Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2,011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish Fracture Register

Authors: Carl Bergdahl, Carl Ekholm, David Wennergren, Filip Nilsson, Michael Möller

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Humeral fractures are common, but the association between the patho-anatomical fracture pattern and patient characteristics has been inadequately studied and epidemiological knowledge is scarce. Following the introduction of the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR), risk factors for various fractures can be studied, as well as the outcome of different treatments. The objective of this study was to analyse adult humeral fractures in Gothenburg from a descriptive epidemiological perspective.

Methods

All humeral fractures registered in the SFR at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in 2011–2013 in patients aged ≥ 16 years were included. The fractures were divided into humeral segments (proximal, shaft and distal humerus) and analysed according to patient characteristics and patho-anatomical pattern. Furthermore, overall and age-specific incidence rates were calculated.

Results

A total of 2,011 humeral fractures were registered in the SFR, of which 79 % were proximal, 13 % shaft and 8 % distal humeral fractures. The mean age was 66.8 years and women ran a higher risk of humeral fractures than men (female/male ratio 2.4:1). On average, women were older than men at the time of fracture (mean age 70.1 years for women vs. 58.9 years for men). The overall incidence of humeral fractures was 104.7 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, with a segment-specific incidence of 83.0 for proximal fractures, 13.4 for shaft fractures and 8.3 per 100,000 person-years for distal fractures. There was a distinct increase in the age-specific incidence from the fifth decade and onwards, regardless of fracture site. Most fractures occurred in older patients (83 % > 50 years) as a result of a simple or an unspecified fall (79 % > 50 years). Only 1.2 % of all fractures were open injuries and 1.3 % were pathological.

Conclusion

This population-based study provides updated epidemiological data on humeral fractures in a Western-European setting. Most humeral fractures occur as the result of low-energy falls in the elderly population, indicating the influence of age-related risk factors in these fractures. The SFR will be a useful tool for providing continuous information on fracture epidemiology, risk factors and treatment outcome and these population-based data are essential in the planning of future fracture prevention and management.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Murray IR, Amin AK, White TO, Robinson CM. Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2011;93(1):1–11.CrossRef Murray IR, Amin AK, White TO, Robinson CM. Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2011;93(1):1–11.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(1):38–47.CrossRefPubMed Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(1):38–47.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Horak J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;112:250–3.CrossRef Horak J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;112:250–3.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dimai HP, Svedbom A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Pieber T, Resch H, Zwettler E, Thaler H, Szivak M, Amrein K, Borgstrom F. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures in Austria between 1989 and 2008. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(9):2413–21.CrossRefPubMed Dimai HP, Svedbom A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Pieber T, Resch H, Zwettler E, Thaler H, Szivak M, Amrein K, Borgstrom F. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures in Austria between 1989 and 2008. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(9):2413–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J, Erin-Madsen J, Grum B, Horsnaes MW, Aalberg JR. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58(1):75–7.CrossRefPubMed Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J, Erin-Madsen J, Grum B, Horsnaes MW, Aalberg JR. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58(1):75–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80(2):249–53.CrossRef Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80(2):249–53.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(4):365–71.CrossRefPubMed Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(4):365–71.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88(11):1469–73.CrossRef Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88(11):1469–73.CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzer J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1990.CrossRef Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzer J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1990.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sweden S. Befolkningsstatistik. In: Statistiska centralbyrån. 2015. Sweden S. Befolkningsstatistik. In: Statistiska centralbyrån. 2015.
13.
go back to reference Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J. Secular trends in distal humeral fractures of elderly women: nationwide statistics in Finland between 1970 and 2007. Bone. 2010;46(5):1355–8.CrossRefPubMed Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J. Secular trends in distal humeral fractures of elderly women: nationwide statistics in Finland between 1970 and 2007. Bone. 2010;46(5):1355–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Sievanen H, Parkkari J. Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007. Bone. 2009;44(4):656–9.CrossRefPubMed Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Sievanen H, Parkkari J. Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007. Bone. 2009;44(4):656–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jung SW, Shim SB, Kim HM, Lee JH, Lim HS. Factors that influence reduction loss in proximal humerus fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(6):276–82.CrossRefPubMed Jung SW, Shim SB, Kim HM, Lee JH, Lim HS. Factors that influence reduction loss in proximal humerus fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(6):276–82.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bahrs C, Stojicevic T, Blumenstock G, Brorson S, Badke A, Stockle U, Rolauffs B, Freude T. Trends in epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of proximal humeral fractures. Int Orthop. 2014;38(8):1697–704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bahrs C, Stojicevic T, Blumenstock G, Brorson S, Badke A, Stockle U, Rolauffs B, Freude T. Trends in epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of proximal humeral fractures. Int Orthop. 2014;38(8):1697–704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Jakob F, Seefried L, Schwab M. Age and osteoporosis. Effects of aging on osteoporosis, the diagnostics and therapy. Internist (Berl). 2014;55(7):755–61.CrossRef Jakob F, Seefried L, Schwab M. Age and osteoporosis. Effects of aging on osteoporosis, the diagnostics and therapy. Internist (Berl). 2014;55(7):755–61.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Singh A, Adams AL, Burchette R, Dell RM, Funahashi TT, Navarro RA. The effect of osteoporosis management on proximal humeral fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(2):191–8.CrossRefPubMed Singh A, Adams AL, Burchette R, Dell RM, Funahashi TT, Navarro RA. The effect of osteoporosis management on proximal humeral fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(2):191–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wainwright AM, Williams JR, Carr AJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000;82(5):636–42.CrossRef Wainwright AM, Williams JR, Carr AJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000;82(5):636–42.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sundfeldt M, Karlsson J, Bhandari M, Moller M. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Injury. 2015. Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sundfeldt M, Karlsson J, Bhandari M, Moller M. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Injury. 2015.
Metadata
Title
Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2,011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish Fracture Register
Authors
Carl Bergdahl
Carl Ekholm
David Wennergren
Filip Nilsson
Michael Möller
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1009-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2016 Go to the issue