Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Efficacy analysis of self-help position therapy after holmium laser lithotripsy via flexible ureteroscopy

Authors: Jie Yang, Rong-zhen Tao, Pei Lu, Meng-xing Chen, Xin-kun Huang, Ke-liang Chen, Ying-heng Huang, Xiao-rong He, Li-di Wan, Jing Wang, Xin Tang, Wei Zhang

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To observe the efficacy of self-help position therapy (SHPT) after holmium laser lithotripsy via flexible ureteroscopy (FURS).

Methods

From January 2010 to November 2015, 736 nephrolithiasis patients who had received FURS lithotripsy were analyzed retrospectively. In position group, 220 cases accepted SHPT after lithotripsies, and 428 cases as control, coming from another independent inpatient area in the same center. The stone-free status (SFS) between two groups were compared at the 2nd, 4th and 12th week ends by X-ray examinations.

Results

The preoperative incidence of hydronephrosis (25.9% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.018) or lower calyceal seeper (33.6% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.012) and the proportion of patients with > 2.0 cm stones (33.6% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.003) were all significantly higher in position group than in control group. There were no substantial difference between two groups in age, BMI, gender and medical histories. In postoperative followup, the incidence of hydronephrosis in position group was significantly lower than in control group (9.5% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.032) after removing double-J stents. In position group, the SFS of the 2nd week end (60.9% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.001), the 4th week end (74.1% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.004) and the 12th week end (86.9% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.021) were all significantly higher than those in control group.

Conclusions

SHPT after holmium laser lithotripsy via FURS may increase postoperative SFS, accelerate stone fragment clearance, and decrease the incidence of hydronephrosis after removal of double-J stents. The therapy does not require professional assistance and is economical, simple, and effective.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1996;68:203–49.PubMed Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1996;68:203–49.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Zeng Q, He Y. Age-specific prevalence of kidney stones in Chinese urban inhabitants. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(1):91–3.CrossRefPubMed Zeng Q, He Y. Age-specific prevalence of kidney stones in Chinese urban inhabitants. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(1):91–3.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology: Arnhem; 2013. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology: Arnhem; 2013.
4.
go back to reference Na YQ, Ye ZQ, Sun ZY, et al. The guideline of Chinese Association of Urology. Chinese Association of Urology: Beijing; 2011. p. 209. Na YQ, Ye ZQ, Sun ZY, et al. The guideline of Chinese Association of Urology. Chinese Association of Urology: Beijing; 2011. p. 209.
5.
go back to reference Xu C, Song RJ, Jiang MJ, Qin C, Wang XL, Zhang W. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients. Urol Int. 2015;94(1):93–8.CrossRefPubMed Xu C, Song RJ, Jiang MJ, Qin C, Wang XL, Zhang W. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients. Urol Int. 2015;94(1):93–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, et al. Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible Ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the Management of Renal Stones. Urology. 2015;86(2):224–9.CrossRefPubMed Ding J, Xu D, Cao Q, et al. Comparing the efficacy of a multimodular flexible Ureteroscope with its conventional counterpart in the Management of Renal Stones. Urology. 2015;86(2):224–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt P, et al. Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. Urology. 2012;80:1198–202.CrossRefPubMed Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt P, et al. Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. Urology. 2012;80:1198–202.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Osman Y, Harraz AM, El-Nahas AR, et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments: an acceptable term in the computed tomography era? Urology. 2013;81(4):723–6.CrossRefPubMed Osman Y, Harraz AM, El-Nahas AR, et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments: an acceptable term in the computed tomography era? Urology. 2013;81(4):723–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Management of residual stones. The Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27(2):347–54. 10778476CrossRefPubMed Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Management of residual stones. The Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27(2):347–54. 10778476CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010;24(10):1583–8.CrossRefPubMed Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010;24(10):1583–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Burr J, Ishii H, Simmonds N, Somani BK. Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: comparative outcomes from a university hospital over similar time period. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(2):183–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burr J, Ishii H, Simmonds N, Somani BK. Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: comparative outcomes from a university hospital over similar time period. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(2):183–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Kosar A, Ozturk A, Serel TA, et al. Effect of vibration massage therapy after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with lower caliceal stones. J Endourol. 1999;13:705.CrossRefPubMed Kosar A, Ozturk A, Serel TA, et al. Effect of vibration massage therapy after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with lower caliceal stones. J Endourol. 1999;13:705.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sampaio FJ, Aragao AH. Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol. 1994;8:241.CrossRefPubMed Sampaio FJ, Aragao AH. Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol. 1994;8:241.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ, Weir MJ, RJ DAH. Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2001;166(6):2065–71.CrossRefPubMed Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ, Weir MJ, RJ DAH. Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2001;166(6):2065–71.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM, Liang S, Kamaraj R, Esuvaranathan K. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology. 2005;65(6):1070–4.CrossRefPubMed Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM, Liang S, Kamaraj R, Esuvaranathan K. Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology. 2005;65(6):1070–4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tiselius H-G, Andersson A. Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol. 2003;43:275–81.CrossRefPubMed Tiselius H-G, Andersson A. Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol. 2003;43:275–81.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ghani KR, Wolf JS Jr. What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones? Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(7):363.CrossRefPubMed Ghani KR, Wolf JS Jr. What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones? Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12(7):363.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dauw CA, Simeon L, Alruwaily AF, et al. Contemporary practice patterns of flexible Ureteroscopy for treating renal stones: results of a worldwide survey. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1221–30. Dauw CA, Simeon L, Alruwaily AF, et al. Contemporary practice patterns of flexible Ureteroscopy for treating renal stones: results of a worldwide survey. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1221–30.
20.
go back to reference Huang ZC, Fu FJ, Zhong ZH, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for bilateral multiple intrarenal stones: is this a valuable choice? Urology. 2012;80:800–4.CrossRefPubMed Huang ZC, Fu FJ, Zhong ZH, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for bilateral multiple intrarenal stones: is this a valuable choice? Urology. 2012;80:800–4.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wen CC, Nakada SY. Treatment selection and outcomes: renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):409–19.CrossRefPubMed Wen CC, Nakada SY. Treatment selection and outcomes: renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):409–19.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008;179(3):981–4.CrossRefPubMed Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008;179(3):981–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Xu G, Wen J, Li Z, et al. A comparative study to analyze the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser lithotripsy for residual calculi after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(3):4501–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Xu G, Wen J, Li Z, et al. A comparative study to analyze the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser lithotripsy for residual calculi after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(3):4501–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Ozgor F, Simsek A, Binbay M, et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(6):533–8.CrossRefPubMed Ozgor F, Simsek A, Binbay M, et al. Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(6):533–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wolf JS Jr. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones? Int Braz J Urol. 2002;28(6):572–3.PubMed Wolf JS Jr. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones? Int Braz J Urol. 2002;28(6):572–3.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy analysis of self-help position therapy after holmium laser lithotripsy via flexible ureteroscopy
Authors
Jie Yang
Rong-zhen Tao
Pei Lu
Meng-xing Chen
Xin-kun Huang
Ke-liang Chen
Ying-heng Huang
Xiao-rong He
Li-di Wan
Jing Wang
Xin Tang
Wei Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0348-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Urology 1/2018 Go to the issue