Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Computed Tomography | Research article

The three-dimensional stable mandibular landmarks in patients between the ages of 12.5 and 17.1 years

Authors: Gui Chen, Mona Al Awadi, David William Chambers, Manuel O. Lagravère-Vich, Tianmin Xu, Heesoo Oh

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the aid of implants, Björk identified two-dimensional mandibular stable structures in cephalograms during facial growth. However, we do not know what the three-dimensional stable structures are with certainty. The purpose of this study was to identify the most stable mandibular landmarks in growing patients using three-dimensional images.

Methods

The sample was comprised of two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans taken about 4.6 years apart in 20 growing patients between the ages of 12.5 (T1) and 17.1 years (T2). After head orientation, landmarks were located on the chin (Pog), internal symphysis (Points C, D and E), and mandibular canals, which included the mental foramina (MF and MFA) and mandibular foramina (MdF). The linear distance change between Point C and these landmarks was measured on each CBCT to test stability through time. The reliability of the suggested stable landmarks was also evaluated.

Results

The total distance changes between Point C and points D, E, Pog, MF, and MFA were all less than 1.0 mm from T1 to T2. The reliability measures of these landmarks, which were measured by the Cronbach alpha, were above 0.94 in all three dimensions for each landmark. From T1 to T2, the distance changes from Point C to the right and left mandibular foramina were 3.39 ± 3.29 mm and 3.03 ± 2.83 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

During a growth period that averaged 4.6 years, ranging from 11.2 to 19.8 years old, the structures that appeared relatively stable and could be used in mandibular regional superimpositions included Pog, landmarks on the inferior part of the internal symphysis, and the mental foramen. The centers of the mandibular foramina and the starting points of the mandibular canal underwent significant changes in the transverse and sagittal dimensions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Björk A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13:9–34.CrossRef Björk A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1955;13:9–34.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400–11.CrossRef Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400–11.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5:1–46.CrossRef Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5:1–46.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, Souki BQ, Benavides E, Nguyen T, Luiz RR, et al. 3D mandibular superimposition: comparison of regions of reference for voxel-based registration. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157625.CrossRef Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, Souki BQ, Benavides E, Nguyen T, Luiz RR, et al. 3D mandibular superimposition: comparison of regions of reference for voxel-based registration. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157625.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Signorelli L, Patcas R, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77:9–15.CrossRef Signorelli L, Patcas R, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77:9–15.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Franchi L, Ruellas A, Jackson T. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;153:747–54.CrossRef Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Franchi L, Ruellas A, Jackson T. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;153:747–54.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lagravère MO, Carey J, Heo G, Toogood RW, Major PW. Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;137:304.e1–12. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Heo G, Toogood RW, Major PW. Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;137:304.e1–12.
8.
go back to reference Chambers DW. Alternative methods for evaluating the equivalence of measurement systems. Orthodontics (Chic). 2012;13:192–9. Chambers DW. Alternative methods for evaluating the equivalence of measurement systems. Orthodontics (Chic). 2012;13:192–9.
9.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC, Nanda H, Rajaratnam N. The dependability of behavior measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley; 1972. Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC, Nanda H, Rajaratnam N. The dependability of behavior measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley; 1972.
10.
go back to reference Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:369–75.CrossRef Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:369–75.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Koerich L, Weissheimer A, de Menezes LM, Lindauer SJ. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:473–9.CrossRef Koerich L, Weissheimer A, de Menezes LM, Lindauer SJ. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:473–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Needham Press; 2008. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Needham Press; 2008.
13.
go back to reference Gu Y, McNamara JA Jr. Cephalometric superimpositions. Angle Orthod. 2008;8:967–76.CrossRef Gu Y, McNamara JA Jr. Cephalometric superimpositions. Angle Orthod. 2008;8:967–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Krarup S, Darvann TA, Larsen P, Marsh JL, Kreiborg S. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption. J Anat. 2005;207:669–82.CrossRef Krarup S, Darvann TA, Larsen P, Marsh JL, Kreiborg S. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption. J Anat. 2005;207:669–82.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ghoneima A, Cho H, Farouk K, Kula K. Accuracy and reliability of landmark- based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2017;20(4):227–36.CrossRef Ghoneima A, Cho H, Farouk K, Kula K. Accuracy and reliability of landmark- based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2017;20(4):227–36.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The three-dimensional stable mandibular landmarks in patients between the ages of 12.5 and 17.1 years
Authors
Gui Chen
Mona Al Awadi
David William Chambers
Manuel O. Lagravère-Vich
Tianmin Xu
Heesoo Oh
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01142-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Oral Health 1/2020 Go to the issue