Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Obesity | Research article

Who is responsible for assessing children’s weight status? – a qualitative study of health professionals in regional Australia

Authors: Kamila Davidson, Helen Vidgen, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson, Lynne Daniels

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Currently in Australia there is a lack of clarity regarding routine assessment of primary school aged children’s weight status despite it being the first step in the identification of overweight and obesity. The National Health and Medical Research Council Obesity Guidelines recommend primary health care professionals include routine weight status assessment in consultations with children yet research suggests this rarely occurs in practice.
This study aimed to determine the views of primary health care professionals regarding routine weight status assessment in primary school aged children and to establish the barriers to assessing children’s weight status.

Methods

Using the case study of a regional town, Rockhampton, purposeful sampling was used to represent the key primary health care settings and professional groups. Interviews were conducted with 31 health professionals. Data were collected and analysed guided by two frameworks, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour and Theoretical Domains Frameworks.

Results

Eight themes emerged from data and these were relevant to the three levels of influence on the routine weight status of assessment, system, setting and individual. System level themes related to having a formalised program for the undertaking of routine weight status assessment in primary school aged children, increasing the population’s awareness about the importance of the weight status check and limited public health services available for management of childhood overweight and obesity. Setting level theme regarded the location where routine weight status in primary school aged children could be undertaken. Four themes at the individual level of influence on the routine weight status assessment related to the primary health professionals’ roles, barriers to assessing children’s weight status, methods of weight status assessment and starting a weight related conversations with families.

Conclusion

The Government, primary health care services, professional organisations and associations as well as health professionals must commit to long-term implementation of the Obesity Guidelines. Immediate action to improve the undertaking of routine weight status assessment in children must be taken by each health service and health professional. Strategies should aim to positively affect motivation to assess children’s weight status as it is the central component in creating change in practice.
Literature
11.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The measurement of patient experience in non-GP primary health care setting. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2014. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The measurement of patient experience in non-GP primary health care setting. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2014.
16.
go back to reference King LA, Loss JHM, Wilkenfeld RL, Pagnini DL, Booth ML, Booth SL. Australian GPs' perceptions about child and adolescent overweight and obesity the weight of opinion study. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:124–9.PubMedPubMedCentral King LA, Loss JHM, Wilkenfeld RL, Pagnini DL, Booth ML, Booth SL. Australian GPs' perceptions about child and adolescent overweight and obesity the weight of opinion study. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:124–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Michie S, Atkins L, West R, The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. 2014. Michie S, Atkins L, West R, The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. 2014.
25.
go back to reference NVivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd. 2016. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd. 2016.
29.
go back to reference Dettori H, Elliott H, Horn J, Leong G. Barriers to the management of obesity in children - a cross sectional survey of GPs. Aust Fam Physician. 2009;38:460–4.PubMed Dettori H, Elliott H, Horn J, Leong G. Barriers to the management of obesity in children - a cross sectional survey of GPs. Aust Fam Physician. 2009;38:460–4.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Gould GS, Bar-Zeev Y, Bovill M, Atkins L, Gruppetta M, Clarke MJ, et al. Designing an implementation intervention with the behaviour change wheel for health provider smoking cessation care for Australian indigenous pregnant women. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0645-1. Gould GS, Bar-Zeev Y, Bovill M, Atkins L, Gruppetta M, Clarke MJ, et al. Designing an implementation intervention with the behaviour change wheel for health provider smoking cessation care for Australian indigenous pregnant women. 2017. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13012-017-0645-1.
Metadata
Title
Who is responsible for assessing children’s weight status? – a qualitative study of health professionals in regional Australia
Authors
Kamila Davidson
Helen Vidgen
Elizabeth Denney-Wilson
Lynne Daniels
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7539-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue