Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Technical advance

How to perform the dusting technique for calcium oxalate stone phantoms during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy

Authors: Jeong Woo Lee, Min Gu Park, Sung Yong Cho

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine the most efficacious setting of Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser with a maximum power output of 120 W with in vitro phantom-stone dusting technique.

Methods

A laser was used to treat two 4 × 3 × 3 mm3 sized phantom stones in 5 mL syringes with 1 mm-sized holes at the bottom. According to the pulse width (short 500, middle 750, long pulse 1000 μsec), maximal pulse repetition rates from 50 to 80 Hz were tested with pulse energy of 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.8 J. Six times of the mean dusting times were measured at each setting. Dusting was performed at continuous firing of the laser until the stones become dusts < 1 mm.

Results

The mean Hounsfield unit of phantom stones was 1309.0 ± 60.8. The laser with long pulse generally showed shorter dusting times than short or middle pulse width. With increasing the pulse energy to 0.5 J, the dusting time decreased. However, the pulse energy of 0.8 J showed longer dusting times than those of 0.5 J. On the post-hoc analysis, the pulse energy of 0.5 J, long pulse width, and the repetition rates of 70 Hz demonstrated significantly shorter dusting times than other settings.

Conclusions

The results suggest that long pulse width with 0.5 J and 70 Hz would be the most efficacious setting for dusting techniques of plaster stone phantoms simulating calcium oxalate stones using the 120 W Ho:YAG laser.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F, Preminger GM, Tiselius HG. Contemporary management of ureter stones. Eur Urol. 2012;61:764–72.CrossRef Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F, Preminger GM, Tiselius HG. Contemporary management of ureter stones. Eur Urol. 2012;61:764–72.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:071403.CrossRef Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:071403.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lee SH, Kim TH, Myung SC, et al. Effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopic stone removal for treating ureteral and ipsilateral renal stones: a single-center experience. Korean J Urol. 2013;54:377–82.CrossRef Lee SH, Kim TH, Myung SC, et al. Effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopic stone removal for treating ureteral and ipsilateral renal stones: a single-center experience. Korean J Urol. 2013;54:377–82.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee JW, Park J, Lee SB, Son H, Cho SY, Jeong H. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones larger than 10 mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urology. 2015;86:873–7.CrossRef Lee JW, Park J, Lee SB, Son H, Cho SY, Jeong H. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones larger than 10 mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urology. 2015;86:873–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015;193:160–4.CrossRef Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015;193:160–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kirac M, Bozkurt ÖF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis. 2013;41:241–6.CrossRef Kirac M, Bozkurt ÖF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis. 2013;41:241–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int. 2012;110:E346–9.CrossRef Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int. 2012;110:E346–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bader MJ, Pongratz T, Khoder W, et al. Impact of pulse duration on ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: fragmentation and dusting performance. World J Urol. 2015;33:471–7.CrossRef Bader MJ, Pongratz T, Khoder W, et al. Impact of pulse duration on ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: fragmentation and dusting performance. World J Urol. 2015;33:471–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wezel F, Häcker A, Gross AJ, Michel MS, Bach T. Effect of pulse energy, frequency and length on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser fragmentation efficiency in non-floating artificial urinary calculi. J Endourol. 2010;24:1135–40.CrossRef Wezel F, Häcker A, Gross AJ, Michel MS, Bach T. Effect of pulse energy, frequency and length on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser fragmentation efficiency in non-floating artificial urinary calculi. J Endourol. 2010;24:1135–40.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chawla SN, Change MF, Chang A, Lenoir J, Bagley DH. Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium:YAG laser stone fragmentation: the “popcorn effect”. J Endourol. 2008;22:645–50.CrossRef Chawla SN, Change MF, Chang A, Lenoir J, Bagley DH. Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium:YAG laser stone fragmentation: the “popcorn effect”. J Endourol. 2008;22:645–50.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sea J, Jonat LM, Chew BH, et al. Optimal power settings for holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 2012;187:914–9.CrossRef Sea J, Jonat LM, Chew BH, et al. Optimal power settings for holmium:YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 2012;187:914–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Spore SS, Teichman JM, Corbin NS, Champion PC, Williamson EA, Glickman RD. Holimium: YAG lithotripasy: optimal power settings. J Endourol. 1999;13:559–66.CrossRef Spore SS, Teichman JM, Corbin NS, Champion PC, Williamson EA, Glickman RD. Holimium: YAG lithotripasy: optimal power settings. J Endourol. 1999;13:559–66.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Corbin NS, Teichman JM, Nguyen T, et al. Laser lithotripsy and cyanide. J Endourol. 2000;14:169–73.CrossRef Corbin NS, Teichman JM, Nguyen T, et al. Laser lithotripsy and cyanide. J Endourol. 2000;14:169–73.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Finley DS, Petersen J, Abdelshehid C, et al. Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro. J Endourol. 2005;19:1041–4.CrossRef Finley DS, Petersen J, Abdelshehid C, et al. Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro. J Endourol. 2005;19:1041–4.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kang HW, Lee H, Teichman JM, Oh J, Kim J, Welch AJ. Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:762–72.CrossRef Kang HW, Lee H, Teichman JM, Oh J, Kim J, Welch AJ. Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:762–72.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lee HJ, Box GN, Abraham JB, et al. In vitro evaluation of nitinol urological retrieval coli and ureteral occlusion device: retropulsion and holmium laser fragmentation efficiency. J Urol. 2008;180:969–73.CrossRef Lee HJ, Box GN, Abraham JB, et al. In vitro evaluation of nitinol urological retrieval coli and ureteral occlusion device: retropulsion and holmium laser fragmentation efficiency. J Urol. 2008;180:969–73.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Marguet CG, Sung JC, Springhart WP, et al. In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmentation of the frequency doubled, double pulse nd:yag laser and the holmium:yag laser. J Urol. 2005;173:1797–800.CrossRef Marguet CG, Sung JC, Springhart WP, et al. In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmentation of the frequency doubled, double pulse nd:yag laser and the holmium:yag laser. J Urol. 2005;173:1797–800.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patel AP, Knudsen BE. Optimizing use of the holmium:YAG laser for surgical management of urinary lithiasis. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:397.CrossRef Patel AP, Knudsen BE. Optimizing use of the holmium:YAG laser for surgical management of urinary lithiasis. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15:397.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tracey J, Gagin G, Morhardt D, Hollingsworth J, Ghani KR. Ureteroscopic high-frequency dusting utilizing a 120-W holmium laser. J Endourol. 2018;32:290–5.CrossRef Tracey J, Gagin G, Morhardt D, Hollingsworth J, Ghani KR. Ureteroscopic high-frequency dusting utilizing a 120-W holmium laser. J Endourol. 2018;32:290–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How to perform the dusting technique for calcium oxalate stone phantoms during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy
Authors
Jeong Woo Lee
Min Gu Park
Sung Yong Cho
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0417-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Urology 1/2018 Go to the issue