Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis

Authors: Isabel B. Rodrigues, Jonathan D. Adachi, Karen A. Beattie, Joy C. MacDermid

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the widely known benefits of exercise and physical activity, adherence rates to these activities are poor. Understanding exercise facilitators, barriers, and preferences may provide an opportunity to personalize exercise prescription and improve adherence. The purpose of this study was to develop the Personalized Exercise Questionnaire (PEQ) to identify these facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis.

Methods

This study comprises two phases, instrument design and judgmental evidence. A panel of 42 experts was used to validate the instrument through quantitative (content validity) and qualitative (cognitive interviewing) methods. Content Validity Index (CVI) is the most commonly used method to calculate content validity quantitatively. There are two kinds of CVI: Item-CVI (I-CVI) and Scale-level CVI (S-CVI).

Results

Preliminary versions of this tool showed high content validity of individual items (I-CVI range: 0.50 to 1.00) and moderate to high overall content validity of the PEQ (S-CVI/UA = 0.63; S-CVI/Ave = 0.91). Through qualitative methods, items were improved until saturation was achieved. The tool consists of 6 domains and 38 questions. The 6 domains are: 1) support network; 2) access; 3) goals; 4) preferences; 5) feedback and tracking; and 6) barriers. There are 35 categorical questions and 3 open-ended items.

Conclusions

Using an iterative approach, the development and evaluation of the PEQ demonstrated high item-content validity for assessing the facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. Upon further validation it is expected that this measure might be used to develop more client-centered exercise programs, and potentially improve adherence.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(8):1137–41.CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(8):1137–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cheung AM, Detsky AS. Osteoporosis and fractures: missing the bridge? J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299:1468–70.CrossRef Cheung AM, Detsky AS. Osteoporosis and fractures: missing the bridge? J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299:1468–70.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fahy AS, Wong F, Kunasingam K, Neen D, Dockery F, Ajuied A, et al. A review of hip fracture mortality — why and how does such a large proportion of these elderly patients Die ? Surg Sci. 2014;5:227–32.CrossRef Fahy AS, Wong F, Kunasingam K, Neen D, Dockery F, Ajuied A, et al. A review of hip fracture mortality — why and how does such a large proportion of these elderly patients Die ? Surg Sci. 2014;5:227–32.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Osteoporosis Canada. Osteoporosis Facts & Statistics. 2016. Osteoporosis Canada. Osteoporosis Facts & Statistics. 2016.
6.
go back to reference Hamilton CJ, Swan VJD, Jamal SA. The effects of exercise and physical activity participation on bone mass and geometry in postmenopausal women : a systematic review of pQCT studies. Osteoporosis Int. 2010;21(1):11–23.CrossRef Hamilton CJ, Swan VJD, Jamal SA. The effects of exercise and physical activity participation on bone mass and geometry in postmenopausal women : a systematic review of pQCT studies. Osteoporosis Int. 2010;21(1):11–23.CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Dishman R. Advances in exercise adherence. Champaign: Kinetics, Human; 1994. p. 49. Dishman R. Advances in exercise adherence. Champaign: Kinetics, Human; 1994. p. 49.
9.
go back to reference De Kam D, Smulders E, Weerdesteyn V. Exercise interventions to reduce fall-related fractures and their risk factors in individuals with low bone density : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(12):2111–25.CrossRefPubMed De Kam D, Smulders E, Weerdesteyn V. Exercise interventions to reduce fall-related fractures and their risk factors in individuals with low bone density : a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(12):2111–25.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.PubMedPubMedCentral Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Sechrist KR, Walker SN, Pender NJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the exercise benefit/barriers scale. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10(6):357–65.CrossRefPubMed Sechrist KR, Walker SN, Pender NJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the exercise benefit/barriers scale. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10(6):357–65.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Crombie I, Irvine I, Williams B, McGinnis AR, Slane PW, Alder EM, McMurdo M. Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity : a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age Ageing. 2004;33(3):287–92.CrossRefPubMed Crombie I, Irvine I, Williams B, McGinnis AR, Slane PW, Alder EM, McMurdo M. Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity : a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age Ageing. 2004;33(3):287–92.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Stein KF, Sargent JT, Rafaels N. Intervention research. Establishing Fidelity of the independent variable in nursing clinical trails. Nurs Res. 2007;56(1):54–62.CrossRefPubMed Stein KF, Sargent JT, Rafaels N. Intervention research. Establishing Fidelity of the independent variable in nursing clinical trails. Nurs Res. 2007;56(1):54–62.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Armstrong TS, Cohen MZ, Eriksen L, Cleeland C. Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: an illustration from the development of the brain tumor module of the M.D. Anderson symptom inventory. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32(3):669–76.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong TS, Cohen MZ, Eriksen L, Cleeland C. Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: an illustration from the development of the brain tumor module of the M.D. Anderson symptom inventory. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32(3):669–76.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi- H. Design and implementation content validity Study : development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4(5):165–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi- H. Design and implementation content validity Study : development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4(5):165–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Rodrigues IB, Armstrong JJ, Adachi JD, MacDermid JC. Facilitators and barriers to exercise adherence in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(3):735–45.CrossRefPubMed Rodrigues IB, Armstrong JJ, Adachi JD, MacDermid JC. Facilitators and barriers to exercise adherence in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(3):735–45.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Baert V, Gorus E, Mets T, Bautmans I. Motivators and barriers for physical activity in older adults with osteoporosis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015;38:105–14.CrossRefPubMed Baert V, Gorus E, Mets T, Bautmans I. Motivators and barriers for physical activity in older adults with osteoporosis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015;38:105–14.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Callaghan S. Focus group report: physical activity and women 55–70. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Association for the Advancement of Women and Sport and Physical; 2007. Callaghan S. Focus group report: physical activity and women 55–70. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Association for the Advancement of Women and Sport and Physical; 2007.
20.
go back to reference Hellstern LM. The management training program: An intervention aimed at increasing exercise participation and exercise adherence (unpublished master dissertation). Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta; 1999. Hellstern LM. The management training program: An intervention aimed at increasing exercise participation and exercise adherence (unpublished master dissertation). Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta; 1999.
21.
go back to reference Wocken KM. Exercise adherence in older adults (National Conference of undergraduate research). Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota; 2013. Wocken KM. Exercise adherence in older adults (National Conference of undergraduate research). Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota; 2013.
22.
go back to reference Dobson F, Bennell K, French S, Nicolson P, Klaasman R, MA H, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise participation in people with hip and / or synthesis of the literature using behavior change theory. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(5):372–89.PubMed Dobson F, Bennell K, French S, Nicolson P, Klaasman R, MA H, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise participation in people with hip and / or synthesis of the literature using behavior change theory. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(5):372–89.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Rodrigues I, Missiuna C, Macdermid JA. Theoretical perspective on exercise adherence and osteoporosis using the theory of planned behavior and the social cognitive theory. Critical Rev Physical Rehab Med. 2016;28:37–49. Rodrigues I, Missiuna C, Macdermid JA. Theoretical perspective on exercise adherence and osteoporosis using the theory of planned behavior and the social cognitive theory. Critical Rev Physical Rehab Med. 2016;28:37–49.
25.
go back to reference Vasudevan V, Rimmer JH, Kviz F. Development of the barriers to physical activity questionnaire for people with mobility impairments. Disabil Health J. 2015;8(4):547–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vasudevan V, Rimmer JH, Kviz F. Development of the barriers to physical activity questionnaire for people with mobility impairments. Disabil Health J. 2015;8(4):547–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Collins D. Pretest survey instruents: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(3):229–38.CrossRefPubMed Collins D. Pretest survey instruents: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(3):229–38.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Saw SM, Ng TP. The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research. Singap Med J. 2001;42(3):131–5. Saw SM, Ng TP. The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research. Singap Med J. 2001;42(3):131–5.
28.
go back to reference Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17). Sage publications. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment (Vol. 17). Sage publications.
30.
go back to reference Yamada J, Stevens B, Sidani S, Watt-Watson J, De Silva N. Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs. 2010;7(3):158–64.CrossRef Yamada J, Stevens B, Sidani S, Watt-Watson J, De Silva N. Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs. 2010;7(3):158–64.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference A.Wynd C, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res 25(5):508–518. A.Wynd C, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res 25(5):508–518.
32.
go back to reference Haeger H, Lambert AD, Kinzie J, Gieser J. Using cognitive interviews to improve survey instruments. New Orleans: Association for Institutional Research; 2012. Haeger H, Lambert AD, Kinzie J, Gieser J. Using cognitive interviews to improve survey instruments. New Orleans: Association for Institutional Research; 2012.
33.
go back to reference Daugherty, S., Harris-Kojetin, L., Squire, C., Jaël, E., & Harris-Kojetin, L. (2001). Maximizing the quality of cognitive interviewing data: an exploration of three approaches and their informational contributions. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association. Daugherty, S., Harris-Kojetin, L., Squire, C., Jaël, E., & Harris-Kojetin, L. (2001). Maximizing the quality of cognitive interviewing data: an exploration of three approaches and their informational contributions. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association.
34.
go back to reference Wilkinson S. Focus group methodology: a review. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 1998;1(3):181–203.CrossRef Wilkinson S. Focus group methodology: a review. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 1998;1(3):181–203.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–75.CrossRef Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–75.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Mullen SP, Olson EA, Phillips SM, Szabo AN, Wójcicki TR, Mailey EL, et al. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. Int J Behav Nutri Phys Activity. 2011;8:103. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-103 Mullen SP, Olson EA, Phillips SM, Szabo AN, Wójcicki TR, Mailey EL, et al. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. Int J Behav Nutri Phys Activity. 2011;8:103. doi:10.​1186/​1479-5868-8-103
37.
go back to reference Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity Index : are you sure you know what ’ s being Reported ? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–97.CrossRefPubMed Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity Index : are you sure you know what ’ s being Reported ? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–97.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity — establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes ( PRO ) instruments for medical product Evaluation : ISPOR PRO good research practices task force Report : part 2 — assessing respondent understanding. Journal. Value Health. 2011;14(8):978–88. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013 Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity — establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes ( PRO ) instruments for medical product Evaluation : ISPOR PRO good research practices task force Report : part 2 — assessing respondent understanding. Journal. Value Health. 2011;14(8):978–88. Available from: doi:10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​013
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis
Authors
Isabel B. Rodrigues
Jonathan D. Adachi
Karen A. Beattie
Joy C. MacDermid
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017 Go to the issue