Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Spinal Stenosis | Research article

Clinical effect evaluation and correlation between preoperative imaging parameters and clinical effect of endoscopic Transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis

Authors: Lijun Li, Feng Chang, Yong Hai, Jincai Yang, Cheng Xu, Jie Yuan, Jiuqiang Sun, Qinghua Wang, Shengqiang Ding, Xiaowen Yang

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect and correlation between preoperative imaging parameters and the clinical effect of endoscopic transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Methods

In this prospective study, 87 patients from Shanxi Province People’s Hospital met the criteria for lumbar spinal stenosis and were recruited from June 2014 to January 2016. These patients underwent endoscopic transforaminal decompression. The clinical symptoms were evaluated by VAS, ODI, and claudication at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The overall clinical efficacy was evaluated using the MacNab score. Yellow ligament thickness and area of the dural sac were examined by MRI. Bony vertebral canal area, real spinal canal area, nerve root canal bony area, nerve root canal real area, distance between the articular joints, and vertebral canal sagittal diameter were examined by CT. The soft tissue invasion ratio of the vertebral canal and the invasion ratio of the nerve root canal were calculated. Correlations between imaging parameters and age, sex, and clinical efficacy were examined.

Results

The MacNab scores were excellent in 47% of cases, good in 34%, generally good in 8%, and poor in 11%. VAS, ODI, and claudication were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values (P < 0.01). A significant difference was observed between the 71–81 year age group and the other age groups (P < 0.05). There were good correlations between clinical efficacy and vertebral canal sagittal diameter, distance between the articular joints, soft tissue invasion ratio of the vertebral canal, and invasion ratio of the nerve root canal.

Conclusion

Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by endoscopic transforaminal decompression can achieve good clinical results. This operation is less effective in patients older than 71 years of age. There were positive correlations between clinical efficacy and the vertebral canal sagittal diameter, the articular joints, soft tissue invasion ratio of the vertebral canal, and invasion ratio of the nerve root canal.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Tillotson M, Burton K. Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech. 1997;12(Suppl 1):S1–S63.CrossRef Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Tillotson M, Burton K. Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech. 1997;12(Suppl 1):S1–S63.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society. 2003;4(7):407–14.CrossRef Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society. 2003;4(7):407–14.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Woodforde JM, Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain. J Psychosom Res. 1972;16(3):173–8.CrossRef Woodforde JM, Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain. J Psychosom Res. 1972;16(3):173–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference van Hooff ML, Spruit M, Fairbank JC, van Limbeek J, Jacobs WC. The Oswestry disability index (version 2.1a): validation of a Dutch language version. Spine. 2015;40(2):E83–90.CrossRef van Hooff ML, Spruit M, Fairbank JC, van Limbeek J, Jacobs WC. The Oswestry disability index (version 2.1a): validation of a Dutch language version. Spine. 2015;40(2):E83–90.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–52 discussion 2952.CrossRef Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–52 discussion 2952.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(5):891–903.CrossRef Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(5):891–903.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Carreon LY, Bratcher KR, Canan CE, Burke LO, Djurasovic M, Glassman SD. Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2013;18(1):102–6.CrossRef Carreon LY, Bratcher KR, Canan CE, Burke LO, Djurasovic M, Glassman SD. Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2013;18(1):102–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Polikandriotis JA, Hudak EM, Perry MW. Minimally invasive surgery through endoscopic laminotomy and foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop. 2013;10(1):13–6.CrossRef Polikandriotis JA, Hudak EM, Perry MW. Minimally invasive surgery through endoscopic laminotomy and foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop. 2013;10(1):13–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ahn Y. Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Expert review of medical devices. 2014;11(6):605–16.CrossRef Ahn Y. Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Expert review of medical devices. 2014;11(6):605–16.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lawrence MM, Hayek SM. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(5):573–9.CrossRef Lawrence MM, Hayek SM. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26(5):573–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Xu B. Selection and application of PELD and MED for treatment of lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Tianjin Med. 2015;43(11):1239–43. Xu B. Selection and application of PELD and MED for treatment of lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Tianjin Med. 2015;43(11):1239–43.
12.
go back to reference Zhang Q, Shen H, Rong Y. A study on the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis by CT. Chin J Spinal Cord. 2007;17(6):422–5. Zhang Q, Shen H, Rong Y. A study on the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis by CT. Chin J Spinal Cord. 2007;17(6):422–5.
13.
go back to reference Liu SJ: [Relationship between a sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal and spondylosis: analysis of radiographic measurement in 400 cases]. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] 1982, 20(8):492–495. Liu SJ: [Relationship between a sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal and spondylosis: analysis of radiographic measurement in 400 cases]. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] 1982, 20(8):492–495.
14.
go back to reference Guo S, Chen Z, Qiu J. The relationship between lumbar nerve channel and lumbar pain. Chin J Orthoped. 1981;7(4):241–7. Guo S, Chen Z, Qiu J. The relationship between lumbar nerve channel and lumbar pain. Chin J Orthoped. 1981;7(4):241–7.
15.
go back to reference Ahn Y, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim JU, Liu WC. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration. Acta Neurochir. 2009;151(3):199–206.CrossRef Ahn Y, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim JU, Liu WC. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration. Acta Neurochir. 2009;151(3):199–206.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Karakasli A, Yildiz DV, Kumtepe E, Kizmazoglu C, Havitcioglu H: Biomechanical comparison of intact lumbar lamb spine and endoscopic discectomized lamb spine. Eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = Joint diseases & related surgery 2013, 24(1):33–38. Karakasli A, Yildiz DV, Kumtepe E, Kizmazoglu C, Havitcioglu H: Biomechanical comparison of intact lumbar lamb spine and endoscopic discectomized lamb spine. Eklem hastaliklari ve cerrahisi = Joint diseases & related surgery 2013, 24(1):33–38.
17.
go back to reference Peng CW, Yeo W, Tan SB. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical and quality of life outcomes with a minimum 2 year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2009;4:20.CrossRef Peng CW, Yeo W, Tan SB. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: clinical and quality of life outcomes with a minimum 2 year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2009;4:20.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hirano Y, Mizuno J, Takeda M, Itoh Y, Matsuoka H, Watanabe K. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy - early clinical experience. Neurol Med Chir. 2012;52(9):625–30.CrossRef Hirano Y, Mizuno J, Takeda M, Itoh Y, Matsuoka H, Watanabe K. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy - early clinical experience. Neurol Med Chir. 2012;52(9):625–30.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Choi I, Ahn JO, So WS, Lee SJ, Choi IJ, Kim H. Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2013;22(11):2481–7.CrossRef Choi I, Ahn JO, So WS, Lee SJ, Choi IJ, Kim H. Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2013;22(11):2481–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ahn Y. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert review of medical devices. 2012;9(4):361–6.CrossRef Ahn Y. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: technical tips to prevent complications. Expert review of medical devices. 2012;9(4):361–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Srinivasan D, Than KD, Wang AC, La Marca F, Wang PI, Schermerhorn TC, Park P. Radiation safety and spine surgery: systematic review of exposure limits and methods to minimize radiation exposure. World neurosurgery. 2014;82(6):1337–43.CrossRef Srinivasan D, Than KD, Wang AC, La Marca F, Wang PI, Schermerhorn TC, Park P. Radiation safety and spine surgery: systematic review of exposure limits and methods to minimize radiation exposure. World neurosurgery. 2014;82(6):1337–43.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical effect evaluation and correlation between preoperative imaging parameters and clinical effect of endoscopic Transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
Authors
Lijun Li
Feng Chang
Yong Hai
Jincai Yang
Cheng Xu
Jie Yuan
Jiuqiang Sun
Qinghua Wang
Shengqiang Ding
Xiaowen Yang
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Spinal Stenosis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3076-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue