Sheikh A, et al. Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006021.CrossRef de Lusignan S, Mold F, Sheikh A, et al. Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006021.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Otte-Trojel T, de Bont A, Rundall TG, et al. What do we know about developing patient portals? A systematic literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:e162–8.CrossRef Otte-Trojel T, de Bont A, Rundall TG, et al. What do we know about developing patient portals? A systematic literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:e162–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Irizarry T, DeVito DA, Curran CR. Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e148.CrossRef Irizarry T, DeVito DA, Curran CR. Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e148.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Groen WG, Kuijpers W, Oldenburg HS, et al. Empowerment of Cancer survivors through information technology: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e270.CrossRef Groen WG, Kuijpers W, Oldenburg HS, et al. Empowerment of Cancer survivors through information technology: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e270.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Oldenburg HS, et al. eHealth for breast Cancer survivors: use, Feasibility and Impact of an Interactive Portal. JMIR Cancer. 2016;2:e3.CrossRef Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Oldenburg HS, et al. eHealth for breast Cancer survivors: use, Feasibility and Impact of an Interactive Portal. JMIR Cancer. 2016;2:e3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Groen WG, Kuijpers W, Oldenburg HS, et al. Supporting lung Cancer patients with an interactive patient portal: feasibility study. JMIR Cancer. 2017;3:e10.CrossRef Groen WG, Kuijpers W, Oldenburg HS, et al. Supporting lung Cancer patients with an interactive patient portal: feasibility study. JMIR Cancer. 2017;3:e10.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Blijlevens N. CMyLife: the road to a virtual oncological network. Nederlands Tijdschrift Hematol. 2016;13:198–201. Blijlevens N. CMyLife: the road to a virtual oncological network. Nederlands Tijdschrift Hematol. 2016;13:198–201.
11.
go back to reference Wiljer D, Bogomilsky S, Catton P, et al. Getting results for hematology patients through access to the electronic health record. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2006;16:154–8.CrossRef Wiljer D, Bogomilsky S, Catton P, et al. Getting results for hematology patients through access to the electronic health record. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2006;16:154–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Baudendistel I, Winkler E, Kamradt M, et al. The patients’ active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:2613–21.CrossRef Baudendistel I, Winkler E, Kamradt M, et al. The patients’ active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:2613–21.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Baudendistel I, Winkler E, Kamradt M, et al. Personal electronic health records: understanding user requirements and needs in chronic cancer care. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e121.CrossRef Baudendistel I, Winkler E, Kamradt M, et al. Personal electronic health records: understanding user requirements and needs in chronic cancer care. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e121.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Baudendistel I, Winkler EC, Kamradt M, et al. Cross-sectoral cancer care: views from patients and health care professionals regarding a personal electronic health record. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26:1–11.CrossRef Baudendistel I, Winkler EC, Kamradt M, et al. Cross-sectoral cancer care: views from patients and health care professionals regarding a personal electronic health record. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26:1–11.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Mixed methods procedures. In: Creswell JW, Creswell JD, editors. Research Design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, inc.; 2018. p. 213–26. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Mixed methods procedures. In: Creswell JW, Creswell JD, editors. Research Design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, inc.; 2018. p. 213–26.
16.
go back to reference Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–50.CrossRef Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–50.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kasper J, Heesen C, Kopke S, et al. Patients’ and observers’ perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26255.CrossRef Kasper J, Heesen C, Kopke S, et al. Patients’ and observers’ perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26255.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McNamara M, Arnold C, Sarma K, et al. Patient portal preferences: perspectives on imaging information. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;66:1606–15.CrossRef McNamara M, Arnold C, Sarma K, et al. Patient portal preferences: perspectives on imaging information. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;66:1606–15.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Loos R, et al. An interactive portal to empower cancer survivors: a qualitative study on user expectations. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:2535–42.CrossRef Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Loos R, et al. An interactive portal to empower cancer survivors: a qualitative study on user expectations. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:2535–42.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jilka SR, Callahan R, Sevdalis N, et al. “nothing about me without me”: an interpretative review of patient accessible electronic health records. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e161.CrossRef Jilka SR, Callahan R, Sevdalis N, et al. “nothing about me without me”: an interpretative review of patient accessible electronic health records. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e161.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gravis G, Protiere C, Eisinger F, et al. Full access to medical records does not modify anxiety in cancer patients: results of a randomized study. Cancer. 2011;117:4796–804.CrossRef Gravis G, Protiere C, Eisinger F, et al. Full access to medical records does not modify anxiety in cancer patients: results of a randomized study. Cancer. 2011;117:4796–804.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Verstraete E, Koehorst AM, van Os-Medendorp H. Is patient gebaat bij directe inzage in zijn dossier? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:1–6. Verstraete E, Koehorst AM, van Os-Medendorp H. Is patient gebaat bij directe inzage in zijn dossier? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:1–6.
23.
go back to reference Pai HH, Lau F, Barnett J, et al. Meeting the health information needs of prostate cancer patients using personal health records. Curr Oncol. 2013;20:e561–9.CrossRef Pai HH, Lau F, Barnett J, et al. Meeting the health information needs of prostate cancer patients using personal health records. Curr Oncol. 2013;20:e561–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gerber DE, Laccetti AL, Chen B, et al. Predictors and intensity of online access to electronic medical records among patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10:e307–e12.CrossRef Gerber DE, Laccetti AL, Chen B, et al. Predictors and intensity of online access to electronic medical records among patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10:e307–e12.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Laccetti AL, Chen B, Cai J, et al. Increase in Cancer center staff effort related to electronic patient portal use. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:e981–e90.CrossRef Laccetti AL, Chen B, Cai J, et al. Increase in Cancer center staff effort related to electronic patient portal use. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:e981–e90.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Carey M, Anderson A, Sanson-Fisher R, et al. How well are we meeting haematological cancer survivors’ preferences for involvement in treatment decision making? Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88:87–92.CrossRef Carey M, Anderson A, Sanson-Fisher R, et al. How well are we meeting haematological cancer survivors’ preferences for involvement in treatment decision making? Patient Educ Couns. 2012;88:87–92.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ernst J, Brahler E, Aldaoud A, et al. Desired and perceived participation in medical decision-making in patients with haemato-oncological diseases. Leuk Res. 2010;34:390–2.CrossRef Ernst J, Brahler E, Aldaoud A, et al. Desired and perceived participation in medical decision-making in patients with haemato-oncological diseases. Leuk Res. 2010;34:390–2.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Talaei-Khoei A, Lewis L, Talaei Khoei T, et al. Seniors’ perspective on perceived transfer effects of assistive robots in elderly care: capability approach analysis. In: International conference on information systems, Fort Worth, Texas; 2015. p. 1–14. Talaei-Khoei A, Lewis L, Talaei Khoei T, et al. Seniors’ perspective on perceived transfer effects of assistive robots in elderly care: capability approach analysis. In: International conference on information systems, Fort Worth, Texas; 2015. p. 1–14.
29.
go back to reference Robeyns I. The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J Hum Dev. 2005;6:93–117.CrossRef Robeyns I. The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J Hum Dev. 2005;6:93–117.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Developing a patient portal for haematology patients requires involvement of all stakeholders and a customised design, tailored to the individual needs
Authors
Paul A. F. Geerts
Trudy van der Weijden
Pien G. M. Loeffen
Lise E. F. Janssen
Celine Almekinders
Tobias A. Wienhold
Gerard M. J. Bos
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0868-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2019 Go to the issue