Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Implementing the Keele stratified care model for patients with low back pain: an observational impact study

Authors: Adrian Bamford, Andy Nation, Susie Durrell, Lazaros Andronis, Ellen Rule, Hugh McLeod

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Keele stratified care model for management of low back pain comprises use of the prognostic STarT Back Screening Tool to allocate patients into one of three risk-defined categories leading to associated risk-specific treatment pathways, such that high-risk patients receive enhanced treatment and more sessions than medium- and low-risk patients. The Keele model is associated with economic benefits and is being widely implemented. The objective was to assess the use of the stratified model following its introduction in an acute hospital physiotherapy department setting in Gloucestershire, England.

Methods

Physiotherapists recorded data on 201 patients treated using the Keele model in two audits in 2013 and 2014. To assess whether implementation of the stratified model was associated with the anticipated range of treatment sessions, regression analysis of the audit data was used to determine whether high- or medium-risk patients received significantly more treatment sessions than low-risk patients. The analysis controlled for patient characteristics, year, physiotherapists’ seniority and physiotherapist. To assess the physiotherapists’ views on the usefulness of the stratified model, audit data on this were analysed using framework methods. To assess the potential economic consequences of introducing the stratified care model in Gloucestershire, published economic evaluation findings on back-related National Health Service (NHS) costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and societal productivity losses were applied to audit data on the proportion of patients by risk classification and estimates of local incidence.

Results

When the Keele model was implemented, patients received significantly more treatment sessions as the risk-rating increased, in line with the anticipated impact of targeted treatment pathways. Physiotherapists were largely positive about using the model. The potential annual impact of rolling out the model across Gloucestershire is a gain in approximately 30 QALYs, a reduction in productivity losses valued at £1.4 million and almost no change to NHS costs.

Conclusions

The Keele model was implemented and risk-specific treatment pathways successfully used for patients presenting with low back pain. Applying published economic evidence to the Gloucestershire locality suggests that substantial health and productivity outcomes would be associated with rollout of the Keele model while being cost-neutral for the NHS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of low back pain in the United Kingdom. Pain. 2000;84(1):95–103.CrossRefPubMed Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of low back pain in the United Kingdom. Pain. 2000;84(1):95–103.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Newton JN, Briggs AD, Murray CJ, Dicker D, Foreman K, Wang H, et al. Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:2257–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Newton JN, Briggs AD, Murray CJ, Dicker D, Foreman K, Wang H, et al. Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:2257–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Jordan K, Kadam U, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Consultant prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Di. 2010;11:144–51.CrossRef Jordan K, Kadam U, Hayward R, Porcheret M, Young C, Croft P. Consultant prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Di. 2010;11:144–51.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Savigny P, Kuntze S, Watson P, Underwood M, Ritchie G, Cotterell M, et al. Low Back Pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners; 2009. Savigny P, Kuntze S, Watson P, Underwood M, Ritchie G, Cotterell M, et al. Low Back Pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners; 2009.
5.
go back to reference Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Absence Management 2015 Annual Survey Report. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development; 2015. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Absence Management 2015 Annual Survey Report. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development; 2015.
6.
go back to reference Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):492–504.CrossRefPubMed Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):492–504.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135(1–2):187–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135(1–2):187–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Royal College of General Practitioners. In: Guidance NIfHaCE, editor. Low Back Pain: Early Management of Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain. London: Royal College of General Practitioners (UK); 2009. Royal College of General Practitioners. In: Guidance NIfHaCE, editor. Low Back Pain: Early Management of Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain. London: Royal College of General Practitioners (UK); 2009.
9.
go back to reference Costa LCM, Koes BW, Pransky G, Borkan J, Maher CG, Smeets RJEM. Primary care research priorities in low back pain: an update. Spine. 2013;38(2):148–56.CrossRef Costa LCM, Koes BW, Pransky G, Borkan J, Maher CG, Smeets RJEM. Primary care research priorities in low back pain: an update. Spine. 2013;38(2):148–56.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Whitehurst DGT, Bryan S, Lewis M, Hill J, Hay E. Exploring the cost-utility of stratified primary care management of low back pain compared with current best practice within risk-defined subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;10:1136. Whitehurst DGT, Bryan S, Lewis M, Hill J, Hay E. Exploring the cost-utility of stratified primary care management of low back pain compared with current best practice within risk-defined subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;10:1136.
12.
go back to reference Foster N, Mullis R, Hill J, Lewis M, Whitehurst D, Doyle C, et al. Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (impact back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):102–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foster N, Mullis R, Hill J, Lewis M, Whitehurst D, Doyle C, et al. Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (impact back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):102–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Whitehurst DGT, Bryan S, Lewis M, Hay E, Mullis R, Foster N. Implementing stratified primary care management for low back pain: cost-utility analysis alongside a prospective population-based. sequential comparison study. Spine. 2015;40(6):405–14.CrossRefPubMed Whitehurst DGT, Bryan S, Lewis M, Hay E, Mullis R, Foster N. Implementing stratified primary care management for low back pain: cost-utility analysis alongside a prospective population-based. sequential comparison study. Spine. 2015;40(6):405–14.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Johnson RE, Jones GT, Wiles NJ, Chaddock C, Potter RG, Roberts C, et al. Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(15):1578–85.CrossRefPubMed Johnson RE, Jones GT, Wiles NJ, Chaddock C, Potter RG, Roberts C, et al. Active exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy for persistent disabling low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(15):1578–85.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Yao GL, Bryan S, Raftery JP, Mullis R, et al. A brief pain management program compared with physical therapy for low back pain: results from an economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(3):466–73.CrossRefPubMed Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Yao GL, Bryan S, Raftery JP, Mullis R, et al. A brief pain management program compared with physical therapy for low back pain: results from an economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(3):466–73.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Critchley DJ, Ratcliffe J, Noonan S, Jones RH, Hurley MV. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: a pragmatic randomized trial with economic evaluation. Spine. 2007;32(14):1474–81.CrossRefPubMed Critchley DJ, Ratcliffe J, Noonan S, Jones RH, Hurley MV. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: a pragmatic randomized trial with economic evaluation. Spine. 2007;32(14):1474–81.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rogerson MD, Gatchel RJ, Bierner SM. A cost utility analysis of interdisciplinary early intervention versus treatment as usual for high-risk acute low back pain patients. Pain Pract. 2010;10(5):382–95.CrossRefPubMed Rogerson MD, Gatchel RJ, Bierner SM. A cost utility analysis of interdisciplinary early intervention versus treatment as usual for high-risk acute low back pain patients. Pain Pract. 2010;10(5):382–95.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Skouen JS, Grasdal AL, Haldorsen EM, Ursin H. Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study. Spine. 2002;27(9):901–9.CrossRefPubMed Skouen JS, Grasdal AL, Haldorsen EM, Ursin H. Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study. Spine. 2002;27(9):901–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lamb SE, Hansen Z, Lall R, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):916–23.CrossRefPubMed Lamb SE, Hansen Z, Lall R, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):916–23.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Norton G, McDonough CM, Cabral H, Shwartz M, Burgess JF. Cost-utility of cognitive behavioral therapy for low back pain from the commercial payer perspective. Spine. 2015;40(10):725–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Norton G, McDonough CM, Cabral H, Shwartz M, Burgess JF. Cost-utility of cognitive behavioral therapy for low back pain from the commercial payer perspective. Spine. 2015;40(10):725–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Schweikert B, Jacobi E, Seitz R, Cziske R, Ehlert A, Knab J, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding a cognitive behavioral treatment to the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(12):2519–26.PubMed Schweikert B, Jacobi E, Seitz R, Cziske R, Ehlert A, Knab J, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding a cognitive behavioral treatment to the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(12):2519–26.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main C, Foster N, Hay E. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:632–41.CrossRefPubMed Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main C, Foster N, Hay E. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:632–41.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hay EM, Dunn KM, Hill JC, Lewis M, Mason E, Konstantinou K, et al. A randomised clinical trial of subgrouping and targeted treatment for low back pain compared with best current care. The STarT Back Trial Study Protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Dis. 2008;9:58. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-58.CrossRef Hay EM, Dunn KM, Hill JC, Lewis M, Mason E, Konstantinou K, et al. A randomised clinical trial of subgrouping and targeted treatment for low back pain compared with best current care. The STarT Back Trial Study Protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Dis. 2008;9:58. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-9-58.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wooldridge J. Introductory Econometrics. A modern approach. 4th ed. Mason: South Western College; 2009. Wooldridge J. Introductory Econometrics. A modern approach. 4th ed. Mason: South Western College; 2009.
27.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
28.
go back to reference Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
29.
go back to reference Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, Rice N, Spackman E, Hinde S, et al. Methods for the estimation of the NICE cost effectiveness threshold. York: CHE Research Paper 81; 2013. Claxton K, Martin S, Soares M, Rice N, Spackman E, Hinde S, et al. Methods for the estimation of the NICE cost effectiveness threshold. York: CHE Research Paper 81; 2013.
30.
go back to reference Dunn K. Epidemiology of low back pain in primary care: a cohort study of consulters PhD thesis. Staffordshire: Keele University; 2004. Dunn K. Epidemiology of low back pain in primary care: a cohort study of consulters PhD thesis. Staffordshire: Keele University; 2004.
32.
go back to reference Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2014. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2015. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2014. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2015.
34.
go back to reference Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999;18:341–64.CrossRefPubMed Claxton K. The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies. J Health Econ. 1999;18:341–64.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Lamb S, Lall R, Hansen Z, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The back skills training (BeST) trial. Health Technol Asses. 2010;14(41):iii–253. Lamb S, Lall R, Hansen Z, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The back skills training (BeST) trial. Health Technol Asses. 2010;14(41):iii–253.
36.
go back to reference Lamb S, Mistry D, Lall R, Hansen Z, Evans D, Withers E, et al. Group cognitive behavioural interventions for low back pain in primary care: extended follow-up of the Back Skills Training Trial (ISRCTN54717854). Pain. 2012;153(2):494–501.CrossRefPubMed Lamb S, Mistry D, Lall R, Hansen Z, Evans D, Withers E, et al. Group cognitive behavioural interventions for low back pain in primary care: extended follow-up of the Back Skills Training Trial (ISRCTN54717854). Pain. 2012;153(2):494–501.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference National Clinical Guideline Centre. Low back pain and sciatica: management of non-specific low back pain and sciatica. Draft for consultation. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre; 2016. National Clinical Guideline Centre. Low back pain and sciatica: management of non-specific low back pain and sciatica. Draft for consultation. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre; 2016.
Metadata
Title
Implementing the Keele stratified care model for patients with low back pain: an observational impact study
Authors
Adrian Bamford
Andy Nation
Susie Durrell
Lazaros Andronis
Ellen Rule
Hugh McLeod
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1412-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2017 Go to the issue