Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions for the management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature

Authors: Hanin Kamaruzaman, Philip Kinghorn, Raymond Oppong

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the existing evidence on the cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions for the management of knee and hip osteoarthritis by systematically reviewing published economic evaluation studies.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted for the period 2004 to 2016. Electronic databases were searched to identify both trial and model based economic evaluation studies that evaluated surgical interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Results

A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria and an assessment of these studies showed that total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) showed evidence of cost-effectiveness and improvement in quality of life of the patients when compared to non-operative and non-surgical procedures. On the other hand, even though delaying TKA and THA may lead to some cost savings in the short-run, the results from the study showed that this was not a cost-effective option.

Conclusions

TKA and THA are cost-effective and should be recommended for the management of patients with end stage/severe knee and hip OA. However, there needs to be additional studies to assess the cost-effectiveness of other surgical interventions in order for definite conclusions to be reached.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wang TJ, et al. Effects of aquatic exercise on flexibility, strength and aerobic fitness in adults with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(2):141–52.CrossRefPubMed Wang TJ, et al. Effects of aquatic exercise on flexibility, strength and aerobic fitness in adults with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(2):141–52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Le TK, et al. Health care costs in US patients with and without a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. J Pain Res. 2012;5:23–30.PubMedPubMedCentral Le TK, et al. Health care costs in US patients with and without a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. J Pain Res. 2012;5:23–30.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Kotlarz H, et al. Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2009;60(12):3546–53.CrossRef Kotlarz H, et al. Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2009;60(12):3546–53.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hilismann, M., et al., Health economics in the field of osteoarthritis: an expert's consensus paper from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2013: p. 303-313. Hilismann, M., et al., Health economics in the field of osteoarthritis: an expert's consensus paper from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2013: p. 303-313.
10.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2606–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurtz SM, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2606–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Piscitelli P, et al. Socioeconomic burden of total joint arthroplasty for symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis in the Italian population: a 5-year analysis based on hospitalization records. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:1320–7.CrossRef Piscitelli P, et al. Socioeconomic burden of total joint arthroplasty for symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis in the Italian population: a 5-year analysis based on hospitalization records. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:1320–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pinto D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of nonpharmacologic, nonsurgical interventions for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: systematic review. Value Health. 2012;15(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed Pinto D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of nonpharmacologic, nonsurgical interventions for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: systematic review. Value Health. 2012;15(1):1–12.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wielage RC, et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of osteoarthritis oral therapies: a systematic review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(6):593–618.CrossRefPubMed Wielage RC, et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of osteoarthritis oral therapies: a systematic review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(6):593–618.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Xie F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical management for osteoarthritis pain. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(5):277–84.CrossRefPubMed Xie F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical management for osteoarthritis pain. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(5):277–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Husereau D, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(2):231–50.CrossRefPubMed Husereau D, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(2):231–50.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Philips Z, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assessment. 2004;8:36.CrossRef Philips Z, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assessment. 2004;8:36.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ofman JJ, et al. Examining the value and quality of health economic analyses: implications of utilizing the QHES. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9(1):53–61.PubMed Ofman JJ, et al. Examining the value and quality of health economic analyses: implications of utilizing the QHES. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9(1):53–61.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bedair H, Cha TD, Hansen VJ. Economic benefit to society at large of total knee arthroplasty in younger patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):119–26.CrossRefPubMed Bedair H, Cha TD, Hansen VJ. Economic benefit to society at large of total knee arthroplasty in younger patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(2):119–26.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Marsh JD, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery compared with non-operative management for osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ open. 2016;6(1):e009949.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marsh JD, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery compared with non-operative management for osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ open. 2016;6(1):e009949.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Mather RC, et al. Economic evaluation of access to musculoskeletal care: the case of waiting for total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):1.CrossRef Mather RC, et al. Economic evaluation of access to musculoskeletal care: the case of waiting for total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(1):1.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Koskinen E, et al. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthopaedica. 2008;79(4):499–507.CrossRefPubMed Koskinen E, et al. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthopaedica. 2008;79(4):499–507.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Li CS, et al. Cost-effectiveness and economic impact of the KineSpring® Knee Implant System in the treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2629–37.CrossRefPubMed Li CS, et al. Cost-effectiveness and economic impact of the KineSpring® Knee Implant System in the treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2629–37.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Pennington M, Grieve R, van der Meulen JH. Lifetime cost effectiveness of different brands of prosthesis used for total hip arthroplasty a study using the NJR dataset. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(6):762–70.CrossRefPubMed Pennington M, Grieve R, van der Meulen JH. Lifetime cost effectiveness of different brands of prosthesis used for total hip arthroplasty a study using the NJR dataset. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(6):762–70.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Stan G, Orban H, Orban C. Cost effectiveness analysis of knee osteoarthritis treatment. Chirurgia. 2015;110:368–74.PubMed Stan G, Orban H, Orban C. Cost effectiveness analysis of knee osteoarthritis treatment. Chirurgia. 2015;110:368–74.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Soohoo NF, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(9):1975–82.PubMed Soohoo NF, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(9):1975–82.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Xie F, et al. Total or partial knee replacement? Cost-utility analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis based on a 2-year observational study. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(1):27–34.CrossRefPubMed Xie F, et al. Total or partial knee replacement? Cost-utility analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis based on a 2-year observational study. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(1):27–34.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Räsänen P, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(1):108–15.CrossRefPubMed Räsänen P, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(1):108–15.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bozic KJ, et al. Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(9):2301–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bozic KJ, et al. Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(9):2301–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Bellamy N, et al. Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3. 0 Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(12):2413–5.PubMed Bellamy N, et al. Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3. 0 Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(12):2413–5.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Ruiz D, et al. The direct and indirect costs to society of treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(16):1473–80.CrossRefPubMed Ruiz D, et al. The direct and indirect costs to society of treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(16):1473–80.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Waimann CA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of total knee replacement: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(4):592–9.CrossRef Waimann CA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of total knee replacement: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(4):592–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Konopka JF, et al. The cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in younger patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(10):807–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Konopka JF, et al. The cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in younger patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(10):807–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Peersman G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of unicondylar versus total knee arthroplasty: a Markov model analysis. Knee. 2014;21:S37–42.CrossRefPubMed Peersman G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of unicondylar versus total knee arthroplasty: a Markov model analysis. Knee. 2014;21:S37–42.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Higashi H, Barendregt JJ. Cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacements for the Australian population with osteoarthritis: discrete-event simulation model. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higashi H, Barendregt JJ. Cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacements for the Australian population with osteoarthritis: discrete-event simulation model. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Losina E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Losina E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Heintzbergen S, et al. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis. Value Health. 2013;16(6):942–52.CrossRefPubMed Heintzbergen S, et al. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis. Value Health. 2013;16(6):942–52.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Mota R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early versus late total hip replacement in Italy. Value Health. 2013;16(2):267–79.CrossRefPubMed Mota R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early versus late total hip replacement in Italy. Value Health. 2013;16(2):267–79.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Di Tanna GL, et al. Modeling the cost-effectiveness for cement-less and hybrid prosthesis in total hip replacement in Emilia Romagna, Italy. J Surg Res. 2011;169(2):227–33.CrossRefPubMed Di Tanna GL, et al. Modeling the cost-effectiveness for cement-less and hybrid prosthesis in total hip replacement in Emilia Romagna, Italy. J Surg Res. 2011;169(2):227–33.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Pulikottil-Jacob R, et al. Cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis comparison of devices with differing bearing surfaces and modes of fixation. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(4):449–57.CrossRefPubMed Pulikottil-Jacob R, et al. Cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis comparison of devices with differing bearing surfaces and modes of fixation. Bone Joint J. 2015;97(4):449–57.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Pennington M, et al., Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ, 2013. 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f1026 Pennington M, et al., Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ, 2013. 346 doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​f1026
42.
go back to reference Griffin S, Claxton K. Analyzing uncertainty in cost-effectiveness for decision-making. In: Glied S, Smith PC, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Health Economics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 759–87. Griffin S, Claxton K. Analyzing uncertainty in cost-effectiveness for decision-making. In: Glied S, Smith PC, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Health Economics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 759–87.
43.
go back to reference Soohoo N, Kominski G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(11):2446–55.CrossRefPubMed Soohoo N, Kominski G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(11):2446–55.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making a practical guide. Med Decis Mak. 1993;13(4):322–38.CrossRef Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making a practical guide. Med Decis Mak. 1993;13(4):322–38.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Barton P, Bryan S, Robinson S. Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9(2):110–8.CrossRefPubMed Barton P, Bryan S, Robinson S. Modelling in the economic evaluation of health care: selecting the appropriate approach. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004;9(2):110–8.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Caro J. Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation. PharmacoEconomics. 2005;23(4):323–32.CrossRefPubMed Caro J. Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation. PharmacoEconomics. 2005;23(4):323–32.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Hughes D, et al. Conducting economic evaluations alongside randomised trials: current methodological issues and novel approaches. PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34(5):447–61.CrossRefPubMed Hughes D, et al. Conducting economic evaluations alongside randomised trials: current methodological issues and novel approaches. PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34(5):447–61.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Koopmanschap MA, Touw KC, Rutten FF. Analysis of costs and cost-effectiveness in multinational trials. Health Policy. 2001;58(2):175–86.CrossRefPubMed Koopmanschap MA, Touw KC, Rutten FF. Analysis of costs and cost-effectiveness in multinational trials. Health Policy. 2001;58(2):175–86.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Barbieri M, et al. What do international pharmacoeconomic guidelines say about economic data transferability? Value Health. 2010;13(8):1028–37.CrossRefPubMed Barbieri M, et al. What do international pharmacoeconomic guidelines say about economic data transferability? Value Health. 2010;13(8):1028–37.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Oppong R, Jowett S, Roberts TE. Economic evaluation alongside multinational studies: a systematic review of empirical studies. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0131949.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oppong R, Jowett S, Roberts TE. Economic evaluation alongside multinational studies: a systematic review of empirical studies. PloS One. 2015;10(6):e0131949.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
go back to reference Hiligsmann M, et al. A reference case for economic evaluations in osteoarthritis: An expert consensus article from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44:271–82.CrossRefPubMed Hiligsmann M, et al. A reference case for economic evaluations in osteoarthritis: An expert consensus article from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44:271–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions for the management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature
Authors
Hanin Kamaruzaman
Philip Kinghorn
Raymond Oppong
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1540-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017 Go to the issue