Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Barriers to exchanging healthcare information in inter-municipal healthcare services: a qualitative case study

Authors: Elisabeth Holen-Rabbersvik, Elin Thygesen, Tom Roar Eikebrokk, Rune Werner Fensli, Åshild Slettebø

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In recent years, inter-municipal cooperation in healthcare services has been an important measure implemented to meet future demographic changes in western countries. This entails an increased focus on communication and information sharing across organisational borders. Technology enables efficient and effective solutions to enhance such cooperation. However, the systems in the healthcare sector tend not to communicate with one another. There is a lack of literature focusing on communication and information sharing in inter-municipal healthcare services. The aim of this article is to investigate both the characteristics of communication and information sharing, and the factors that serve as barriers to communication and information sharing for employees in inter-municipal healthcare services.

Methods

In this study, a qualitative case study approach is used to investigate both characteristics of communication and information sharing, and factors enabling barriers to communication and information sharing for employees in newly established inter-municipal healthcare services. Data collection methods were individual interviews, focus group interviews, observation studies and a workshop. A total of 18 persons participated in the study. The interviews, observations and workshop were conducted over a period of ten months.

Results

Communication and information sharing practices were found to be complex and characterised by multiple actors, information types and a combination of multiple actions. Findings indicate that 1. IT capability and usability 2. Differences 3. Privacy, confidentiality and security and 4. Awareness are all factors enabling barriers to communication and information sharing in inter-municipal healthcare services. Specifically, these barriers were related to lack of EHR usability, inadequate workflow processes, digital systems incompatibility, the understanding of needs in different systems and knowledge and practices regarding privacy and confidentiality.

Conclusion

By focusing on the context of inter-municipal cooperation when assessing communication and information sharing in healthcare services, this article contributes to close a gap in existing knowledge. The perspective of the employees provides useful insight, and findings can be relevant for future theory development and for managers and policymakers in inter-municipal services.
Literature
1.
Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13(1):655–79.CrossRef
2.
MacIntosh J, McCormack D. Partnerships identified within primary health care literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38(5):547–55.CrossRef
3.
Hulst R, Montfort A. Inter-municipal cooperation: a widespread phenomenon. Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe; 2007. p. 1–21.
4.
Gil-Garcia JR, Helbig N, Ojo A: Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly. 2014;31:I1–I8.CrossRef
5.
Yang T-M, Maxwell TA. Information-sharing in public organizations: a literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Gov Inf Q. 2011;28(2):164–75.CrossRef
6.
7.
Holen-Rabbersvik E, Eikebrokk TR, Fensli RW, Thygesen E, Slettebo A. Important challenges for coordination and inter-municipal cooperation in health care services: a Delphi study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):451.CrossRef
8.
Thomson AM, Perry JL. Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66(s1):20–32.CrossRef
9.
Axelsson R, Axelsson SB. Integration and collaboration in public health—a conceptual framework. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2006;21(1):75–88.CrossRef
10.
Williamson OE. Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press; 1975.
11.
Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy. Sociol Organ: Class Contemp Crit Read. 2003;315:104–17.
12.
Miles RE, Snow CC. Causes of failure in network organizations. Calif Manag Rev. 1992;34(4):53–72.CrossRef
13.
Miles RE, Snow CC. Organizations: new concepts for new forms. Calif Manag Rev. 1986;28(3):62–73.CrossRef
14.
Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav. 1990;12:295–336.
15.
Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP. A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22(4):911–45.CrossRef
16.
Provan KG, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2008;18(2):229–52.CrossRef
17.
Huang K, Provan KG. Structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed mental health services network. Public Manag Rev. 2007;9(2):169–89.CrossRef
18.
O’Toole LJ Jr, Meier KJ. Public management in intergovernmental networks: matching structural networks and managerial networking. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2004;14(4):469–94.CrossRef
19.
Kort M, Klijn EH. Public–private partnerships in urban regeneration projects: organizational form or managerial capacity? Public Adm Rev. 2011;71(4):618–26.CrossRef
20.
Kickert WJ, Klijn E-H, Koppenjan JF. Managing complex networks: strategies for the public sector. London: Sage; 1997.
21.
Koliba C, Wiltshire S, Scheinert S, Turner D, Zia A, Campbell E. The critical role of information sharing to the value proposition of a food systems network. Public Manag Rev. 2017;19(3):284–304.CrossRef
22.
Vangen S. Developing practice-oriented theory on collaboration: a paradox lens. Public Adm Rev. 2017;77(2):263–72.CrossRef
23.
Jewett T, Kling R. The dynamics of computerization in a social science research team: a case study of infrastructure, strategies, and skills. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 1991;9(2):246–75.CrossRef
24.
Star SL, Ruhleder K. Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems.  North Carolina: In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. 1994. p. 253–64.
25.
Bowker GC, Baker K, Millerand F, Ribes D. Toward information infrastructure studies: ways of knowing in a networked environment. In: International handbook of internet research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 97–117.CrossRef
26.
27.
28.
29.
Aanestad M, Grisot M, Hanseth O, Vassilakopoulou P. Information infrastructures for eHealth. In: Aanestad M, Grisot M, Hanseth O, Vassilakopoulou P, editors. Information Infrastructures within European Health Care. Switzerland: Springer. 2017. p. 11–23.CrossRef
30.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 20514 2005. In: Health informatics — Electronic health record — Definition, scope and context. Geneva: Technical Committee ISO/TC 215, H. I.; 2005.
31.
Winter A, Haux R, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Hellrung N, Jahn F. Health information systems. In: Health information systems. London: Springer. 2010. p. 33–42.CrossRef
32.
Gil-Garcia JR, Chengalur-Smith I, Duchessi P. Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. Eur J Inf Syst. 2007;16(2):121–33.CrossRef
33.
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78.CrossRef
34.
Hennington A, Janz BD. Information systems and healthcare XVI: physician adoption of electronic medical records: applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2007;19(1):5.
35.
Williams MD, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. J Enterp Inf Manag. 2015;28(3):443–88.CrossRef
36.
Report No. 47 (2008–2009) to the Storting. The coordination reform, proper treatment –at the right place and right time. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2009.
37.
Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications; 2013.
38.
39.
Reichert M. What BPM technology can do for healthcare process support. In: Peleg M, Lavrac N, Combi C. (eds). Artif Intell Med. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6747. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; AIME 2011.CrossRef
40.
Emanuele J, Koetter L. Workflow opportunities and challenges in healthcare. 2007 BPM & Workflow Handbook, vol. 1; 2007. p. 157.
41.
Reason P, Bradbury H. Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.
42.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12.CrossRef
43.
Kohlbacher F. The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research, vol. 7; 2006.
44.
QSR International Pty Ltd.: NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2012.
45.
Cruzes DS, Dybå T. Research synthesis in software engineering: a tertiary study. Inf Softw Technol. 2011;53(5):440–55.CrossRef
46.
Pope C, Mays N, Popay J. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence. Birkshire: Open University Press; 2007.
47.
Van Raak A, Mur-Veeman I, Paulus A. Understanding the feasibility of integrated care: a rival viewpoint on the influence of actions and the institutional context. Int J Health Plann Manag. 1999;14(3):235–48.CrossRef
48.
van Raak A. Integrated care in Europe: description and comparison of integrated care in six EU countries. Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2003.
49.
Dourish P, Bellotti V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work. New York: ACM. 1992. p. 107–14.
50.
Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, McGivern G, Dopson S, Bennett C. Public policy networks and ‘wicked problems’: a nascent solution? Public Adm. 2011;89(2):307–24.CrossRef
51.
Roberts N. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. Int Public Manag Rev. 2000;1(1):1–19.
52.
Horn RE, Weber RP. New tools for resolving wicked problems: Mess mapping and resolution mapping processes. Watertown: Strategy Kinetics LLC; 2007.
53.
Association WM. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama. 2013;310(20):2191.
Metadata
Title
Barriers to exchanging healthcare information in inter-municipal healthcare services: a qualitative case study
Authors
Elisabeth Holen-Rabbersvik
Elin Thygesen
Tom Roar Eikebrokk
Rune Werner Fensli
Åshild Slettebø
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0701-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2018 Go to the issue

Software

Timeline representation of clinical data: usability and added value for pharmacovigilance

Research article

Developing a tablet computer-based application (‘App’) to measure self-reported alcohol consumption in Indigenous Australians

Research article

Data to diagnosis in global health: a 3P approach

Research article

The QUEST for quality online health information: validation of a short quantitative tool

Research article

The effect of model selection on cost-effectiveness research: a comparison of kidney function-based microsimulation and disease grade-based microsimulation in chronic kidney disease modeling

Research article

X-search: an open access interface for cross-cohort exploration of the National Sleep Research Resource