Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

A cross-sectional analysis of green space prevalence and mental wellbeing in England

Authors: Victoria Houlden, Scott Weich, Stephen Jarvis

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With urbanisation increasing, it is important to understand how to design changing environments to promote mental wellbeing. Evidence suggests that local-area proportions of green space may be associated with happiness and life satisfaction; however, the available evidence on such associations with more broadly defined mental wellbeing in still very scarce. This study aimed to establish whether the amount of neighbourhood green space was associated with mental wellbeing.

Methods

Data were drawn from Understanding Society, a national survey of 30,900 individuals across 11,096 Census Lower-Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in England, over the period 2009–2010. Measures included the multi-dimensional Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS) and LSOA proportion of green space, which was derived from the General Land Use Database (GLUD), and were analysed using linear regression, while controlling for individual, household and area-level factors.

Results

Those living in areas with greater proportions of green space had significantly higher mental wellbeing scores in unadjusted analyses (an expected increase of 0.17 points (95% CI 0.11, 0.23) in the SWEMWBS score for a standard deviation increase of green space). However, after adjustment for confounding by respondent sociodemographic characteristics and urban/rural location, the association was attenuated to the null (regression coefficient B = − 0.01, 95% CI -0.08, 0.05, p = 0.712).

Conclusions

While the green space in an individual’s local area has been shown through other research to be related to aspects of mental health such as happiness and life satisfaction, the association with multidimensional mental wellbeing is much less clear from our results. While we did not find a statistically significant association between the amount of green space in residents’ local areas and mental wellbeing, further research is needed to understand whether other features of green space, such as accessibility, aesthetics or use, are important for mental wellbeing.
Literature
1.
De Vries S, et al. Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environ Plan. 2003;35(10):1717–31.CrossRef
2.
Lachowycz K, Jones AP. Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: development of a theoretical framework. Landsc Urban Plan. 2013;118:62–9.CrossRef
3.
United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects 2014. New York: United Nations Publication; 2014.
4.
Paykel E, et al. Urban–rural mental health differences in Great Britain: findings from the National Morbidity Survey. Psychol Med. 2000;30(2):269–80.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Sundquist K, Frank G, Sundquist J. Urbanisation and incidence of psychosis and depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;184(4):293–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Probst JC, et al. Rural-urban differences in depression prevalence: implications for family medicine. Fam Med Kansas City. 2006;38:9.
7.
Mitchell R, Popham F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1655–60.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Mitchell RJ, et al. Neighborhood environments and socioeconomic inequalities in mental well-being. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(1):80–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
De Neve JE, Oswald AJ. Estimating the influence of life satisfaction and positive affect on later income using sibling fixed effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(49):19953–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Oswald AJ, Proto E, Sgroi D. Happiness and productivity. 2009.
12.
Ashkanasy NM. International happiness: A multilevel perspective. Acad Manag Perspect. 2011;25(1):23–9.CrossRef
13.
Cassiers I. Beyond GDP, Measuring progress, true wealth, and the well-being of nations: Conference Proceedings. 2009.
14.
Evans J, Macrory I, Randall C. Measuring National Well-being: Life in the UK, 2015. Office for National Statistics. 2015. http://​webarchive.​nationalarchives​.​gov.​uk/​20160105160709/​http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_398059.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2017.
15.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):141–66.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Henderson LW, Knight T. Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. Int J Wellbeing. 2012;2:3.CrossRef
17.
O'Donnell G, Oswald AJ. National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings. Ecol Econ. 2015;120:59–70.CrossRef
18.
Tennant R, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:1.CrossRef
19.
World Health Organization, Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice: Summary report. 2004.
20.
Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Daily GC. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1249(1):118–36.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mitchell R. Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments? Soc Sci Med. 2013;91:130–4.CrossRefPubMed
22.
White M, et al. Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(6):920–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Alcock I, et al. Longitudinal effects on mental health of moving to greener and less green urban areas. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(2):1247–55.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Seresinhe CI, Preis T, Moat HS. Quantifying the impact of scenic environments on health. Sci Rep. 2015;5
25.
England N. Nature nearby: accessible natural greenspace guidance. Natural England: Peterborough; 2010.
26.
Wilson EO. Biophilia. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1984.
27.
Wilson EO. Biophilia and the conservation ethic. Evol Perspect Environ Problems. 2007:49–257.
28.
Kaplan R. Impact of urban nature: A theoretical analysis. Urban Ecol. 1984;8(3):189–97.CrossRef
29.
Berman MG. Jonides, Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(12):1207–12.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Kaplan S. Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environ Behav. 2001;33(4):480–506.CrossRef
31.
Hartig T, et al. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J Environ Psychol. 2003;23(2):109–23.CrossRef
32.
Ulrich RS. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan. 1986;13:29–44.CrossRef
33.
Ulrich RS, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991;11(3):201–30.CrossRef
34.
Ulrich R. View through a window may influence recovery. Science. 1984;224(4647):224–5.CrossRef
35.
Jiang B, Chang CY, Sullivan WC. A dose of nature: Tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences. Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;132:26–36.CrossRef
36.
Carrus G, et al. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015;134:221–8.CrossRef
37.
Staats H, Van Gemerden E, Hartig T. Preference for restorative situations: Interactive effects of attentional state, activity-in-environment, and social context. Leis Sci. 2010;32(5):401–17.CrossRef
38.
Van den Berg AE, et al. Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(8):1203–10.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Nordh H, et al. Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban For Urban Green. 2009;8(4):225–35.CrossRef
40.
Nordh H, Østby K. Pocket parks for people–A study of park design and use. Urban For Urban Green. 2013;12(1):12–7.CrossRef
41.
Bell SL, et al. Seeking everyday wellbeing: The coast as a therapeutic landscape. Soc Sci Med. 2015;142:56–67.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Lee SW, et al. Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 2008;85(1):60–70.CrossRef
43.
Lo AY, Jim C. Citizen attitude and expectation towards greenspace provision in compact urban milieu. Land Use Policy. 2012;29(3):577–86.CrossRef
44.
Mullaney J, Lucke T, Trueman SJ. A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015;134:157–66.CrossRef
45.
Petersen LK. The materiality of everyday practices in urban greenspace. J Environ Policy Plan. 2013;15(3):353–70.CrossRef
46.
Dempsey N, Brown C, Bramley G. The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Prog Plan. 2012;77(3):89–141.CrossRef
47.
Maas J, et al. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place. 2009;15(2):586–95.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Maas J, et al. Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:1.CrossRef
49.
Kimpton A, Wickes R, Corcoran J. Greenspace and Place Attachment: Do Greener Suburbs Lead to Greater Residential Place Attachment? Urban Policy Res. 2014;32(4):477–97.CrossRef
50.
White MP, et al. Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(6):920–8.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Weimann H, et al. Effects of changing exposure to neighbourhood greenness on general and mental health: A longitudinal study. Health Place. 2015;33:48–56.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Astell-Burt T, Mitchell R, Hartig T. The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(6):578–83.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Seligman ME. Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2004.
54.
Halpern D. Mental health and the built environment: more than bricks and mortar? Routledge; 2014.
55.
Li HN, et al. On the study of the effects of sea views, greenery views and personal characteristics on noise annoyance perception at homes. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012;131(3):2131–40.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Ward Thompson C, Aspinall P, Roe J. Access to green space in disadvantaged urban communities: evidence of salutogenic effects based on biomarker and self-report measures of wellbeing. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;153:10–22.CrossRef
57.
Verheij R, Maas J, Groenewegen P. Urban—rural health differences and the availability of green space. Eur Urban Reg Stud. 2008;15(4):307–16.CrossRef
58.
59.
60.
Galea S, Vlahov D. Urban health: evidence, challenges, and directions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:341–65.CrossRefPubMed
61.
University of Essex. Institute for Social and Economic Research, Understanding Society: Waves 1-5. UK Data Service. 2009-2014:2015.
62.
Buck N, McFall S. Understanding Society: design overview. Longitudinal Life Course Stud2011;3:1:5-17.
63.
64.
65.
Ambrey C, Fleming C. Public greenspace and life satisfaction in urban Australia. Urban Stud. 2014;51(6):1290–321.CrossRef
66.
Department for Communities for Local Government. The English Indices of Deprivation 2010. p. 2010.
67.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Generalised Land Use Database Statistics for England. London: Communities and Local Government; 2005.
68.
Government Satistical Service. The 2011 Rural-Urban Classification for Local Authority Districts in England, F.a.R.A. Department for the Environment. Sheffield. 2015.
69.
The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R version 3.1.2. 2014.
70.
Lumley T. Analysis of complex survey samples. J Stat Softw. 2004;9(1):1–19.
71.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. Texas: StataCorp LP; 2015.
72.
Lynn PJ, et al. An initial look at non-response and attrition in Understanding Society. 2012.
73.
Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Kolt GS. Mental health benefits of neighbourhood green space are stronger among physically active adults in middle-to-older age: evidence from 260,061 Australians. Prev Med. 2013;57(5):601–6.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Taylor L, Hochuli DF. Creating better cities: how biodiversity and ecosystem functioning enhance urban residents’ wellbeing. Urban Ecosyst. 2015;18(3):747–62.CrossRef
75.
Wheeler BW, et al. Beyond greenspace: an ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality. Int J Health Geogr. 2015;14:1.CrossRef
76.
Francis J, et al. Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(10):1570–7.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Van den Berg AE, Jorgensen A, Wilson ER. Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;127:173–81.CrossRef
78.
Gatersleben B, Andrews M. When walking in nature is not restorative—The role of prospect and refuge. Health Place. 2013;20:91–101.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A cross-sectional analysis of green space prevalence and mental wellbeing in England
Authors
Victoria Houlden
Scott Weich
Stephen Jarvis
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4401-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Views of policy makers and health promotion professionals on factors facilitating implementation and maintenance of interventions and policies promoting physical activity and healthy eating: results of the DEDIPAC project

Research article

Non-adherence to anti-retroviral therapy among HIV infected adults in Mon State of Myanmar

Research article

Mujeres Fuertes y Corazones Saludables: adaptation of the StrongWomen —healthy hearts program for rural Latinas using an intervention mapping approach

Research article

Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection among children living in a rural setting in Sub-Saharan Africa

Research article

Retirement and mental health: does social participation mitigate the association? A fixed-effects longitudinal analysis

Research article

Fast food consumption and its associations with obesity and hypertension among children: results from the baseline data of the Childhood Obesity Study in China Mega-cities