Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Database

The Swedish fracture register: 103,000 fractures registered

Authors: David Wennergren, Carl Ekholm, Anna Sandelin, Michael Möller

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although fractures consume large social and financial resources, little is known about their actual numbers, treatment methods or outcomes. The scarcity of data calls for a high-quality, population-based register. No previous registers have prospectively collected data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on fractures of all types. The Swedish Fracture Register was recently created to fill this gap in knowledge. Its purpose is to provide information on fractures of all types, whether treated by surgery or otherwise. The aim of this article is to describe how the register was developed and its current use.

Description

The Swedish Fracture Register was developed during a 4-year period, 2007–2010. Data collection started in 2011. The register currently collects data on all extremity, pelvic and spine fractures in adults who have been diagnosed or treated at the affiliated departments. Data entry is fully web based, including date, cause of injury, classification and treatment. It is performed by the attending physician. Patients fill out PROMs – EQ-5D-3L and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) – relating to health status and level of functioning before the fracture and one year later. Surgeon-reported outcome measures are registered as reoperation rates. The Swedish Fracture Register is now functioning effectively and is used in clinical routine. From January 2011 to September 2015, more than 103,000 fractures have been entered at 26 Swedish orthopedic departments.

Conclusions

The Swedish Fracture Register is already a well-functioning, population-based fracture register that covers fractures of all types, regardless of treatment, and collects both surgeon- and patient-reported outcome measures. In the future the Swedish Fracture Register will be able to present both results of fracture treatment and valuable epidemiological data.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:111–21.CrossRefPubMed Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:111–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Boyer P, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:858–63.CrossRefPubMed Boyer P, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:858–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sung J, Siegel J, Tornetta P, Bhandari M. The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sung J, Siegel J, Tornetta P, Bhandari M. The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Johanson PE, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Overgaard S, et al. Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:535–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johanson PE, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Overgaard S, et al. Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:535–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:867–75.CrossRefPubMed Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:867–75.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gjertsen JE, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Steindal K, Vinje T, et al. The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:583–93.CrossRefPubMed Gjertsen JE, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Steindal K, Vinje T, et al. The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:583–93.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Meling T, Harboe K, Arthursson AJ, Søreide K. Steppingstones to the implementation of an inhospital fracture and dislocation registry using the AO/OTA classification: compliance, completeness and commitment. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meling T, Harboe K, Arthursson AJ, Søreide K. Steppingstones to the implementation of an inhospital fracture and dislocation registry using the AO/OTA classification: compliance, completeness and commitment. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Gromov K, Fristed JV, Brix M, Troelsen A. Completeness and data validity for the Danish Fracture Database. Dan Med J. 2013;60:A4712.PubMed Gromov K, Fristed JV, Brix M, Troelsen A. Completeness and data validity for the Danish Fracture Database. Dan Med J. 2013;60:A4712.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang Y. Clinical epidemiology of orthopedic trauma. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2012.CrossRef Zhang Y. Clinical epidemiology of orthopedic trauma. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2012.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L. Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:308–15.CrossRefPubMed Granan LP, Bahr R, Steindal K, Furnes O, Engebretsen L. Development of a national cruciate ligament surgery registry: the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:308–15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ahlden M, Samuelsson K, Sernert N, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Kartus J. The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2230–5.CrossRefPubMed Ahlden M, Samuelsson K, Sernert N, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Kartus J. The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2230–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Müller M, Koch P, Nazarian S, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1990.CrossRef Müller M, Koch P, Nazarian S, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1990.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21 Suppl 10:S1–133.CrossRefPubMed Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J, Broderick JS, Creevey W, DeCoster TA, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21 Suppl 10:S1–133.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rüedi TP, Murphy WM. AO principles of fracture management. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2000. Rüedi TP, Murphy WM. AO principles of fracture management. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2000.
17.
go back to reference Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1993.CrossRef Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1993.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Garden RS. Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:647–63. Garden RS. Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:647–63.
19.
go back to reference Neer 2nd CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077–89.PubMed Neer 2nd CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077–89.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Euler E, Rüedi TP. Scapulafraktur. In: Habermeyer P, editor. Schulterchirurgie. München, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1996. p. 261–72. Euler E, Rüedi TP. Scapulafraktur. In: Habermeyer P, editor. Schulterchirurgie. München, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1996. p. 261–72.
21.
go back to reference Ideberg R, Grevsten S, Larsson S. Epidemiology of scapular fractures. Incidence and classification of 338 fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:395–7.CrossRefPubMed Ideberg R, Grevsten S, Larsson S. Epidemiology of scapular fractures. Incidence and classification of 338 fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:395–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:476–84.CrossRefPubMed Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:476–84.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1245–60.CrossRefPubMed Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1245–60.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ponzer S, Skoog A, Bergström G. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA): cross-cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish SMFA (SMFA-Swe). Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:756–63.CrossRefPubMed Ponzer S, Skoog A, Bergström G. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA): cross-cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish SMFA (SMFA-Swe). Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:756–63.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Swedish fracture register: 103,000 fractures registered
Authors
David Wennergren
Carl Ekholm
Anna Sandelin
Michael Möller
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0795-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015 Go to the issue