Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)

Authors: Hsiao-Yun Chang, Chia-Lun Lo, Yun-Ying Hung

Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to develop and validate scales to assess attitudes towards patient’ s use of TCM (APUTCM) and to measure a communicative competence in TCM (CCTCM) among nurses.

Methods

The instrument development process was conducted from Sep 2013 to Jul 2014, using the following steps: 1) item development; 2) internal review and refinement; 3) face and content validation; 4) instrument administration to a development sample; and 5) evaluation of validity and reliability. A convenience sample was used to recruit registered and advanced practice nurses who worked in different regions throughout Taiwan. A total of 755 respondents completed the online questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using the software of SPSS Version 21.0 and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) version 24.0.

Results

The scale-level indexes (S-CVI) of content validity for both scales were over 80%. The reliabilities for the 13-item APUTCM scale and for the five-item CCTCM scale were 0.88 and 0.84, respectively. The model suitability for both scales was assessed, and the findings revealed suitable parameters for all indicators: GFI = 0.954, AGFI = 0.932, CFI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.62, and chi-square/df = 3.891 for APUTCM; and GFI = 0.992, AGFI = 0.969, CFI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.63, and chi-square/df = 4.04 for CCTCM. The convergent and divergent validity of scores on both scales provided evidence in the expected direction.

Conclusion

This scale development study provides preliminary evidence that suggests that the 13-item APUTCM and the five-item CCTCM are reliable and valid scales for assessing attitudes toward patient’s TCM use and communicative competence in TCM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Qi Z. WHO traditional medicine strategy. 2014–2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Qi Z. WHO traditional medicine strategy. 2014–2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
2.
go back to reference Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence and determinants of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine provider use among adults from 32 countries. Chin J Integr Med. 2018;24(8):584–90.CrossRef Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence and determinants of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine provider use among adults from 32 countries. Chin J Integr Med. 2018;24(8):584–90.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Koc Z, Cinarli T. The determination of complementary and alternative medicine use in patients presenting at the emergency room. Complement Ther Clin. 2018;31:164–9.CrossRef Koc Z, Cinarli T. The determination of complementary and alternative medicine use in patients presenting at the emergency room. Complement Ther Clin. 2018;31:164–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yang L, Sibbritt D, Adams J. A critical review of complementary and alternative medicine use among people with arthritis: a focus upon prevalence, cost, user profiles, motivation, decision-making, perceived benefits and communication. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(3):337–51.CrossRef Yang L, Sibbritt D, Adams J. A critical review of complementary and alternative medicine use among people with arthritis: a focus upon prevalence, cost, user profiles, motivation, decision-making, perceived benefits and communication. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(3):337–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jong M, Lundqvist V, Jong MC. A cross-sectional study on Swedish licensed nurses’ use, practice, perception and knowledge about complementary and alternative medicine. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;29(4):642–50.CrossRef Jong M, Lundqvist V, Jong MC. A cross-sectional study on Swedish licensed nurses’ use, practice, perception and knowledge about complementary and alternative medicine. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;29(4):642–50.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chang HY, Chang HL. A review of nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and ability to communicate the risks and benefits of complementary and alternative medicine. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(11–12):1466–78.CrossRef Chang HY, Chang HL. A review of nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and ability to communicate the risks and benefits of complementary and alternative medicine. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(11–12):1466–78.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior : theory, research, and practice. 5th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2015. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior : theory, research, and practice. 5th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2015.
8.
go back to reference Schneider CD, Meek PM, Bell IR. Development and validation of IMAQ: integrative medicine attitude questionnaire. BMC Med Educ. 2003;3:5.CrossRef Schneider CD, Meek PM, Bell IR. Development and validation of IMAQ: integrative medicine attitude questionnaire. BMC Med Educ. 2003;3:5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schmidt K, Rees C, Greenfield S, Wearn AM, Dennis I, Patil NG, Amri H, Boon H. Multischool, international survey of medical students’ attitudes toward “holism”. Acad Med. 2005;80(10):955–63.CrossRef Schmidt K, Rees C, Greenfield S, Wearn AM, Dennis I, Patil NG, Amri H, Boon H. Multischool, international survey of medical students’ attitudes toward “holism”. Acad Med. 2005;80(10):955–63.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Abbott RB, Hui KK, Hays RD, Mandel J, Goldstein M, Winegarden B, Glaser D, Brunton L. Medical student attitudes toward complementary, alternative and integrative medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:1–14.CrossRef Abbott RB, Hui KK, Hays RD, Mandel J, Goldstein M, Winegarden B, Glaser D, Brunton L. Medical student attitudes toward complementary, alternative and integrative medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:1–14.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2017. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2017.
13.
go back to reference Henderson A, Eaton E, Burmeister L. Development and preliminary validation of a tool to measure nurses’ support for facilitating the learning of others. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(8):1013–6.CrossRef Henderson A, Eaton E, Burmeister L. Development and preliminary validation of a tool to measure nurses’ support for facilitating the learning of others. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(8):1013–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Howard JA, Sheth JN. The theory of buyer behavior. New York: Wiley; 1969. Howard JA, Sheth JN. The theory of buyer behavior. New York: Wiley; 1969.
15.
go back to reference Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata A. Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.CrossRef Abell N, Springer DW, Kamata A. Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Becker G. Creating comparability among reliability coefficients: the case of Cronbach alpha and Cohen kappa. Psychol Rep. 2000;87(3 Pt 2):1171–82.CrossRef Becker G. Creating comparability among reliability coefficients: the case of Cronbach alpha and Cohen kappa. Psychol Rep. 2000;87(3 Pt 2):1171–82.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hair JF. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2010. Hair JF. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2010.
18.
go back to reference Vandenberg RJ. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends - where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organ Res Methods. 2006;9(2):194–201.CrossRef Vandenberg RJ. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends - where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organ Res Methods. 2006;9(2):194–201.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Balouchi A, Mahmoudirad G, Hastings-Tolsma M, Shorofi SA, Shahdadi H, Abdollahimohammad A. Knowledge, attitude and use of complementary and alternative medicine among nurses: a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin. 2018;31:146–57.CrossRef Balouchi A, Mahmoudirad G, Hastings-Tolsma M, Shorofi SA, Shahdadi H, Abdollahimohammad A. Knowledge, attitude and use of complementary and alternative medicine among nurses: a systematic review. Complement Ther Clin. 2018;31:146–57.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013. Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013.
21.
go back to reference O'Brien D. An introduction to the theory of knowledge. 2nd ed. Cambridge; Malden: Polity Press; 2017. O'Brien D. An introduction to the theory of knowledge. 2nd ed. Cambridge; Malden: Polity Press; 2017.
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM)
Authors
Hsiao-Yun Chang
Chia-Lun Lo
Yun-Ying Hung
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2662-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2733-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2019 Go to the issue