Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

A qualitative study of health promotion in academy schools in England

Authors: Patricia E. Jessiman, Rona Campbell, Russ Jago, Esther M. F. Van Sluijs, Dorothy Newbury-Birch

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Schools are an important setting for health promotion. In England, around one third of publicly funded schools have become independent of local authorities since 2000 and are now academies, run by an academy trust. The aim of this research was to examine attitudes towards health promotion held by academy trust leaders and senior staff. The research questions were: 1. How do academy trusts in England perceive their role in health promotion amongst students? 2. How are decisions around health promotion made in academy trusts? 3. What factors inhibit and encourage health promotion in academy schools? 4. How might public health academics and practitioners best engage with academy schools to facilitate health promotion activity and research?

Methods

Qualitative study utilising semi-structured interviews. Twenty five academy and school leaders were purposively sampled to achieve variation in trust size and type. In addition, five respondents were recruited from public and third-sector agencies seeking to work with or influence academy trusts around health promotion. Framework analysis was used to determine emergent themes and identify relationships between themes and respondent type. Early findings were triangulated at a stakeholder event with 40 delegates from academia, local authority public health teams, and third sector organisations.

Results

There is wide variation amongst senior academy and trust leaders in how they perceive the role of academies in promoting health and wellbeing amongst students. There is also variability in whether academy trusts responsible for more than one school adopt a centralised strategy to health promotion or allow individual schools autonomy. This was dependent on the trust leaders’ attitude and interest in health promotion rather than any perceived external accountability. Identified barriers to health promotion include financial constraints, a narrow focus on educational outcomes and school performance, and limited understanding about effective health interventions.

Conclusion

In the current absence of national policy or guidance around health promotion in schools, health has variable status in academies in England. There is a need to better engage all academy trusts in health promotion and support them to implement a strategic approach to health promotion.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonell C, Humphrey N, Fletcher A, Moor L, Anderson R, Campbell R. Why schools should promote students’ health and wellbeing. BMJ. 2014;348:g3078.CrossRef Bonell C, Humphrey N, Fletcher A, Moor L, Anderson R, Campbell R. Why schools should promote students’ health and wellbeing. BMJ. 2014;348:g3078.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hutchings M, Francis B. Chain effects 2018: the impact of academy chains on low-income pupils. London: The Sutton Trust; 2018. Hutchings M, Francis B. Chain effects 2018: the impact of academy chains on low-income pupils. London: The Sutton Trust; 2018.
11.
go back to reference Ehren MCM, Godfrey D. External accountability of collaborative arrangements; a case study of a multi academy Trust in England. Educ Assess Eval Account. 2017;29(4):339–62.CrossRef Ehren MCM, Godfrey D. External accountability of collaborative arrangements; a case study of a multi academy Trust in England. Educ Assess Eval Account. 2017;29(4):339–62.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wilkins A. Rescaling the local: multi-academy trusts, private monopoly and statecraft in England. J Educ Admin History. 2017;49(2):171–85.CrossRef Wilkins A. Rescaling the local: multi-academy trusts, private monopoly and statecraft in England. J Educ Admin History. 2017;49(2):171–85.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Harvey WS. Methodological approaches for interviewing elites. Geogr Compass. 2010;4:193–205.CrossRef Harvey WS. Methodological approaches for interviewing elites. Geogr Compass. 2010;4:193–205.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Richards D. Elite interviewing: approaches and pitfalls. Politics. 1996;16:199–204.CrossRef Richards D. Elite interviewing: approaches and pitfalls. Politics. 1996;16:199–204.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goldstein K. Getting in the door: sampling and completing elite interviews. Polit Sci Polit. 2002;35:669–72.CrossRef Goldstein K. Getting in the door: sampling and completing elite interviews. Polit Sci Polit. 2002;35:669–72.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Berry J. Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. Polit Sci Polit. 2002;35:379–682. Berry J. Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing. Polit Sci Polit. 2002;35:379–682.
20.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
21.
go back to reference Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRef Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Spencer L, Ritchie J, O'Connor W, Morrell G, Ormston R. Analysis in practice. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage; 2014. p. P295–343. Spencer L, Ritchie J, O'Connor W, Morrell G, Ormston R. Analysis in practice. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R, editors. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage; 2014. p. P295–343.
23.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana JM. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana JM. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
Metadata
Title
A qualitative study of health promotion in academy schools in England
Authors
Patricia E. Jessiman
Rona Campbell
Russ Jago
Esther M. F. Van Sluijs
Dorothy Newbury-Birch
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7510-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue