Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

A cross-sectional analysis of the associations between leisure-time sedentary behaviors and clustered cardiometabolic risk

Authors: Antje Ullrich, Lisa Voigt, Sophie Baumann, Franziska Weymar, Ulrich John, Marcus Dörr, Sabina Ulbricht

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive investigation of the association between different types of leisure-time sedentary behavior (watching television, using a computer, reading and socializing) and clustered cardiometabolic risk in apparently healthy adults aged 40 to 65 years.

Methods

One hundred seventy-three participants from the general population (64% women; mean age = 54.4 years) consented to attend a cardiovascular examination program and to complete a questionnaire on leisure-time sedentary behaviors. Waist circumference, blood pressure, glucose, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of non-fasting blood samples were assessed, and a clustered cardiometabolic risk score [CMRS] was calculated. Data were collected between February and July 2015. Associations between leisure-time sedentary behaviors and CMRS were analyzed using linear and quantile regression, adjusted for socio-demographic variables and other types of leisure-time sedentary behavior (model 1) and additionally, adjusted for leisure-time physical activity and traveling in motor vehicles (model 2).

Results

Linear regression revealed that there was a positive association between watching television and CMRS (model 1: b = 0.27 [CI: 0.03; 0.52]; model 2: b = 0.30 [CI: 0.05; 0.56]). In addition, quantile regression analysis revealed that using a computer was negatively associated with the 50th (model 1: b = − 0.43 [CI: -0.79; − 0.07]) and the 75th percentiles (model 1: b = − 0.71 [CI: -1.27; − 0.14]) of CMRS. Reading and socializing were not associated with CMRS.

Conclusions

Watching television was positively associated with a clustered cardiometabolic risk score, while time spent using a computer revealed inconsistent findings. Our results give reason to consider different types of behaviors in which individuals are sedentary and the associations between these behaviors and cardiometabolic risk, supporting the need for behavior-specific assessments as well as public health recommendations to maintain or enhance adults’ health.

Trial registration

Clinical trial registration number: NCT02990039, Retrospectively registered (December 12, 2016).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
14.
go back to reference Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(9):2289–304.CrossRefPubMed Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(9):2289–304.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Knaeps S, Bourgois JG, Charlier R, Mertens E, Lefevre J, Wijndaele K. Ten-year change in sedentary behaviour, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic risk: independent associations and mediation analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096083. Knaeps S, Bourgois JG, Charlier R, Mertens E, Lefevre J, Wijndaele K. Ten-year change in sedentary behaviour, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic risk: independent associations and mediation analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bjsports-2016-096083.
22.
go back to reference Wijndaele K, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Godino JG, Lynch BM, Griffin SJ, Westgate K, et al. Reliability and validity of a domain-specific last 7-d sedentary time questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(6):1248–60. Wijndaele K, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Godino JG, Lynch BM, Griffin SJ, Westgate K, et al. Reliability and validity of a domain-specific last 7-d sedentary time questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(6):1248–60.
25.
go back to reference Osborne J. Notes on the use of data transformations. Pract. Assess., Res. Eval. 2002;8(6):1–7. Osborne J. Notes on the use of data transformations. Pract. Assess., Res. Eval. 2002;8(6):1–7.
27.
28.
go back to reference Koenker R. Quantile regression. Econometric society monographs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef Koenker R. Quantile regression. Econometric society monographs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; c2002. Menard S. Applied logistic regression analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; c2002.
30.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14.1. TX: StataCorp LP, College Station; 2015. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14.1. TX: StataCorp LP, College Station; 2015.
37.
go back to reference Craig SR, Amin RV, Russell DW, Paradise NF. Blood cholesterol screening influence of fasting state on cholesterol results and management decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(6):395–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Craig SR, Amin RV, Russell DW, Paradise NF. Blood cholesterol screening influence of fasting state on cholesterol results and management decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(6):395–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A cross-sectional analysis of the associations between leisure-time sedentary behaviors and clustered cardiometabolic risk
Authors
Antje Ullrich
Lisa Voigt
Sophie Baumann
Franziska Weymar
Ulrich John
Marcus Dörr
Sabina Ulbricht
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5213-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue