Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Measuring geographical accessibility to palliative and end of life (PEoLC) related facilities: a comparative study in an area with well-developed specialist palliative care (SPC) provision

Authors: Clare Pearson, Julia Verne, Claudia Wells, Giovanna M. Polato, Irene J Higginson, Wei Gao

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Geographical accessibility is important in accessing healthcare services. Measuring it has evolved alongside technological and data analysis advances. High correlations between different methods have been detected, but no comparisons exist in the context of palliative and end of life care (PEoLC) studies. To assess how geographical accessibility can affect PEoLC, selection of an appropriate method to capture it is crucial.
We therefore aimed to compare methods of measuring geographical accessibility of decedents to PEoLC-related facilities in South London, an area with well-developed SPC provision.

Methods

Individual-level death registration data in 2012 (n = 18,165), from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) were linked to area-level PEoLC-related facilities from various sources. Simple and more complex measures of geographical accessibility were calculated using the residential postcodes of the decedents and postcodes of the nearest hospital, care home and hospice. Distance measures (straight-line, travel network) and travel times along the road network were compared using geographic information system (GIS) mapping and correlation analysis (Spearman rho).

Results

Borough-level maps demonstrate similarities in geographical accessibility measures. Strong positive correlation exist between straight-line and travel distances to the nearest hospital (rho = 0.97), care home (rho = 0.94) and hospice (rho = 0.99). Travel times were also highly correlated with distance measures to the nearest hospital (rho range = 0.84–0.88), care home (rho = 0.88–0.95) and hospice (rho = 0.93–0.95). All correlations were significant at p < 0.001 level.

Conclusions

Distance-based and travel-time measures of geographical accessibility to PEoLC-related facilities in South London are similar, suggesting the choice of measure can be based on the ease of calculation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19:127–40.CrossRefPubMed Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19:127–40.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bissonnette L, Wilson K, Bell S, et al. Neighbourhoods and potential access to health care: The role of spatial and aspatial factors. Health Place. 2012;18:841–53.CrossRefPubMed Bissonnette L, Wilson K, Bell S, et al. Neighbourhoods and potential access to health care: The role of spatial and aspatial factors. Health Place. 2012;18:841–53.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Langford M, Higgs G. Measuring potential access to primary healthcare services: the influence of alternative spatial representations of population. Prof Geogr. 2006;58:294–306.CrossRef Langford M, Higgs G. Measuring potential access to primary healthcare services: the influence of alternative spatial representations of population. Prof Geogr. 2006;58:294–306.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dejardin O, Jones AP, Rachet B, et al. The influence of geographical access to health care and material deprivation on colorectal cancer survival: Evidence from France and England. Health Place. 2014;30:36–44.CrossRefPubMed Dejardin O, Jones AP, Rachet B, et al. The influence of geographical access to health care and material deprivation on colorectal cancer survival: Evidence from France and England. Health Place. 2014;30:36–44.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Martin D, Roderick P, Diamond I, et al. Geographical aspects of the uptake of renal replacement therapy in England. Int J Popul Geogr. 1998;4:227–42.CrossRef Martin D, Roderick P, Diamond I, et al. Geographical aspects of the uptake of renal replacement therapy in England. Int J Popul Geogr. 1998;4:227–42.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fone D, Christie S. Comparison of perceived and modelled geographical access to accident and emergency departments: a cross-sectional analysis from the Caerphilly Health and Social Needs Study. Int J Health Geogr. 2006;5:16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fone D, Christie S. Comparison of perceived and modelled geographical access to accident and emergency departments: a cross-sectional analysis from the Caerphilly Health and Social Needs Study. Int J Health Geogr. 2006;5:16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Jordan H, Roderick P, Martin D, et al. Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England. Int J Health Geogr. 2004;3:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jordan H, Roderick P, Martin D, et al. Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England. Int J Health Geogr. 2004;3:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Martin D, Wrigley H, Barnett S, et al. Increasing the sophistication of access measurement in a rural healthcare study. Health Place. 2002;8:3–13.CrossRefPubMed Martin D, Wrigley H, Barnett S, et al. Increasing the sophistication of access measurement in a rural healthcare study. Health Place. 2002;8:3–13.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jones SG, Ashby AJ, Momin SR, et al. Spatial implications associated with using Euclidean distance measurements and geographic centroid imputation in health care research. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:316–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones SG, Ashby AJ, Momin SR, et al. Spatial implications associated with using Euclidean distance measurements and geographic centroid imputation in health care research. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:316–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Fortney J, Rost K, Warren J. Comparing alternative methods of measuring geographic access to health services. Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2000;1:173–84.CrossRef Fortney J, Rost K, Warren J. Comparing alternative methods of measuring geographic access to health services. Health Serv Outcome Res Methodol. 2000;1:173–84.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Phibbs C, Luft H. Correlation of travel time on roads versus straight line distance. Med Care Res Rev. 1995;52:532–42.CrossRefPubMed Phibbs C, Luft H. Correlation of travel time on roads versus straight line distance. Med Care Res Rev. 1995;52:532–42.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cinnamon J, Schuurman N, Crooks VA. A method to determine spatial access to specialized palliative care services using GIS. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cinnamon J, Schuurman N, Crooks VA. A method to determine spatial access to specialized palliative care services using GIS. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Cinnamon J, Schuurman N, Crooks VA. Assessing the suitability of host communities for secondary palliative care hubs: a location analysis model. Health Place. 2009;15:822–30.CrossRef Cinnamon J, Schuurman N, Crooks VA. Assessing the suitability of host communities for secondary palliative care hubs: a location analysis model. Health Place. 2009;15:822–30.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schuurman N, Amram O, Crooks VA, et al. A comparative analysis of potential spatio-temporal access to palliative care services in two Canadian provinces. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schuurman N, Amram O, Crooks VA, et al. A comparative analysis of potential spatio-temporal access to palliative care services in two Canadian provinces. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Currow DC, Allingham S, Bird S, et al. Referral patterns and proximity to palliative care inpatient services by level of socio-economic disadvantage. A national study using spatial analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Currow DC, Allingham S, Bird S, et al. Referral patterns and proximity to palliative care inpatient services by level of socio-economic disadvantage. A national study using spatial analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Connor SR, Elwert F, Spence C, et al. Geographic variation in hospice use in the United States in 2002. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;34:277–85.CrossRef Connor SR, Elwert F, Spence C, et al. Geographic variation in hospice use in the United States in 2002. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;34:277–85.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Madigan EA, Wiencek CA, Vander Schrier AL. Patterns of community-based end-of-life care in rural areas of the United States. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2009;10:71–81.CrossRefPubMed Madigan EA, Wiencek CA, Vander Schrier AL. Patterns of community-based end-of-life care in rural areas of the United States. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2009;10:71–81.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lindley LC, Edwards SL. Geographic access to hospice care for children with cancer in Tennessee, 2009 to 2011. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015;32(8):849-54. doi:10.1177/1049909114543641. Lindley LC, Edwards SL. Geographic access to hospice care for children with cancer in Tennessee, 2009 to 2011. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015;32(8):849-54. doi:10.​1177/​1049909114543641​.
22.
go back to reference Gatrell AC, Wood DJ. Variation in geographic access to specialist inpatient hospices in England and Wales. Health Place. 2012;18:832–40.CrossRefPubMed Gatrell AC, Wood DJ. Variation in geographic access to specialist inpatient hospices in England and Wales. Health Place. 2012;18:832–40.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Apparicio P, Abdelmajid M, Riva M, et al. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. Int J Health Geogr. 2008;7:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Apparicio P, Abdelmajid M, Riva M, et al. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. Int J Health Geogr. 2008;7:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Measuring geographical accessibility to palliative and end of life (PEoLC) related facilities: a comparative study in an area with well-developed specialist palliative care (SPC) provision
Authors
Clare Pearson
Julia Verne
Claudia Wells
Giovanna M. Polato
Irene J Higginson
Wei Gao
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0185-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Palliative Care 1/2017 Go to the issue