Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Endocrine Disorders 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Development and validation of a Diabetes Risk Score for screening undiagnosed diabetes in Sri Lanka (SLDRISK)

Authors: P. Katulanda, N. R. Hill, I. Stratton, R. Sheriff, S. D. N. De Silva, D. R. Matthews

Published in: BMC Endocrine Disorders | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Screening for undiagnosed diabetes is not widely undertaken due to the high costs and invasiveness of blood sampling. Simple non-invasive tools to identify high risk individuals can facilitate screening. The main objectives of this study are to develop and validate a risk score for screening undiagnosed diabetes among Sri Lankan adults and to compare its performance with the Cambridge Risk Score (CRS), the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) and three other Asian risk scores.

Methods

Data were available from a representative sample of 4276 adults without diagnosed diabetes. In a jack-knife approach two thirds of the sample was used for the development of the risk score and the remainder for the validation. Age, waist circumference, BMI, hypertension, balanitis or vulvitis, family history of diabetes, gestational diabetes, physical activity and osmotic symptoms were significantly associated with undiagnosed diabetes (age most to osmotic symptoms least). Individual scores were generated for these factors using the beta coefficient values obtained in multiple logistic regression. A cut-off value of sum = 31 was determined by ROC curve analysis.

Results

The area under the ROC curve of the risk score for prevalent diabetes was 0.78 (CI 0.73–0.82). In the sample 36.3 % were above the cut-off of 31. A risk score above 31 gave a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 77.9, 65.6, 9.4 and 98.3 % respectively. For Sri Lankans the AUC for the CRS and IDRS were 0.72 and 0.66 repectively.

Conclusions

This simple non-invasive screening tool can identify 80 % of undiagnosed diabetes by selecting 40 % of Sri Lankan adults for confirmatory blood investigations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wild S, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047–53.CrossRefPubMed Wild S, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047–53.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Katulanda P, et al. Prevalence and projections of diabetes and pre-diabetes in adults in Sri Lanka—Sri Lanka Diabetes, Cardiovascular Study (SLDCS). Diabet Med. 2008;25(3):1062–9.CrossRefPubMed Katulanda P, et al. Prevalence and projections of diabetes and pre-diabetes in adults in Sri Lanka—Sri Lanka Diabetes, Cardiovascular Study (SLDCS). Diabet Med. 2008;25(3):1062–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sicree R, Shaw J, Zimmet P. Diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. In: Gan D, editor. Diabetes atlas. Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2006. p. 22–37. Sicree R, Shaw J, Zimmet P. Diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. In: Gan D, editor. Diabetes atlas. Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2006. p. 22–37.
4.
go back to reference Aekplakorn W, et al. Prevalence and management of diabetes and associated risk factors by regions of Thailand: Third National Health Examination Survey 2004. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2007–12.CrossRefPubMed Aekplakorn W, et al. Prevalence and management of diabetes and associated risk factors by regions of Thailand: Third National Health Examination Survey 2004. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):2007–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(6):1263–8.CrossRefPubMed Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(6):1263–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gu D, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in the Chinese adult population: International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia (InterASIA). Diabetologia. 2003;46(9):1190–8.CrossRefPubMed Gu D, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in the Chinese adult population: International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia (InterASIA). Diabetologia. 2003;46(9):1190–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ramachandran A, et al. Temporal changes in prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance associated with lifestyle transition occurring in the rural population in India. Diabetologia. 2004;47(5):860–5.CrossRefPubMed Ramachandran A, et al. Temporal changes in prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance associated with lifestyle transition occurring in the rural population in India. Diabetologia. 2004;47(5):860–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM, Manley SE, Holman RR, Matthews DR, et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(3):297–303.CrossRefPubMed Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM, Manley SE, Holman RR, Matthews DR, et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(3):297–303.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Weerasuriya N, et al. Long-term complications in newly diagnosed Sri Lankan patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. QJM. 1998;91(6):439–43.CrossRefPubMed Weerasuriya N, et al. Long-term complications in newly diagnosed Sri Lankan patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. QJM. 1998;91(6):439–43.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference UKPDS. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.CrossRef UKPDS. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–53.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference UKPDS. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):703–13.CrossRef UKPDS. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):703–13.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Collins R, et al. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9374):2005–16.CrossRefPubMed Collins R, et al. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9374):2005–16.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Holman RR, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89.CrossRefPubMed Holman RR, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–89.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Sargeant LA, Griffin SJ. We should continue talking about screening for Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007;24(8):924. author reply 924–5.CrossRefPubMed Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Sargeant LA, Griffin SJ. We should continue talking about screening for Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007;24(8):924. author reply 924–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Engelgau MM, Narayan KM, Herman WH. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(10):1563–80.CrossRefPubMed Engelgau MM, Narayan KM, Herman WH. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(10):1563–80.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Griffin SJ, et al. Diabetes risk score: towards earlier detection of type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16(3):164–71.CrossRefPubMed Griffin SJ, et al. Diabetes risk score: towards earlier detection of type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16(3):164–71.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stephens JW, Williams R. Time to stop talking about screening for diabetes? Diabet Med. 2006;23(11):1163–4.CrossRefPubMed Stephens JW, Williams R. Time to stop talking about screening for diabetes? Diabet Med. 2006;23(11):1163–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Eborall HC, et al. Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;335(7618):486.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eborall HC, et al. Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;335(7618):486.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Al-Lawati JA, Tuomilehto J. Diabetes risk score in Oman: a tool to identify prevalent type 2 diabetes among Arabs of the Middle East. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77(3):438–44.CrossRefPubMed Al-Lawati JA, Tuomilehto J. Diabetes risk score in Oman: a tool to identify prevalent type 2 diabetes among Arabs of the Middle East. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77(3):438–44.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Glumer C, et al. A Danish diabetes risk score for targeted screening: the Inter99 study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(3):727–33.CrossRefPubMed Glumer C, et al. A Danish diabetes risk score for targeted screening: the Inter99 study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(3):727–33.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J. The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):725–31.CrossRefPubMed Lindstrom J, Tuomilehto J. The diabetes risk score: a practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):725–31.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ramachandran A, et al. Derivation and validation of diabetes risk score for urban Asian Indians. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;70(1):63–70.CrossRefPubMed Ramachandran A, et al. Derivation and validation of diabetes risk score for urban Asian Indians. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;70(1):63–70.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Goodness of fit and regression diagnostics. In: Essential medical statistics. Malden: Blackwell Science; 2003. p. 107–17. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Goodness of fit and regression diagnostics. In: Essential medical statistics. Malden: Blackwell Science; 2003. p. 107–17.
24.
go back to reference Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539–53.CrossRefPubMed Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539–53.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Craig CL, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.CrossRefPubMed Craig CL, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72.CrossRefPubMed Chobanian AV, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ko G, et al. A simple risk score to identify southern Chinese at high risk of diabetes. Diabet Med. 2010;27:644–9.CrossRefPubMed Ko G, et al. A simple risk score to identify southern Chinese at high risk of diabetes. Diabet Med. 2010;27:644–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zhou X, et al. Nonlaboratory-based risk assessment algorithm for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes developed on a nation-wide diabetes survey. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):3944–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou X, et al. Nonlaboratory-based risk assessment algorithm for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes developed on a nation-wide diabetes survey. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):3944–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Aekplakorn W, et al. A risk score for predicting incident diabetes in the Thai population. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1872–7.CrossRefPubMed Aekplakorn W, et al. A risk score for predicting incident diabetes in the Thai population. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1872–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Hussain A, et al. Type 2 diabetes in rural and urban population: diverse prevalence and associated risk factors in Bangladesh. Diabet Med. 2005;22(7):931–6.CrossRefPubMed Hussain A, et al. Type 2 diabetes in rural and urban population: diverse prevalence and associated risk factors in Bangladesh. Diabet Med. 2005;22(7):931–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mohan V, Farooq S, Deepa M. Prevalence of fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes in Chennai in South India. JOP. 2008;9(4):489–92.PubMed Mohan V, Farooq S, Deepa M. Prevalence of fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes in Chennai in South India. JOP. 2008;9(4):489–92.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Mohan V, et al. Urban rural differences in prevalence of self-reported diabetes in India–the WHO-ICMR Indian NCD risk factor surveillance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(1):159–68.CrossRefPubMed Mohan V, et al. Urban rural differences in prevalence of self-reported diabetes in India–the WHO-ICMR Indian NCD risk factor surveillance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(1):159–68.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ramachandran A, et al. High prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors associated with urbanization in India. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(5):893–8.CrossRefPubMed Ramachandran A, et al. High prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors associated with urbanization in India. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(5):893–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Seshiah V, et al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in South India (Tamil Nadu)–a community based study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:329–33.PubMed Seshiah V, et al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in South India (Tamil Nadu)–a community based study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:329–33.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Shera AS, Jawad F, Maqsood A. Prevalence of diabetes in Pakistan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76(2):219–22.CrossRefPubMed Shera AS, Jawad F, Maqsood A. Prevalence of diabetes in Pakistan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76(2):219–22.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Zargar AH, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and other abnormalities of glucose tolerance in young adults aged 20–40 years in North India (Kashmir Valley). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82(2):276–81.CrossRefPubMed Zargar AH, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and other abnormalities of glucose tolerance in young adults aged 20–40 years in North India (Kashmir Valley). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82(2):276–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of a Diabetes Risk Score for screening undiagnosed diabetes in Sri Lanka (SLDRISK)
Authors
P. Katulanda
N. R. Hill
I. Stratton
R. Sheriff
S. D. N. De Silva
D. R. Matthews
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6823
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-016-0124-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Endocrine Disorders 1/2016 Go to the issue