Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pulmonary Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults

Authors: Eric V. Neufeld, Brett A. Dolezal, William Speier, Christopher B. Cooper

Published in: BMC Pulmonary Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Compared to other pulmonary function tests, there is a lack of standardization regarding how a maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) maneuver is performed. Specifically, little is known about the variation in breathing frequency (fR) and its potential impact on the accuracy of test results. This study examines the effect of several preselected values for fR and one self-selected fR (fRself) on MVV.

Methods

Ten participants performed MVV maneuvers at various fR values, ranging from 50 to 130 breaths·min− 1 in 10 breaths·min− 1 intervals and at one fRself. Three identical trials with 2-min rest periods were conducted at each fR, and the sequence in which fR was tested was randomized. Ventilation and related parameters were measured directly by gas exchange analysis via a metabolic measurement system.

Results

A third-order polynomial regression analysis showed that MVV = − 0.0001(fR)3 + 0.0258(fR)2–1.38(fR) + 96.9 at preselected fR and increased up to approximately 100 breaths·min− 1 (r2 = 0.982, P < 0.001). Paired t-tests indicated that average MVV values obtained at all preselected fR values, but not fRself, were significantly lower than the average maximum value across all participants. A linear regression analysis revealed that tidal volume (VT) = − 2.63(MVV) + 300.4 at preselected fR (r2 = 0.846, P < 0.001); however, this inverse relationship between VT and MVV did not remain true for the self-selected fR. The VT obtained at this fR (90.9 ± 19.1% of maximum) was significantly greater than the VT associated with the most similar MVV value (at a preselected fR of 100 breaths·min− 1, 62.0 ± 10.4% of maximum; 95% confidence interval of difference: (17.5, 40.4%), P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the shortcomings of the current lack of standardization in MVV testing and establishes data-driven recommendations for optimal fR. The true MVV was obtained with a self-selected fR (mean ± SD: 69.9 ± 22.3 breaths·min− 1) or within a preselected fR range of 110–120 breaths·min− 1. Until a comprehensive reference equation is established, it is advised that MVV be measured directly using these guidelines. If an individual is unable to perform or performs the maneuver poorly at a self-selected fR, ventilating within a mandated fR range of 110–120 breaths·min− 1 may also be acceptable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mottram C. Ruppel’s manual of pulmonary function testing. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017. p. 66-67. Mottram C. Ruppel’s manual of pulmonary function testing. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017. p. 66-67.
2.
3.
go back to reference Serisier DE, Mastaglia FL, Gibson GJ. Respiratory muscle function and ventilatory control. I in patients with motor neurone disease. II in patients with myotonic dystrophy. Q J Med. 1982;51:205–26.PubMed Serisier DE, Mastaglia FL, Gibson GJ. Respiratory muscle function and ventilatory control. I in patients with motor neurone disease. II in patients with myotonic dystrophy. Q J Med. 1982;51:205–26.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rochester DF, Esau SA. Assessment of ventilatory function in patients with neuromuscular disease. Clin Chest Med. 1994;15:751–63.PubMed Rochester DF, Esau SA. Assessment of ventilatory function in patients with neuromuscular disease. Clin Chest Med. 1994;15:751–63.PubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Ferrazza AM, Martolini D, Valli G, Palange P. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the functional and prognostic evaluation of patients with pulmonary diseases. Respiration. 2009;77:3–17.CrossRefPubMed Ferrazza AM, Martolini D, Valli G, Palange P. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the functional and prognostic evaluation of patients with pulmonary diseases. Respiration. 2009;77:3–17.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Toma N, Bicescu G, Enache R, Dragoi R, Cinteza M. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in differential diagnosis of dyspnea. Maedica (Buchar). 2010;5:214–8. Toma N, Bicescu G, Enache R, Dragoi R, Cinteza M. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in differential diagnosis of dyspnea. Maedica (Buchar). 2010;5:214–8.
9.
go back to reference Arena R, Sietsema KE. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical evaluation of patients with heart and lung disease. Circulation. 2011;123:668–80.CrossRefPubMed Arena R, Sietsema KE. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical evaluation of patients with heart and lung disease. Circulation. 2011;123:668–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Myers J. Applications of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the management of cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26(Suppl 1):S49–55.CrossRefPubMed Myers J. Applications of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the management of cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26(Suppl 1):S49–55.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Neder JA, Andreoni S, Lerario MC, Nery LE. Reference values for lung function tests. II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999;32:719–27.CrossRefPubMed Neder JA, Andreoni S, Lerario MC, Nery LE. Reference values for lung function tests. II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999;32:719–27.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fulton JE, Pivarnik JM, Taylor WC, Snider SA, Tate AL, Frankowski RF. Prediction of maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) in African-American adolescent girls. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995;20:225–33.CrossRefPubMed Fulton JE, Pivarnik JM, Taylor WC, Snider SA, Tate AL, Frankowski RF. Prediction of maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) in African-American adolescent girls. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995;20:225–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kor AC, Ong KC, Earnest A, Wang YT. Prediction of the maximal voluntary ventilation in healthy adult Chinese subjects. Respirology. 2004;9:76–80.CrossRefPubMed Kor AC, Ong KC, Earnest A, Wang YT. Prediction of the maximal voluntary ventilation in healthy adult Chinese subjects. Respirology. 2004;9:76–80.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bernstein L, D'Silva JL, Mendel D. The effect of the rate of breathing on the maximum breathing capacity determined with a new spirometer. Thorax. 1952;7:255–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bernstein L, D'Silva JL, Mendel D. The effect of the rate of breathing on the maximum breathing capacity determined with a new spirometer. Thorax. 1952;7:255–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Dillard TA, Hnatiuk OW, McCumber TR. Maximum voluntary ventilation. Spirometric determinants in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:870–5.CrossRefPubMed Dillard TA, Hnatiuk OW, McCumber TR. Maximum voluntary ventilation. Spirometric determinants in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:870–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Miller WF, Johnson RL Jr, Wu N. Relationships between maximal breathing capacity and timed expiratory capacities. J Appl Physiol. 1959;14:510–6.CrossRef Miller WF, Johnson RL Jr, Wu N. Relationships between maximal breathing capacity and timed expiratory capacities. J Appl Physiol. 1959;14:510–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–38.CrossRefPubMed Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–38.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Campbell SCA. Comparison of the maximum voluntary ventilation with the forced expiratory volume in one second: an assessment of subject cooperation. J Occup Med. 1982;24:531–3.PubMed Campbell SCA. Comparison of the maximum voluntary ventilation with the forced expiratory volume in one second: an assessment of subject cooperation. J Occup Med. 1982;24:531–3.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116–28.CrossRefPubMed Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116–28.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Johnson BD, Weisman IM, Zeballos RJ, Beck KC. Emerging concepts in the evaluation of ventilatory limitation during exercise: the exercise tidal flow-volume loop. Chest. 1999;116:488–503.CrossRefPubMed Johnson BD, Weisman IM, Zeballos RJ, Beck KC. Emerging concepts in the evaluation of ventilatory limitation during exercise: the exercise tidal flow-volume loop. Chest. 1999;116:488–503.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Clark TJ, Freedman S, Campbell EJ, Winn RR. The ventilatory capacity of patients with chronic airways obstruction. Clin Sci. 1969;36:307–16.PubMed Clark TJ, Freedman S, Campbell EJ, Winn RR. The ventilatory capacity of patients with chronic airways obstruction. Clin Sci. 1969;36:307–16.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Burrows B, Strauss RH, Niden AH. Chronic obstructive lung disease 1, 2: III. Interrelationships of pulmonary function data. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1965;91:861–8.PubMed Burrows B, Strauss RH, Niden AH. Chronic obstructive lung disease 1, 2: III. Interrelationships of pulmonary function data. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1965;91:861–8.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Jones NL, Jones G, Edwards RH. Exercise tolerance in chronic airway obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971;103:477–91.PubMed Jones NL, Jones G, Edwards RH. Exercise tolerance in chronic airway obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971;103:477–91.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Cherniack RM, Raber MB. Normal standards for ventilatory function using an automated wedge spirometer. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972;106:38–46.CrossRefPubMed Cherniack RM, Raber MB. Normal standards for ventilatory function using an automated wedge spirometer. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972;106:38–46.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bass H. The flow volume loop: normal standards and abnormalities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1973;63:171–6.CrossRefPubMed Bass H. The flow volume loop: normal standards and abnormalities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1973;63:171–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hasan S, Rakkah NIAV, Attaur-Rasool S. Effect of smoking on respiratory pressures and lung volumes in young adults. Biomedica. 2013;29:96–100. Hasan S, Rakkah NIAV, Attaur-Rasool S. Effect of smoking on respiratory pressures and lung volumes in young adults. Biomedica. 2013;29:96–100.
28.
go back to reference Stein R, Selvadurai H, Coates A, Wilkes DL, Schneiderman-Walker J, Corey M. Determination of maximal voluntary ventilation in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;35:467–71.CrossRefPubMed Stein R, Selvadurai H, Coates A, Wilkes DL, Schneiderman-Walker J, Corey M. Determination of maximal voluntary ventilation in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;35:467–71.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tell A, Bagali S, Aithala M, Khodnapur J, Dhanakshirur GB. Alterations in minute ventilation, maximum voluntary ventilation and dyspneic index in different trimesters of pregnancy. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;58:96–9.PubMed Tell A, Bagali S, Aithala M, Khodnapur J, Dhanakshirur GB. Alterations in minute ventilation, maximum voluntary ventilation and dyspneic index in different trimesters of pregnancy. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;58:96–9.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Ortega VE, Kumar R. The effect of ancestry and genetic variation on lung function predictions: What is “normal” lung function in diverse human populations? Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:16.CrossRefPubMed Ortega VE, Kumar R. The effect of ancestry and genetic variation on lung function predictions: What is “normal” lung function in diverse human populations? Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:16.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Duong M, Islam S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, O’Byrne PM, Schunemann HJ, Igumbor E, Chifamba J, Liu L, Li W, et al. Global differences in lung function by region (PURE): an international, community-based prospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:599–609.CrossRefPubMed Duong M, Islam S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, O’Byrne PM, Schunemann HJ, Igumbor E, Chifamba J, Liu L, Li W, et al. Global differences in lung function by region (PURE): an international, community-based prospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1:599–609.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Roa Jr CC, Zaldivar CA, Salonga R, Bobadilla J, Lansang MA, Reodica R, Balgos A, Blanco J, TJ Q. Normal standards for ventilatory function test in adult Filipinos. Philipp J Intern Med. 2013;51:1–6. Roa Jr CC, Zaldivar CA, Salonga R, Bobadilla J, Lansang MA, Reodica R, Balgos A, Blanco J, TJ Q. Normal standards for ventilatory function test in adult Filipinos. Philipp J Intern Med. 2013;51:1–6.
33.
go back to reference Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–68.CrossRefPubMed Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:948–68.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults
Authors
Eric V. Neufeld
Brett A. Dolezal
William Speier
Christopher B. Cooper
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2466
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0650-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Pulmonary Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue