Published in:
Open Access 01-12-2015 | Erratum
Erratum to: A Bayesian network meta-analysis: Comparing the clinical effectiveness of local corticosteroid injections using different treatment strategies for carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2015
Login to get accessExcerpt
During production of the original article [1], an oversight occurred which resulted in the omission of the Figures files from the published item. The original article has now been updated to include Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, as they appear below.
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for literature search and identifications of articles for review
Fig. 2
Risk of bias (a) graph and (b) summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the standard pair-wise meta-analysis for clinical response of local corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome. Abbreviations: OR = odds ratio, CI= confidence interval, DI = distal approach corticosteroid injection, PI = proximal approach corticosteroid injection, Ulnar-I = ultrasound-guided in-plane approach
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the standard pair-wise meta-analysis for change in symptom severity scale of local corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome. Abbreviations: WMD = weighted mean difference, CI= confidence interval, PI = proximal approach corticosteroid injection, Ulnar-I = ultrasound-guided in-plane injection, Ulnar-O = ultrasound-guided out-plane injection
Fig. 5
Forest plot of the standard pair-wise meta-analysis for change in functional status scale of local corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome. Abbreviations: WMD = weighted mean difference, CI= confidence interval, PI = proximal approach corticosteroid injection, Ulnar-I = ultrasound-guided in-plane injection, Ulnar-O = ultrasound-guided out-plane injection
Fig. 6
Network plots of the treatments for (a) clinical response, (b) change in symptom severity scale (c) change in functional status scale
Fig. 7
Ranking of treatment strategies based on probability of their effects on (a) clinical response (b) change in symptom severity scale (c) change in functional status scale
Fig. 8
Comparison-adjusted funnel plots for (a) clinical response (b) change in symptom severity scale (c) change in functional status scale
× ![]()
× ![]()
× ![]()
× ![]()
× ![]()
× ![]()
× ![]()
× ![]()
…