Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians

Authors: Maria Dolors Ruiz Morilla, Mireia Sans, Albert Casasa, Nuria Giménez

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Technology has significantly changed the way health organizations operate. However, the role it plays in healthcare systems remains unclear. This aim of this study was to evaluate the opinion of physicians regarding e-health and determine what factors influence their opinion and describe the advantages, inconveniences and threats they may perceive by its use.

Methods

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. A questionnaire which had been previously designed and validated by the authors was used to interview physicians from the Barcelona Medical Association. 930 physicians were contacted by phone to participate in the study.

Results

Seven hundred sixty physicians responded to the questionnaire (response rate: 82%). The usefulness of telemedicine scored 7.4 (SD 1.8) on a scale from 1–10 (from the lowest to the highest) and the importance of the Internet in the workplace was 8.2 points (SD 1.8). Therapeutic compliance (7.0 -SD 1.8-) and patient health (7.0 -SD 1.7-) showed the best scores, and there were differences between professionals who had and had not previously participated in a telemedicine project (p < 0.05). The multivariate regression model explained the 41% of the variance for 7 factors: participation in telemedicine project (p < 0.001), quality of clinical practice (p < 0.001), patient health (p < 0.001), professional workload (p = 0.005), ease-of-use of electronic device (p = 0.007), presence of incentives for telemedicine (p = 0.011) and patient preference for in-person visits (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

Physicians believe in the usefulness of e-health. Professionals with previous experience with it are more open to its implementation and consider that the benefits of technology outweigh its possible difficulties and shortcomings. Physicians demanded projects with appropriate funding and technology, as well as specific training to improve their technological abilities. The relationship of users with technology differs according to their personal or professional life. Although a 2.0 philosophy has been incorporated into many aspects of our lives, healthcare systems still have a long way to go in order to adapt to this new understanding of the relationship between patients and their health.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J TelemedTelecare. 2002;8 Suppl 1:1–30. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J TelemedTelecare. 2002;8 Suppl 1:1–30.
4.
go back to reference National Audit Office. The National Programme for IT in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office; 2006. National Audit Office. The National Programme for IT in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office; 2006.
7.
go back to reference Honka A, Kaipainen K, Hietala H, Saranummi N. Rethinkinghealth: ICT-enabled services to empower people to manage their health. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;4:119–39.CrossRefPubMed Honka A, Kaipainen K, Hietala H, Saranummi N. Rethinkinghealth: ICT-enabled services to empower people to manage their health. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;4:119–39.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Grando M, Rozemblum R, Bates D. Information technology for patient empowerment in healthcare. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2015.CrossRef Grando M, Rozemblum R, Bates D. Information technology for patient empowerment in healthcare. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2015.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McGinn, et al. Comparison of usergroups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McGinn, et al. Comparison of usergroups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
16.
go back to reference Morrissey J. Two big reasons physicians resist Mobile health. Hosp Health Netw. 2014;88(6):26–7. Morrissey J. Two big reasons physicians resist Mobile health. Hosp Health Netw. 2014;88(6):26–7.
17.
go back to reference Macdonald EM, Perrin BM, Kinsley MIC. Enablers and barriers to using two-way information technology in the management of adults with diabetes: A descriptive systematic review. J TelemedTelecare. 2017 Jan 1:1357633X17699990. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17699990 Macdonald EM, Perrin BM, Kinsley MIC. Enablers and barriers to using two-way information technology in the management of adults with diabetes: A descriptive systematic review. J TelemedTelecare. 2017 Jan 1:1357633X17699990. doi: 10.​1177/​1357633X17699990​
22.
24.
go back to reference Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD002098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002098.pub2. Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD002098. doi: 10.​1002/​14651858.​CD002098.​pub2.
25.
go back to reference Brebner EM, Brebner JA. Implementation and evaluation of telemedicine for remote health-care-the European Northern Periphery Programme Project. J TelemedTelecare. 2001;7 Suppl 1:68–9. Brebner EM, Brebner JA. Implementation and evaluation of telemedicine for remote health-care-the European Northern Periphery Programme Project. J TelemedTelecare. 2001;7 Suppl 1:68–9.
27.
go back to reference Lyngstad M, Hofoss D, Grimsmo A, Hellesø R. Predictors for Assessing Electronic Messaging Between Nurses and General Practitioners as a Useful Tool for Communication in Home Health Care Services: A Cross-Sectional Study. Eysenbach G, ed. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e47. doi:10.2196/jmir.4056. Lyngstad M, Hofoss D, Grimsmo A, Hellesø R. Predictors for Assessing Electronic Messaging Between Nurses and General Practitioners as a Useful Tool for Communication in Home Health Care Services: A Cross-Sectional Study. Eysenbach G, ed. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e47. doi:10.​2196/​jmir.​4056.
30.
go back to reference Shaw RJ, Kaufman MA, Bosworth HB, et al. Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:106. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shaw RJ, Kaufman MA, Bosworth HB, et al. Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:106. doi:10.​1186/​1748-5908-8-106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
32.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press; 1983. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press; 1983.
34.
37.
go back to reference Tennant B, Stellefson M, Dodd V, et al. eHealth Literacy and Web 2.0 Health Information Seeking Behaviors Among Baby Boomers and Older Adults. Eysenbach G, ed. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17:e70. doi:10.2196/jmir.3992. Tennant B, Stellefson M, Dodd V, et al. eHealth Literacy and Web 2.0 Health Information Seeking Behaviors Among Baby Boomers and Older Adults. Eysenbach G, ed. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17:e70. doi:10.​2196/​jmir.​3992.
Metadata
Title
Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians
Authors
Maria Dolors Ruiz Morilla
Mireia Sans
Albert Casasa
Nuria Giménez
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0489-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017 Go to the issue