Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review

Authors: C Keyworth, J Hart, C J Armitage, M P Tully

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Technological support may be crucial in optimizing healthcare professional practice and improving patient outcomes. A focus on electronic health records has left other technological supports relatively neglected. Additionally, there has been no comparison between different types of technology-based interventions, and the importance of delivery setting on the implementation of technology-based interventions to change professional practice. Consequently, there is a need to synthesise and examine intervention characteristics using a methodology suited to identifying important features of effective interventions, and the barriers and facilitators to implementation. Three aims were addressed: to identify interventions with a technological component that are successful at changing professional practice, to determine if and how such interventions are theory-based, and to examine barriers and facilitators to successful implementation.

Methods

A literature review informed by realist review methods was conducted involving a systematic search of studies reporting either: (1) behavior change interventions that included technology to support professional practice change; or (2) barriers and facilitators to implementation of technological interventions. Extracted data was quantitative and qualitative, and included setting, target professionals, and use of Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs). The primary outcome was a change in professional practice. A thematic analysis was conducted on studies reporting barriers and facilitators of implementation.

Results

Sixty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria; 48 (27 randomized controlled trials) reported behavior change interventions and 21 reported practicalities of implementation. The most successful technological intervention was decision support providing healthcare professionals with knowledge and/or person-specific information to assist with patient management. Successful technologies were more likely to operationalise BCTs, particularly “instruction on how to perform the behavior”. Facilitators of implementation included aligning studies with organisational initiatives, ensuring senior peer endorsement, and integration into clinical workload. Barriers included organisational challenges, and design, content and technical issues of technology-based interventions.

Conclusions

Technological interventions must focus on providing decision support for clinical practice using recognized behavior change techniques. Interventions must consider organizational context, clinical workload, and have clearly defined benefits for improving practice and patient outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Behaviour change: individual approaches (PH49). London: NICE; 2014.
2.
Ashcroft DM, et al. Prevalence, nature, severity and risk factors for prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: prospective study in 20 UK hospitals. Drug Saf. 2015;38(9):833–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
4.
Goetz MB, et al. Central implementation strategies outperform local ones in improving HIV testing in Veterans Healthcare Administration facilities. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(10):1311–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
National Health Service (NHS) Yorkshire and the Humber. Prevention and Lifestyle Behaviour Change: A Competence Framework. Yorkshire and the Humber: NHS; 2010.
6.
General Medical Council (GMC). Tomorrow’s doctors: outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education: London, GMC; 2009.
7.
Ross S, et al. Perceived causes of prescribing errors by junior doctors in hospital inpatients: a study from the PROTECT programme. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(2):97–102.PubMedCrossRef
8.
van Wyk JT, et al. Electronic alerts versus on-demand decision support to improve dyslipidemia treatment: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2008;117(3):371–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Bahrami M, et al. Effectiveness of strategies to disseminate and implement clinical guidelines for the management of impacted and unerupted third molars in primary dental care, a cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2004;197(11):691–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Buising KL, et al. Improving antibiotic prescribing for adults with community acquired pneumonia: does a computerised decision support system achieve more than academic detailing alone? - A time series analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2008;8:35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Goyder C, et al. Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD007979.
12.
Fiander M, et al. Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD004749.
13.
Arditi C, et al. Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals; effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD001175.PubMed
14.
Campanella P, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pub Health. 2016;26(1):60–4.CrossRef
15.
Brown CL, et al. A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016.
16.
Gardner B, et al. Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1618–25.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Michie S, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Eccles M, et al. Changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(2):107-12.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Eccles MP, et al. Explaining clinical behaviors using multiple theoretical models. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):1–13.CrossRef
20.
Ross J, et al. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. 2016;11:146.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
22.
Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.; 2013.CrossRef
23.
Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl 1):6–20.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Tsang JY, et al. Understanding the implementation of interventions to improve the management of chronic kidney disease in primary care: a rapid realist review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Pearson M, et al. Implementing health promotion programmes in schools: a realist systematic review of research and experience in the United Kingdom. Implement Sci. 2015;10:149.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Vassilev I, et al. Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Pearson M, et al. Using realist review to inform intervention development: methodological illustration and conceptual platform for collaborative care in offender mental health. Implement Sci. 2015;10:134.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Craig P, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. 2008;337.
29.
30.
Pawson R, et al. Realist review—a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(Suppl 1):21–34.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Michie S, et al. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28(6):690–701.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bazeley P, Jackson K. In: Bazeley P, Jackson K, editors. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo, London: Sage Publications Limited.; 2013.
33.
Kastner M, et al. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Edelman EA, et al. Evaluation of a novel electronic genetic screening and clinical decision support tool in prenatal clinical settings. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(5):1233–45.PubMedCrossRef
35.
36.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
37.
38.
Gupta A, et al. Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(e2):e347–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Maiburg BH, et al. Controlled trial of effect of computer-based nutrition course on knowledge and practice of general practitioner trainees. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(4 Suppl):1019S–24S.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Avery AJ, et al. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1310–9.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Fein JA, et al. Feasibility and effects of a web-based adolescent psychiatric assessment administered by clinical staff in the pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(12):1112–7.PubMedCrossRef
42.
43.
Ackerman SL, et al. One size does not fit all: evaluating an intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:462.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Chauhan BF, et al. Behavior change interventions and policies influencing primary healthcare professionals’ practice-an overview of reviews. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
Johnson MJ, May CR. Promoting professional behaviour change in healthcare: what interventions work, and why? A theory-led overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9):e008592.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Beidas RS, et al. Training and consultation to promote implementation of an empirically supported treatment: a randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(7):660–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Hrisos S, et al. An intervention modelling experiment to change GPs’ intentions to implement evidence-based practice: using theory-based interventions to promote GP management of upper respiratory tract infection without prescribing antibiotics #2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Presseau J, et al. Reflective and automatic processes in health care professional behaviour: a dual process model tested across multiple behaviours. Ann Behav Med. 2014;48(3):347–58.PubMedCrossRef
54.
55.
Shojania KG, et al. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD001096.
56.
57.
Beeckman D, et al. A multi-faceted tailored strategy to implement an electronic clinical decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention in nursing homes: a two-armed randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):475–86.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Carton M, et al. Assessment of radiological referral practice and effect of computer-based guidelines on radiological requests in two emergency departments. Clin Radiol. 2002;57(2):123–8.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Cosgrove SE, et al. Impact of different methods of feedback to clinicians after postprescription antimicrobial review based on the centers for disease control and prevention’s 12 steps to prevent antimicrobial resistance among hospitalized adults. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(6):641–6.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Curtis JR, et al. Challenges in improving the quality of osteoporosis care for long-term glucocorticoid users: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(6):591–6.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Dimeff LA, et al. Which training method works best? A randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of training clinicians in dialectical behavior therapy skills. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(11):921–30.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Dykes PC, et al. Clinical practice guideline adherence before and after implementation of the HEARTFELT (HEART Failure Effectiveness & Leadership Team) intervention. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;20(5):306–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Eccles M, et al. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):941.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Fifield J, et al. Improving pediatric asthma control among minority children participating in medicaid: providing practice redesign support to deliver a chronic care model. J Asthma. 2010;47(7):718–27.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Filippi A, et al. Effects of an automated electronic reminder in changing the antiplatelet drug-prescribing behavior among Italian general practitioners in diabetic patients: an intervention trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1497–500.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Gerber JS, et al. Effect of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing by primary care pediatricians: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309(22):2345–52.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Gonzales R, et al. A cluster randomized trial of decision support strategies for reducing antibiotic use in acute bronchitis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(4):267–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Guldberg TL, et al. Improved quality of type 2 diabetes care following electronic feedback of treatment status to general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2011;28(3):325–32.PubMed
69.
Hibbs SP, et al. The impact of electronic decision support and electronic remote blood issue on transfusion practice. Transfus Med. 2014;24(5):274–9.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Hobbs FD, et al. A prospective controlled trial of computerized decision support for lipid management in primary care. Fam Pract. 1996;13(2):133–7.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Hoch I, et al. Countrywide computer alerts to community physicians improve potassium testing in patients receiving diuretics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(6):541–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
73.
Litvin CB, et al. Use of an electronic health record clinical decision support tool to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections: the ABX-TRIP study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(6):810–6.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Lobach DF, Hammond WE. Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. Am J Med. 1997;102(1):89–98.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Malone DC, Saverno KR. Evaluation of a wireless handheld medication management device in the prevention of drug-drug interactions in a Medicaid population. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012;18(1):33–45.PubMed
76.
77.
Nilasena DS, Lincoln MJ. A computer-generated reminder system improves physician compliance with diabetes preventive care guidelines. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:640–5.
78.
Patkar V, et al. Evidence-based guidelines and decision support services: a discussion and evaluation in triple assessment of suspected breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(11):1490–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Piening S, et al. The additional value of an e-mail to inform healthcare professionals of a drug safety issue: a randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands. Drug Saf. 2013;36(9):723–31.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Reeve JF, Tenni PC, Peterson GM. An electronic prompt in dispensing software to promote clinical interventions by community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(3):377–85.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Ribeiro-Vaz I, et al. Promoting spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in hospitals using a hyperlink to the online reporting form: an ecological study in Portugal. Drug Saf. 2012;35(5):387–94.PubMedCrossRef
82.
83.
Ruland CM. Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(2):192–201.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
Schwarz EB, et al. Clinical decision support to promote safe prescribing to women of reproductive age: a cluster-randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(7):831–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
85.
Sharifi M, et al. Enhancing the electronic health record to increase counseling and quit-line referral for parents who smoke. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14(5):478–84.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Strayer SM, et al. Improving smoking cessation counseling using a point-of-care health intervention tool (IT): from the Virginia Practice Support and Research Network (VaPSRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(2):116–25.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Strom BL, et al. Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1578–83.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Tang PC, et al. Measuring the effects of reminders for outpatient influenza immunizations at the point of clinical opportunity. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(2):115–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
89.
Vagholkar S, et al. Influence of cardiovascular absolute risk assessment on prescribing of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2014;167(1):28–35.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Walker J, et al. Computer reminders for chlamydia screening in general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(7):445–50.PubMed
91.
Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis, vol. 49. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications; 2001.
92.
Barnett J, et al. myPace: an integrative health platform for supporting weight loss and maintenance behaviors. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015;19(1):109–16.PubMedCrossRef
93.
94.
Burns P, et al. The introduction of electronic medication charts and prescribing in aged care facilities: an evaluation. Australas J Ageing. 2007;26(3):131–4.CrossRef
95.
Doerr M, et al. Formative evaluation of clinician experience with integrating family history-based clinical decision support into clinical practice. J Pers Med. 2014;4(2):115–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
Dowding D, et al. Nurses’ use of computerised clinical decision support systems: a case site analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(8):1159–67.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Dryden EM, et al. Provider perspectives on electronic decision supports for obesity prevention. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51(5):490–7.CrossRef
98.
Guldberg TL, et al. Suboptimal quality of type 2 diabetes care discovered through electronic feedback led to increased nurse-GP cooperation. A qualitative study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010;4(1):33–9.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Hains IM, et al. Standardizing care in medical oncology: are web-based systems the answer? Cancer. 2009;115(23):5579–88.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Litvin CB, et al. Adoption of a clinical decision support system to promote judicious use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(8):521–6.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Maguire R, et al. Nurse’s perceptions and experiences of using of a mobile-phone-based Advanced Symptom Management System (ASyMS©) to monitor and manage chemotherapy-related toxicity. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(4):380–6.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Mandt I, Horn AM, Granas AG. [Communication about prescription interventions between pharmacists and general practitioners]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009;129(18):1846–9.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Power JMH, et al. Integration of smartphones into clinical pharmacy practice: an evaluation of the impact on pharmacists′ efficiency. Health Policy and Technology. 2014;3(4):296–305.CrossRef
104.
Randell R, Dowding D. Organisational influences on nurses’ use of clinical decision support systems. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):412–21.PubMedCrossRef
105.
Rousseau N, et al. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326(7384):314.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
106.
107.
Vishwanath A, et al. Patterns and changes in prescriber attitudes toward PDA prescription-assistive technology. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(5):330–9.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Weir C, et al. The role of information technology in translating educational interventions into practice: an analysis using the PRECEDE/PROCEED model. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(6):827–34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
109.
Zhu X, Cimino JJ. Clinicians’ evaluation of computer-assisted medication summarization of electronic medical records. Comput Biol Med. 2015;59:221–31.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review
Authors
C Keyworth
J Hart
C J Armitage
M P Tully
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0661-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2018 Go to the issue

Software

CogStack - experiences of deploying integrated information retrieval and extraction services in a large National Health Service Foundation Trust hospital

Research article

Algorithm-based decision support for symptom self-management among adults with Cancer: results of usability testing

Research article

Design and implementation of an m-health data model for improving health information access for reproductive and child health services in low resource settings using a participatory action research approach

Technical advance

Designing mHealth for maternity services in primary health facilities in a low-income setting – lessons from a partially successful implementation

Research article

Continuance compliance of privacy policy of electronic medical records: the roles of both motivation and habit

Research article

Identification of research hypotheses and new knowledge from scientific literature