Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Endocrine Disorders 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Diabetes | Research article

Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study

Authors: Tomohiko Ukai, Shuhei Ichikawa, Miho Sekimoto, Satoru Shikata, Yousuke Takemura

Published in: BMC Endocrine Disorders | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

On average, patients in Japan with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a clinical consultation every month, although evidence for a favorable follow-up interval is lacking. This study investigated whether the follow-up interval can be extended by comparing the clinical outcomes and cost for monthly versus bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus.

Methods

We combined administrative claims data from the National Health Insurance and the Health Checkups Program data of Tsu city, Japan between 2011 and 2014 to conduct a retrospective cohort study of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Propensity scores were used to assemble a matched-pairs cohort from patients who had monthly and bimonthly follow-up. Equivalence between two groups was assessed by designating the proportion of patients who maintained good control of their diabetes in the subsequent year as a primary outcome. The proportion achieving target blood pressure and lipid levels, favorable lifestyle, and annual cost were compared as secondary outcomes.

Results

Of 12,145 participants, 693 with monthly follow-up and 693 with bimonthly follow-up were matched using propensity scores. In the monthly follow-up group 654 (94.4%) remained under good diabetic control, versus 658 (95.0%) in the bimonthly group (difference: 0.6%; 95% confidence interval: − 1.8 to 2.9%). All secondary outcomes were equivalent for the monthly and bimonthly follow-up groups except the proportion achieving target blood pressure, the proportion engaging in regular exercise, and annual cost.

Conclusions

For patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus, although frequent follow-up by a physician does not affect the control of blood glucose level in the subsequent year, the annual treatment cost becomes much higher. We suggest that patients with well-controlled diabetes can be followed up less often.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, Van Der Bij AK, Grol R, Feder G. Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(11):1933–9.CrossRef Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, Van Der Bij AK, Grol R, Feder G. Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(11):1933–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matsuda S. Health insurance scheme for the aged in Japan — its outline and challenges, vol. 3; 2009. p. 1):1–9. Matsuda S. Health insurance scheme for the aged in Japan — its outline and challenges, vol. 3; 2009. p. 1):1–9.
6.
go back to reference Emilia J, Robinson A, Kimball AB, Kimball AB. Evidence-Based Guidelines to Determine Follow-up Intervals: A Call for Action. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20 January 2014 1. Emilia J, Robinson A, Kimball AB, Kimball AB. Evidence-Based Guidelines to Determine Follow-up Intervals: A Call for Action. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20 January 2014 1.
8.
go back to reference Ortiz Tobarra MT, Orozco Beltrán D, Gil Guillén V, Terol Moltó C. Frequency of attendance and degree of control of type-2 diabetic patients. Aten Primaria. 2008;40(3):139–44.CrossRef Ortiz Tobarra MT, Orozco Beltrán D, Gil Guillén V, Terol Moltó C. Frequency of attendance and degree of control of type-2 diabetic patients. Aten Primaria. 2008;40(3):139–44.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wermeling PR, Gorter KJ, Stellato RK, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3-monthly versus 6-monthly monitoring of well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients: a pragmatic randomised controlled patient-preference equivalence trial in primary care (EFFIMODI study). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(9):841–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12288.CrossRefPubMed Wermeling PR, Gorter KJ, Stellato RK, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3-monthly versus 6-monthly monitoring of well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients: a pragmatic randomised controlled patient-preference equivalence trial in primary care (EFFIMODI study). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(9):841–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dom.​12288.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):873–90.CrossRef Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):873–90.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wermeling PR, van den Donk M, Gorter KJ, Ardine de Wit G, van der Graaf Y, Rutten GE. Towards a more efficient diabetes control in primary care: six-monthly monitoring compared with three-monthly monitoring in type 2 diabetes - the EFFIMODI trial. Design of a randomised controlled patient-preference equivalence trial in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wermeling PR, van den Donk M, Gorter KJ, Ardine de Wit G, van der Graaf Y, Rutten GE. Towards a more efficient diabetes control in primary care: six-monthly monitoring compared with three-monthly monitoring in type 2 diabetes - the EFFIMODI trial. Design of a randomised controlled patient-preference equivalence trial in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1471-2296-11-35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, et al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996–2013. JAMA. 2016;316(24):2627-46. Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, et al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996–2013. JAMA. 2016;316(24):2627-46.
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of monthly and bimonthly follow-up of patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a propensity score matched cohort study
Authors
Tomohiko Ukai
Shuhei Ichikawa
Miho Sekimoto
Satoru Shikata
Yousuke Takemura
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6823
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0372-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Endocrine Disorders 1/2019 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.