Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Polio Virus | Research article

Effectiveness of a community-level social mobilization intervention in achieving the outcomes of polio vaccination campaigns during the post-polio-endemic period: Evidence from CORE Group polio project in Uttar Pradesh, India

Authors: Manojkumar Choudhary, Roma Solomon, Jitendra Awale, Rina Dey, Jagajeet Prasad Singh, William Weiss

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A social mobilization (SM) initiative contributed to India’s success in polio elimination. This was the CORE Group Polio Project (CGPP) India, a partner of the Uttar Pradesh (UP) SM Network and which continued its SM activities, even during the polio-free period through a network of multi-level social mobilizers. This paper assesses the effects of this community-level SM (CLSM) intervention on the extent of community engagement and performance of polio Supplementary Immunization Activity campaigns (SIAs) during the post-polio-endemic period (i.e., from March 2012 to September 2017).

Methods

This study followed a quasi-experimental design. We used secondary, cluster-level data from CGPP India’s Management Information System, including 52 SIAs held from January 2008 to September 2017, covering 56 blocks from 12 districts of UP. We computed various indicators and performed Generalized Estimating Equations based analysis to assess the statistical significance of differences between the outcomes of intervention and non-intervention areas. We then estimated the effects of the SM intervention using Interrupted time-series, Difference-in-Differences and Synthetic Control Methods. Finally, we estimated the population influenced by the intervention.

Results

The performance of polio SIAs changed over time, with the intervention areas having better outcomes than non-intervention areas. The absence of CLSM intervention during the post-polio-endemic period would have negatively impacted the outcomes of polio SIAs. The percentage of children vaccinated at polio SIA booths, percentage of ‘X’ houses (i.e., households with unvaccinated children or households with out-of-home/out-of-village children or locked households) converted to ‘P’ (i.e., households with all vaccinated children or households without children eligible for vaccination), and percentage of resistant houses converted to polio acceptors would have gone down by 14.1 (Range: 12.7 to 15.5), 6.3 (Range: 5.2 to 7.3) and 7.4 percentage points, respectively. Community engagement would have reduced by 7.2 (Range: 6.6 to 7.7) percentage points.

Conclusions

The absence of CLSM intervention would have significantly decreased the level of community engagement and negatively impacted the performance of polio SIAs of the post-polio-endemic period. The study provides evidence of an added value of deploying additional human resource dedicated to social mobilization to achieve desired vaccination outcomes in hard-to-reach or programmatically challenging areas.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Polio planning units – are the smaller cluster of urban areas (urban wards) from administrative block or a city [9].
 
2
HRAs were designated on the basis of multiple indicators not just refusals and hard to reach areas
 
3
In polio SIAs, fixed site or booth-based vaccination refers to a process of dispensing oral polio vaccine to eligible children at kiosks (booths) set up at fixed sites in a community. These booths are temporary and located at different places such as health facilities, educational institutions, residential premises and transit places like railway stations, bus stops.
 
4
Donor pool – refers to a set of potential control areas [25] . In this study, donor pool included the villages/urban wards without community-level SM Net intervention (also known as non-CMC areas) from a block/polio-planning unit.
 
5
Estimated population of CMC areas that would not have been engaged in the absence of CLSM intervention ≈ Estimated number of households that would not have been engaged from CMC areas ∗ Average household size of CMC areas
 
6
\( \mathrm{Estimated}\ \mathrm{cost}\ \mathrm{per}\ \mathrm{per}\mathrm{son}\ \mathrm{reached}\ \left(\mathrm{Annual}\right)=\frac{Annual\ budget\ of\ the\ intervention}{Total\ population\ reached\ by\ the\ intervention} \)
 
Literature
7.
go back to reference Murphy E. Social mobilization lessons from the Core Group polio project in Angola, Ethiopia, and India. Washington, D.C.; 2012. www.coregroup.org. Accessed 28 February 2020. Murphy E. Social mobilization lessons from the Core Group polio project in Angola, Ethiopia, and India. Washington, D.C.; 2012. www.​coregroup.​org. Accessed 28 February 2020.
16.
go back to reference Choudhary M, Solomon R, Awale J, Dey R, Singh JP, Weiss W. Significance of a social mobilization intervention for engaging communities in polio vaccination campaigns: Evidence from CORE Group polio project, Uttar Pradesh, India. JoGH. 2021;11:1-12. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.07011. Choudhary M, Solomon R, Awale J, Dey R, Singh JP, Weiss W. Significance of a social mobilization intervention for engaging communities in polio vaccination campaigns: Evidence from CORE Group polio project, Uttar Pradesh, India. JoGH. 2021;11:1-12. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7189/​jogh.​11.​07011.
21.
go back to reference Linden A. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J. 2015;15:480–500. doi: The Stata Journal. Linden A. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J. 2015;15:480–500. doi: The Stata Journal.
22.
go back to reference Villa JM. diff: Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects. Stata J. 2016;16:52–71. doi: The Stata Journal. Villa JM. diff: Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects. Stata J. 2016;16:52–71. doi: The Stata Journal.
24.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata statistical software 15.1. 2017. StataCorp. Stata statistical software 15.1. 2017.
29.
go back to reference CGPP India. Monthly Progress report - November 2013. Gurgaon, India: Unpublished; 2013. CGPP India. Monthly Progress report - November 2013. Gurgaon, India: Unpublished; 2013.
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of a community-level social mobilization intervention in achieving the outcomes of polio vaccination campaigns during the post-polio-endemic period: Evidence from CORE Group polio project in Uttar Pradesh, India
Authors
Manojkumar Choudhary
Roma Solomon
Jitendra Awale
Rina Dey
Jagajeet Prasad Singh
William Weiss
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11425-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Public Health 1/2021 Go to the issue