Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

A co-design process developing heuristics for practitioners providing end of life care for people with dementia

Authors: Nathan Davies, Rammya Mathew, Jane Wilcock, Jill Manthorpe, Elizabeth L. Sampson, Kethakie Lamahewa, Steve Iliffe

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The end of life for someone with dementia can present many challenges for practitioners; such as, providing care if there are swallowing difficulties. This study aimed to develop a toolkit of heuristics (rules-of-thumb) to aid practitioners making end-of-life care decisions for people with dementia.

Methods

An iterative co-design approach was adopted using a literature review and qualitative methods, including; 1) qualitative interviews and focus groups with family carers and 2) focus groups with health and care professionals. Family carers were recruited from a national charity, purposively sampling those with experience of end-of-life care for a person with dementia. Health and care professionals were purposively sampled to include a broad range of expertise including; general practitioners, palliative care specialists, and geriatricians. A co-design group was established consisting of health and social care experts and family carers, to synthesise the findings from the qualitative work and produce a toolkit of heuristics to be tested in practice.

Results

Four broad areas were identified as requiring complex decisions at the end of life; 1) eating/swallowing difficulties, 2) agitation/restlessness, 3) ending life-sustaining treatment, and 4) providing “routine care” at the end of life. Each topic became a heuristic consisting of rules arranged into flowcharts. Eating/swallowing difficulties have three rules; ensuring eating/swallowing difficulties do not come as a surprise, considering if the situation is an emergency, and considering ‘comfort feeding’ only versus time-trialled artificial feeding. Agitation/restlessness encourages a holistic approach, considering the environment, physical causes, and the carer’s wellbeing. Ending life-sustaining treatment supports practitioners through a process of considering the benefits of treatment versus quality-of-life and comfort. Finally, a heuristic on providing routine care such as bathing, prompts practitioners to consider adapting the delivery of care, in order to promote comfort and dignity at the end of life.

Conclusions

The heuristics are easy to use and remember, offering a novel approach to decision making for dementia end-of-life care. They have the potential to be used alongside existing end-of-life care recommendations, adding more readily available practical assistance. This is the first study to synthesise experience and existing evidence into easy-to-use heuristics for dementia end-of-life care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Alzheimer’s Disease International: Dementia and Risk Reduction: An analysis of protective and modifiable factors. In. London; 2014.
2.
Matthews FE, Arthur A, Barnes LE, Bond J, Jagger C, Robinson L, Brayne C. A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. Lancet. 2013;382(9902):1405–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Livingston G, Frankish H. A global perspective on dementia care: a Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):933–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Alzheimer’s Disease International: World Alzheimer Report 2015: The Global Impact of Dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. In. Edited by International AsD. London; 2015.
5.
Chan KY, Wang W, Wu JJ, Liu L, Theodoratou E, Car J, Middleton L, Russ TC, Deary IJ, Campbell H, et al. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia in China, 1990–2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9882):2016–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Davies N, Iliffe S. End of life care—why those with dementia have different needs. BMJ. 2016;353:i2171.
7.
Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK, Shaffer ML, Jones RN, Prigerson HG, Volicer L, Givens JL, Hamel MB. The Clinical Course of Advanced Dementia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(16):1529–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
McCarthy M, Addington-Hall J, Altmann D. The experience of dying with dementia: a retrospective study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;12(3):404–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Barclay S, Froggatt K, Crang C, Mathie E, Handley M, Iliffe S, Manthorpe J, Gage H, Goodman C. Living in uncertain times: trajectories to death in residential care homes. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(626):e576–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Guidance on Cancer Services Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer. In. London; 2004.
11.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Quality standard for end of life care for adults. In. London; 2011.
12.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Dementia quality standard. In. London; 2010.
13.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Care of dying adults in the last days of life. In. London; 2015.
14.
National Council for Palliative Care (NCPC): Difficult Conversations for Dementia. In. Edited by National Council for Palliative Care (NCPC). London; 2011: 22.
15.
Department of Health: Living Well with Dementia: A National Dementia Strategy. In. Edited by Health. Do. London; 2009.
16.
Department of Health. End of Life Care Strategy: Promoting High Quality Care for all Adults at the End of Life. London: Department of Health; 2008.
17.
van der Steen JT, Radbruch L, Hertogh CM, de Boer ME, Hughes JC, Larkin P, Francke AL, Jünger S, Gove D, Firth P, et al. White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: A Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliat Med. 2014;28(3):197–209.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Davies N. Quality end of life care for people with dementia: The views and experiences of family carers. London: University College London; 2014.
19.
Davies N, Maio L, Rait G, Iliffe S. Quality end-of-life care for dementia: What have family carers told us so far? A narrative synthesis. Palliat Med. 2014;28(7):919–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Davies N, Manthorpe J, Sampson EL, Iliffe S. After the Liverpool Care Pathway—development of heuristics to guide end of life care for people with dementia: protocol of the ALCP study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008832. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2015-008832.
21.
Radbruch L, Payne S. White paper on standards and norms for hospice and palliative care in Europe: part 1. Eur J Palliat Care. 2009;16:278–89.
22.
Finucane AM, Stevenson B, Moyes R, Oxenham D, Murray SA. Improving end-of-life care in nursing homes: Implementation and evaluation of an intervention to sustain quality of care. Palliat Med. 2013;27(8):772–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Brannstrom M, Furst CJ, Tishelman C, Petzold M, Lindqvist O. Effectiveness of the Liverpool care pathway for the dying in residential care homes: An exploratory, controlled before-and-after study. Palliat Med. 2016;30(1):54–63.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Torjesen I. Bad press over Liverpool care pathway has scared patients and doctors, say experts. Br Med J. 2013;346:f175.CrossRef
25.
Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care: Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA. 2001;286(20):2578–85.CrossRefPubMed
26.
van der Steen JT, Goodman C. What research we no longer need in neurodegenerative disease at the end of life: The case of research in dementia. Palliat Med. 2015;29(3):189–92.CrossRefPubMed
27.
McDonald CJ. Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:56–62.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
Shafir E, Tversky A. Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Congnitive Psychol. 1992;24:449–74.CrossRef
30.
Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D. Understanding patients’ decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA. 1993;270(1):72–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger BA. Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making: A Critical Review Using a Systematic Search Strategy. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35:539–57.CrossRef
32.
Andersson SJ, Lindberg G, Troein M. What shapes GPs’ work with depressed patients? A qualitative interview study. Fam Pract. 2002;19(6):623–31.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Segen J. Concise Dictionary of Modern Medicine. McGraw-Hill: The University of Michigan; 2006.
34.
Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D, Davis J, Louw SJ, Ford GA. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke. 2003;34(1):71–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Kaulio MA. Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: A framework and a review of selected methods. Total Qual Manag. 1998;9(1):141–9.CrossRef
37.
Paton N, Callander R, Cavill M, Ning L, Weavell W. Collaborative quality improvement: consumers, carers and mental health service providers working together in service co-design. Australas Psychiatry. 2013;21(1):78–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Piper D, Iedema R, Gray J, Verma R, Holmes L, Manning N. Utilizing experience-based co-design to improve the experience of patients accessing emergency departments in New South Wales public hospitals: an evaluation study. Health Serv Manage Res. 2012;25(4):162–72.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Boyd H, McKernon S, Mullin B, Old A. Improving healthcare through the use of co-design. J N Z Med Assoc. 2012;125(1357):76–87.
40.
Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(5):307–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):1–274.
42.
Mathew R, Davies N, Manthorpe J, Iliffe S. Making decisions at the end of life when caring for a person with dementia: a literature review to explore the potential use of heuristics in difficult decision-making. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010416. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2015-010416.
43.
Ericsson KA, Simon HA: Protocol analysis. Verbal reports as data, 1st rev. ed. edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993.
44.
Jox RJ, Denke E, Hamann J, Mendel R, Forstl H, Borasio GD. Surrogate decision making for patients with end-stage dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;27(10):1045–52.CrossRefPubMed
45.
van Someren MW, Barnard YF, Sandberg JAC. The think aloud method. A practical guide to modeling cognitive processses. London: Acadmic Press; 1994.
46.
Jones JA. The verbal protocol: a research technique for nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1989;14(12):1062–70.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ. Woking memory. In: Bower GA, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 47–89.
48.
49.
Carney O, McIntosh J, Worth A. The use of the Nominal Group Technique in research with community nurses. J Adv Nurs. 1996;23(5):1024–9.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Palecek EJ, Teno JM, Casarett DJ, Hanson LC, Rhodes RL, Mitchell SL. Comfort Feeding Only: A Proposal to Bring Clarity to Decision-Making Regarding Difficulty with Eating for Persons with Advanced Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(3):580–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Buckingham CD, Adams A. Classifying clinical decision making: interpreting nursing intuition, heuristics and medical diagnosis. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):990–8.PubMed
52.
Mitchell SL, Kiely DK, Hamel MB. Dying with advanced dementia in the nursing home. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(3):321–6.CrossRefPubMed
53.
54.
Elstein AS. Heuristics and biases: selected errors in clinical reasoning. Acad Med. 1999;74:791–4.CrossRefPubMed
55.
van der Steen JT, van Soest-Poortvliet MC, Hallie-Heierman M, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Deliens L, de Boer ME, Van den Block L, van Uden N, Hertogh CM, de Vet HC. Factors associated with initiation of advance care planning in dementia: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(3):743–57.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A co-design process developing heuristics for practitioners providing end of life care for people with dementia
Authors
Nathan Davies
Rammya Mathew
Jane Wilcock
Jill Manthorpe
Elizabeth L. Sampson
Kethakie Lamahewa
Steve Iliffe
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0146-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Palliative Care 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Validity, reliability and responsiveness to change of the Italian palliative care outcome scale: a multicenter study of advanced cancer patients

Research article

Improving end of life care in care homes; an evaluation of the six steps to success programme

Research article

Timely identification of palliative patients and anticipatory care planning by GPs: practical application of tools and a training programme

Research article

Factors influencing the health-related quality of life of Chinese advanced cancer patients and their spousal caregivers: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Identification of hospital patients in need of palliative care – a predictive score

Research article

Physical compared to mental diseases as reasons for committing suicide: a retrospective study