Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Computed Tomography | Technical advance

The method for measurement of the three-dimensional scoliosis angle from standard radiographs

Authors: Paweł Główka, Wojciech Politarczyk, Piotr Janusz, Łukasz Woźniak, Tomasz Kotwicki

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Three-dimensional idiopathic scoliosis cannot be accurately assessed with the aid of a single plane parameter – the Cobb angle. We propose a novel method for evaluating the three-dimensional (3D) pattern of scoliosis based on two X-rays (PA and lateral). The proposed method consists of the measurements of the angles between the upper endplate of the upper-end vertebra and the lower endplate of the lower-end vertebra (3D scoliosis angle).

Methods

The 3D-angles of thirty scoliosis curves were measured with either computed tomography (CT) or digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs): PA and lateral. CT was used as a reference. In the case of CT, the 3D angle was calculated based on the coordinates of three points situated on the upper endplate and those of three points situated on the lower endplate of the scoliosis curve. In the case of the DRR, the 3D angle was calculated using the four-angle method: the angles formed by the endplates of the curve with the transverse plane. The results were tested with the Student’s t-test, and the agreement of measurements was tested with the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results

There was no significant difference between the 3D-angle measurements obtained with DRRs versus CT, p > 0.05. There was, however, a significant difference between the 3D-scoliosis angle and the Cobb angle measurements performed based on the X-rays. The reproducibility and reliability of 3D angle measurements were high.

Conclusions

Based on two standard radiographs, PA and lateral, it is possible to calculate the 3D scoliosis angle. The proposed method facilitates 3D-scoliosis assessment without the use of sophisticated devices. Considering the 3D nature of AIS, the 3D parameters of the spine may help to apply a more effective treatment and estimate a more precise prognosis for patient with scoliosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hattori T, Sakaura H, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. In vivo three-dimensional segmental analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1745–50.CrossRef Hattori T, Sakaura H, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. In vivo three-dimensional segmental analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:1745–50.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Donzelli S, Poma S, Balzarini L, Boroni A, Respizzi S, Villafane JH. State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:91.CrossRef Donzelli S, Poma S, Balzarini L, Boroni A, Respizzi S, Villafane JH. State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:91.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nault ML, Mac-Thiong JM, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I, Deguise J, Labelle H. Three-dimensional spinal morphology can differentiate between progressive and nonprogressive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at the initial presentation: a prospective study. Spine. 2014;39:601–6.CrossRef Nault ML, Mac-Thiong JM, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I, Deguise J, Labelle H. Three-dimensional spinal morphology can differentiate between progressive and nonprogressive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at the initial presentation: a prospective study. Spine. 2014;39:601–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Labelle H, Aubin CE, Jackson R, Lenke L, Newton P, Parent S. Seeing the spine in 3D: how will it change what we do? J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:37–45.CrossRef Labelle H, Aubin CE, Jackson R, Lenke L, Newton P, Parent S. Seeing the spine in 3D: how will it change what we do? J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:37–45.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pasha S, Cahill PJ, Dormans JP, Flynn JM. Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of the spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:3137–45.CrossRef Pasha S, Cahill PJ, Dormans JP, Flynn JM. Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of the spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:3137–45.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Sangole AP, Aubin CE. Classification of scoliosis deformity 3-d spinal shape by cluster analysis. Spine. 2009;34:584–90.CrossRef Stokes IA, Sangole AP, Aubin CE. Classification of scoliosis deformity 3-d spinal shape by cluster analysis. Spine. 2009;34:584–90.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kohashi Y, Oga M, Sugioka Y. A new method using top views of the spine to predict the progression of curves in idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Spine. 1996;21:212–7.CrossRef Kohashi Y, Oga M, Sugioka Y. A new method using top views of the spine to predict the progression of curves in idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Spine. 1996;21:212–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Poncet P, Dansereau J, Labelle H. Geometric torsion in idiopathic scoliosis: three-dimensional analysis and proposal for a new classification. Spine. 2001;26:2235–43.CrossRef Poncet P, Dansereau J, Labelle H. Geometric torsion in idiopathic scoliosis: three-dimensional analysis and proposal for a new classification. Spine. 2001;26:2235–43.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Negrini S, Atanasio S, Fusco C, Zaina F, Negrini A. 3-DEMO classification of scoliosis: a useful understanding of the 3(rd) dimension of the deformity. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:139–53.PubMed Negrini S, Atanasio S, Fusco C, Zaina F, Negrini A. 3-DEMO classification of scoliosis: a useful understanding of the 3(rd) dimension of the deformity. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:139–53.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kotwicki T, Negrini S, Grivas TB, Rigo M, Maruyama T, Durmala J. Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities-6th SOSORT consensus paper. Scoli Spinal Disord. 2009;4:1. Kotwicki T, Negrini S, Grivas TB, Rigo M, Maruyama T, Durmala J. Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities-6th SOSORT consensus paper. Scoli Spinal Disord. 2009;4:1.
11.
go back to reference Kim H, Kim HS, Moon ES, Yoon CS, Chung TS, Song HT. Scoliosis imaging: what radiologists should know. Radiographics. 2010;30:1823–42.CrossRef Kim H, Kim HS, Moon ES, Yoon CS, Chung TS, Song HT. Scoliosis imaging: what radiologists should know. Radiographics. 2010;30:1823–42.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ilharreborde B, Ferrero E, Alison M, Mazda K. EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:526–31.CrossRef Ilharreborde B, Ferrero E, Alison M, Mazda K. EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:526–31.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R, Yang H, Stirk L, Gummerson N. EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:1–188.CrossRef McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R, Yang H, Stirk L, Gummerson N. EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:1–188.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gaweł D, Główka P, Nowak M. Digitally reconstructed radiograph procedure for pre-operative evaluation. J Mech Trans Engin. 2014;66:31–7. Gaweł D, Główka P, Nowak M. Digitally reconstructed radiograph procedure for pre-operative evaluation. J Mech Trans Engin. 2014;66:31–7.
15.
go back to reference Główka P, Gaweł D, Kasprzak B, Nowak M, Kotwicki T. Improvement in scoliosis top view: evaluation of vertebrae localization in Scoliotic spine-spine axial presentation. Symmetry. 2016;8:125.CrossRef Główka P, Gaweł D, Kasprzak B, Nowak M, Kotwicki T. Improvement in scoliosis top view: evaluation of vertebrae localization in Scoliotic spine-spine axial presentation. Symmetry. 2016;8:125.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vince J. Geometry for computer graphics formulae, Examples and Proofs. London: Springer-Verlag; 2005. ISBN 1-85233-834-2. Vince J. Geometry for computer graphics formulae, Examples and Proofs. London: Springer-Verlag; 2005. ISBN 1-85233-834-2.
17.
go back to reference Tyrakowski M, Janusz P, Mardjetko S, Kotwicki T, Siemionow K. Comparison of radiographic sagittal spinopelvic alignment between skeletally immature and skeletally mature individuals with Scheuermann’s disease. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1237–43.CrossRef Tyrakowski M, Janusz P, Mardjetko S, Kotwicki T, Siemionow K. Comparison of radiographic sagittal spinopelvic alignment between skeletally immature and skeletally mature individuals with Scheuermann’s disease. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1237–43.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurements scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68:319–23.CrossRef Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurements scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68:319–23.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Stat Med. 2012;31:3972–81.CrossRef Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance. Stat Med. 2012;31:3972–81.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stagnara P. Spinal Deformity (Trans J Dove). London: Butterworths; 1998. p. 16–23. Stagnara P. Spinal Deformity (Trans J Dove). London: Butterworths; 1998. p. 16–23.
21.
go back to reference Grunert S, Brückl R, Rosemeyer B. Rippstein and Müller roentgenologic determination of the actual femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angle. 1: correction of the conversion table and study of the effects of positioning errors. Der Radiologie. 1986;26:293–304. Grunert S, Brückl R, Rosemeyer B. Rippstein and Müller roentgenologic determination of the actual femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angle. 1: correction of the conversion table and study of the effects of positioning errors. Der Radiologie. 1986;26:293–304.
Metadata
Title
The method for measurement of the three-dimensional scoliosis angle from standard radiographs
Authors
Paweł Główka
Wojciech Politarczyk
Piotr Janusz
Łukasz Woźniak
Tomasz Kotwicki
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03494-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue