Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Care | Research article

International palliative care research priorities: A systematic review

Authors: Felicity Hasson, Emma Nicholson, Deborah Muldrew, Olufikayo Bamidele, Sheila Payne, Sonja McIlfatrick

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There has been increasing evidence and debate on palliative care research priorities and the international research agenda. To date, however, there is a lack of synthesis of this evidence, examining commonalities, differences, and gaps. To identify and synthesize literature on international palliative care research priorities originating from Western countries mapped to a quality assessment framework.

Methods

A systematic review of several academic and grey databases were searched from January 2008–June 2019 for studies eliciting research priorities in palliative care in English. Two researchers independently reviewed, critically appraised, and conducted data extraction and synthesis.

Results

The search yielded 10,235 articles (academic databases, n = 4108; grey literature, n = 6127), of which ten were included for appraisal and review. Priority areas were identified: service models; continuity of care; training and education; inequality; communication; living well and independently; and recognising family/carer needs and the importance of families. Methodological approaches and process of reporting varied. There was little representation of patient and caregiver driven agendas. The priorities were mapped to the Donabedian framework for assessing quality reflecting structure, process and outcomes and key priority areas.

Conclusions

Limited evidence exists pertaining to research priorities across palliative care. Whilst a broad range of topics were elicited, approaches and samples varied questioning the credibility of findings. The voice of the care provider dominated, calling for more inclusive means to capture the patient and family voice. The findings of this study may serve as a template to understand the commonalities of research, identify gaps, and extend the palliative care research agenda.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
15.
go back to reference PeolcPSP. Palliative and end of life care Priority Setting Partnership - Final Report [Internet]. 2015. Available from: Palliative and end of life care Priority Setting Partnership. PeolcPSP. Palliative and end of life care Priority Setting Partnership - Final Report [Internet]. 2015. Available from: Palliative and end of life care Priority Setting Partnership.
16.
go back to reference Lechelt LA, Rieger JM, Cowan K, Debenham BJ, Krewski B, Nayar S, et al. Top 10 research priorities in head and neck cancer: results of an Alberta priority setting partnership of patients, caregivers, family members, and clinicians. Head Neck. 2018;40(3):544–54.PubMedCrossRef Lechelt LA, Rieger JM, Cowan K, Debenham BJ, Krewski B, Nayar S, et al. Top 10 research priorities in head and neck cancer: results of an Alberta priority setting partnership of patients, caregivers, family members, and clinicians. Head Neck. 2018;40(3):544–54.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Selman L, Young T, Vermandere M, Stirling I, Leget C. Research Subgroup of European Association for Palliative Care Spiritual Care Taskforce. Research Priorities in Spiritual Care: An International Survey of Palliative Care Researchers and Clinicians. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(4):518–31 [cited 2018 Nov 29] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24680625.PubMedCrossRef Selman L, Young T, Vermandere M, Stirling I, Leget C. Research Subgroup of European Association for Palliative Care Spiritual Care Taskforce. Research Priorities in Spiritual Care: An International Survey of Palliative Care Researchers and Clinicians. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(4):518–31 [cited 2018 Nov 29] Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24680625.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Pol Syst. 2010;8:36.CrossRef Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Pol Syst. 2010;8:36.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tomlinson M, Yasamy MT, Emerson E, Officer A, Richler D, Saxena S. Setting global research priorities for developmental disabilities, including intellectual disabilities and autism. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014;58(12):1121–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tomlinson M, Yasamy MT, Emerson E, Officer A, Richler D, Saxena S. Setting global research priorities for developmental disabilities, including intellectual disabilities and autism. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014;58(12):1121–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs institute Reviewer’s manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute 2014. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs institute Reviewer’s manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute 2014.
41.
go back to reference The Joanna Briggs Institute. Checklist for systematic reviews and Research syntheses. Joanna Briggs Inst 2016; The Joanna Briggs Institute. Checklist for systematic reviews and Research syntheses. Joanna Briggs Inst 2016;
42.
go back to reference Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies. Critical appraisal tools. 2017. Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies. Critical appraisal tools. 2017.
44.
go back to reference Shipman C, Gysels M, White P, Worth A, Murray SA, Barclay S, et al. Improving generalist end of life care: National consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups. BMJ. 2008;(7674):337, 848–51 [cited 2019 may 30] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18829640. Shipman C, Gysels M, White P, Worth A, Murray SA, Barclay S, et al. Improving generalist end of life care: National consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups. BMJ. 2008;(7674):337, 848–51 [cited 2019 may 30] Available from: http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​18829640.
63.
go back to reference Terry RF, Charles E, Purdy B, Sanford A. An analysis of research priority-setting at the World Health Organization - How mapping to a standard template allows for comparison between research priority-setting approaches. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2018;16:116.CrossRef Terry RF, Charles E, Purdy B, Sanford A. An analysis of research priority-setting at the World Health Organization - How mapping to a standard template allows for comparison between research priority-setting approaches. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2018;16:116.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
International palliative care research priorities: A systematic review
Authors
Felicity Hasson
Emma Nicholson
Deborah Muldrew
Olufikayo Bamidele
Sheila Payne
Sonja McIlfatrick
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0520-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Palliative Care 1/2020 Go to the issue