Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Experimental application of Business Process Management technology to manage clinical pathways: a pediatric kidney transplantation follow up case

Authors: Martina Andellini, Sandra Fernandez Riesgo, Federica Morolli, Matteo Ritrovato, Piero Cosoli, Silverio Petruzzellis, Nicola Rosso

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To test the application of Business Process Management technology to manage clinical pathways, using a pediatric kidney transplantation as case study, and to identify the benefits obtained from using this technology.

Methods

Using a Business Process Management platform, we implemented a specific application to manage the clinical pathway of pediatric patients, and monitored the activities of the coordinator in charge of the case management during a 6-month period (from June 2015 to November 2015) using two methodologies: the traditional procedure and the one under study.

Results

The application helped physicians and nurses to optimize the amount of time and resources devoted to management purposes. In particular, time reduction was close to 60%. In addition, the reduction of data duplication, the integrated event management and the efficient data collection improved the quality of the service.

Conclusions

The use of Business Process Management technology, usually related to well-defined processes with high management costs, is an established procedure in multiple environments; its use in healthcare, however, is innovative. The use of already accepted clinical pathways is known to improve outcomes. The combination of these two techniques, well established in their respective areas of application, could represent a revolution in clinical pathway management. The study has demonstrated that the use of this technology in a clinical environment, using a proper architecture and identifying a well-defined process, leads to real benefits in terms of resources optimization and quality improvement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference England I, Stewart D, Walker S. Information technology adoption in health care: when organisations and technology collide. Aust Health Rev. 2000;23(3):176–85.CrossRefPubMed England I, Stewart D, Walker S. Information technology adoption in health care: when organisations and technology collide. Aust Health Rev. 2000;23(3):176–85.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference anella M, Marchisio S, Di Stanislao F. Reducing Clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work? Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):509-521. anella M, Marchisio S, Di Stanislao F. Reducing Clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work? Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):509-521.
4.
go back to reference Panella M. Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways. Do pathway work? Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):509–21.CrossRefPubMed Panella M. Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways. Do pathway work? Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):509–21.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference González Sánchez MJ, Framiñán Torres JM, Parra Calderón CL, et al. Application of business process management to drive the deployment of a speech recognition system in a healthcare organization. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:511–6.PubMed González Sánchez MJ, Framiñán Torres JM, Parra Calderón CL, et al. Application of business process management to drive the deployment of a speech recognition system in a healthcare organization. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:511–6.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Barbagallo S, Corradi L, de Ville de Goyet J, et al. Optimization and planning of operating theatre activities: an original definition of pathways and process modeling. BMC Med Inform DecisMak. 2015;17(15):38.CrossRef Barbagallo S, Corradi L, de Ville de Goyet J, et al. Optimization and planning of operating theatre activities: an original definition of pathways and process modeling. BMC Med Inform DecisMak. 2015;17(15):38.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tozzi AE, Mazzotti E, Di Ciommo VM, et al. Quality of life in a cohort of patients diagnosed with renal failure in childhood and who received renal transplant. Pediatr Transplant. 2012;16(8):840–5.CrossRefPubMed Tozzi AE, Mazzotti E, Di Ciommo VM, et al. Quality of life in a cohort of patients diagnosed with renal failure in childhood and who received renal transplant. Pediatr Transplant. 2012;16(8):840–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cohen D, Galbraith C. General health management and long-term care of the renal transplant recipient. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(6Suppl6):S10–24.CrossRefPubMed Cohen D, Galbraith C. General health management and long-term care of the renal transplant recipient. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(6Suppl6):S10–24.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Adams PL. Long-term patient survival: strategies to improve overall health. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(4Suppl2):S65–85.CrossRefPubMed Adams PL. Long-term patient survival: strategies to improve overall health. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(4Suppl2):S65–85.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Howard AD. Long-term posttransplantation care: the expanding role of community nephrologists. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(4Suppl2):S111–24.CrossRefPubMed Howard AD. Long-term posttransplantation care: the expanding role of community nephrologists. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(4Suppl2):S111–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Josephson MA. Monitoring and managing graft health in the kidney transplant recipient. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(7):1774–80.CrossRefPubMed Josephson MA. Monitoring and managing graft health in the kidney transplant recipient. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(7):1774–80.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hariharan S. Recommendations for outpatient monitoring of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(4Suppl2):S22–36.CrossRefPubMed Hariharan S. Recommendations for outpatient monitoring of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(4Suppl2):S22–36.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kasiske BL, Vazquez MA, Harmon WE, et al. Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(Suppl 15):S1–86.PubMed Kasiske BL, Vazquez MA, Harmon WE, et al. Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(Suppl 15):S1–86.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Howard AD. Long-term management of the renal transplant recipient: optimizing the relationship between the transplant center and the community nephrologist. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(6 Suppl 6):S51–7.CrossRefPubMed Howard AD. Long-term management of the renal transplant recipient: optimizing the relationship between the transplant center and the community nephrologist. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(6 Suppl 6):S51–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Experimental application of Business Process Management technology to manage clinical pathways: a pediatric kidney transplantation follow up case
Authors
Martina Andellini
Sandra Fernandez Riesgo
Federica Morolli
Matteo Ritrovato
Piero Cosoli
Silverio Petruzzellis
Nicola Rosso
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0546-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017 Go to the issue