Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

Authors: Mandira Paul, Sharad D. Iyengar, Birgitta Essén, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Kirti Iyengar, Johan Bring, Marie Klingberg-Allvin

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Post-abortion contraceptive use in India is low and the use of modern methods of contraception is rare, especially in rural areas. This study primarily compares contraceptive use among women whose abortion outcome was assessed in-clinic with women who assessed their abortion outcome at home, in a low-resource, primary health care setting. Moreover, it investigates how background characteristics and abortion service provision influences contraceptive use post-abortion.

Methods

A randomized controlled, non-inferiority, trial (RCT) compared clinic follow-up with home-assessment of abortion outcome at 2 weeks post-abortion. Additionally, contraceptive-use at 3 months post-abortion was investigated through a cross-sectional follow-up interview with a largely urban sub-sample of women from the RCT. Women seeking abortion with a gestational age of up to 9 weeks and who agreed to a 2-week follow-up were included (n = 731). Women with known contraindications to medical abortions, Hb < 85 mg/l and aged below 18 were excluded. Data were collected between April 2013 and August 2014 in six primary health-care clinics in Rajasthan. A computerised random number generator created the randomisation sequence (1:1) in blocks of six. Contraceptive use was measured at 2 weeks among women successfully followed-up (n = 623) and 3 months in the sub-set of women who were included if they were recruited at one of the urban study sites, owned a phone and agreed to a 3-month follow-up (n = 114).

Results

There were no differences between contraceptive use and continuation between study groups at 3 months (76 % clinic follow-up, 77 % home-assessment), however women in the clinic follow-up group were most likely to adopt a contraceptive method at 2 weeks (62 ± 12 %), while women in the home-assessment group were most likely to adopt a method after next menstruation (60 ± 13 %). Fifty-two per cent of women who initiated a method at 2 weeks chose the 3-month injection or the copper intrauterine device. Only 4 % of women preferred sterilization. Caste, educational attainment, or type of residence did not influence contraceptive use.

Conclusions

Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion will not change women’s opportunities to access contraception in a low-resource setting, if contraceptive services are provided as intra-abortion services as early as on day one. Women’s postabortion contraceptive use at 3 months is unlikely to be affected by mode of followup after medical abortion, also in a low-resource setting. Clinical guidelines need to encourage intra-abortion contraception, offering the full spectrum of evidence-based methods, especially long-acting reversible methods.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01827995
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012;380:149–56.CrossRefPubMed Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012;380:149–56.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference World Health Organizaton. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012. World Health Organizaton. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
3.
go back to reference Curtis C, Huber D, Moss-Knight T. Postabortion family planning: addressing the cycle of repeat unintended pregnancy and abortion. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;36:44–8.CrossRefPubMed Curtis C, Huber D, Moss-Knight T. Postabortion family planning: addressing the cycle of repeat unintended pregnancy and abortion. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;36:44–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45:151–69.CrossRefPubMed Sedgh G, Hussain R. Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann. 2014;45:151–69.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ali MM, Cleland JG, Shah IH. Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: evidence from 60 demographic and health surveys. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO). 2012. Ali MM, Cleland JG, Shah IH. Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: evidence from 60 demographic and health surveys. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO). 2012.
6.
go back to reference Padmadas SS, Lyons-Amos M, Thapa S. Contraceptive behavior among women after abortion in Nepal. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;127:132–7.CrossRef Padmadas SS, Lyons-Amos M, Thapa S. Contraceptive behavior among women after abortion in Nepal. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;127:132–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. District Level Household and Facility survey, DLHS-3. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (Deemed University). 2008. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. District Level Household and Facility survey, DLHS-3. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (Deemed University). 2008.
8.
go back to reference Bellizzi S, Sobel HL, Obara H, Temmerman M. Underuse of modern methods of contraception: underlying causes and consequent undesired pregnancies in 35 low- and middle-income countries. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1–14.CrossRef Bellizzi S, Sobel HL, Obara H, Temmerman M. Underuse of modern methods of contraception: underlying causes and consequent undesired pregnancies in 35 low- and middle-income countries. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1–14.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Paul M, Essén B, Sariola S, Iyengar S, Soni S, Allvin MK. Negotiating Collective and Individual Agency : A Qualitative Study of Young Women’s Reproductive Health in Rural India. Qual Health Res. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. Paul M, Essén B, Sariola S, Iyengar S, Soni S, Allvin MK. Negotiating Collective and Individual Agency : A Qualitative Study of Young Women’s Reproductive Health in Rural India. Qual Health Res. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
10.
go back to reference Zavier AJF, Padmadas SS. Postabortion contraceptive use and method continuation in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;118:65–70.CrossRef Zavier AJF, Padmadas SS. Postabortion contraceptive use and method continuation in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;118:65–70.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kalyanwala S, Acharya R, Francis Zavier AJ. Adoption and continuation of contraception following medical or surgical abortion in Bihar and Jharkhand, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118 Suppl:S47–51.CrossRef Kalyanwala S, Acharya R, Francis Zavier AJ. Adoption and continuation of contraception following medical or surgical abortion in Bihar and Jharkhand, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118 Suppl:S47–51.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jejeebhoy SJ, Zavier AJF. Injectable contraceptives: Perspectives and experiences of women and health care providers in India. 2012. Jejeebhoy SJ, Zavier AJF. Injectable contraceptives: Perspectives and experiences of women and health care providers in India. 2012.
13.
go back to reference National Rural Health Mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Comprehensive abortion care - training and service delivery guidelines. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India; 2010. National Rural Health Mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Comprehensive abortion care - training and service delivery guidelines. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India; 2010.
14.
go back to reference Jejeebhoy S, Francis Zavier AJ, Acharya R, Kalyanwala S. Increasing access to safe abortion in rural Rajasthan: outcomes of a comprehensive abortion care model. 2011. Jejeebhoy S, Francis Zavier AJ, Acharya R, Kalyanwala S. Increasing access to safe abortion in rural Rajasthan: outcomes of a comprehensive abortion care model. 2011.
15.
go back to reference Stillman M, Frost JJ, Singh S, Moore AM, Kalyanwala S. Abortion in India : A Literature Review. New York: Guttmacher Institute. 2014. Stillman M, Frost JJ, Singh S, Moore AM, Kalyanwala S. Abortion in India : A Literature Review. New York: Guttmacher Institute. 2014.
16.
go back to reference Fiala C, Gemzel-Danielsson K. Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue. Contraception. 2006;74:66–86.CrossRefPubMed Fiala C, Gemzel-Danielsson K. Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue. Contraception. 2006;74:66–86.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Von Hertzen H, Huong NTM, Piaggio G, Bayalag M, Cabezas E, Fang AH. Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised controlled noninferiority trial. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:1186–96.CrossRef Von Hertzen H, Huong NTM, Piaggio G, Bayalag M, Cabezas E, Fang AH. Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised controlled noninferiority trial. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:1186–96.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Iyengar K, Paul M, Iyengar SD, Klingberg-allvin M, Essén B, Bring J, Soni S, Gemzell-danielsson K. Self-assessment of the outcome of early medical abortion versus clinic follow-up in India: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Glob Heal. 2015;3:e537–45.CrossRef Iyengar K, Paul M, Iyengar SD, Klingberg-allvin M, Essén B, Bring J, Soni S, Gemzell-danielsson K. Self-assessment of the outcome of early medical abortion versus clinic follow-up in India: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Glob Heal. 2015;3:e537–45.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Oppegaard KS, Qvigstad E, Fiala C, Heikinheimo O, Benson L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;6736:1–7. Oppegaard KS, Qvigstad E, Fiala C, Heikinheimo O, Benson L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;6736:1–7.
20.
go back to reference Paul M, Iyengar K, Essén B, Gemzell- Danielsson K, Iyengar SD, Bring J, et al. Acceptability of Home-Assessment Post Medical Abortion and Medical Abortion in a Low-Resource Setting in Rajasthan, India. Secondary Outcome Analysis of a Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0133354. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0133354. Paul M, Iyengar K, Essén B, Gemzell- Danielsson K, Iyengar SD, Bring J, et al. Acceptability of Home-Assessment Post Medical Abortion and Medical Abortion in a Low-Resource Setting in Rajasthan, India. Secondary Outcome Analysis of a Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0133354. doi:10.​1371/​ journal.​pone.​0133354.
21.
go back to reference Grossman D, Ellertson C, Grimes DA, Walker D. Routine follow-up visits after first-trimester induced abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:738–45.CrossRefPubMed Grossman D, Ellertson C, Grimes DA, Walker D. Routine follow-up visits after first-trimester induced abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:738–45.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF. CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet. 2008;371:281–3.CrossRefPubMed Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF. CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet. 2008;371:281–3.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Paul M, Iyengar K, Iyengar S, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Essén B, Klingberg-Allvin M. Simplified follow-up after medical abortion using a low-sensitivity urinary pregnancy test and a pictorial instruction sheet in Rajasthan, India - study protocol and intervention adaptation of a randomised control trial. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paul M, Iyengar K, Iyengar S, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Essén B, Klingberg-Allvin M. Simplified follow-up after medical abortion using a low-sensitivity urinary pregnancy test and a pictorial instruction sheet in Rajasthan, India - study protocol and intervention adaptation of a randomised control trial. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Int Inst Pop Sci. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06, India: Key Findings. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). 2007. Int Inst Pop Sci. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06, India: Key Findings. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). 2007.
25.
go back to reference Langston AM, Joslin-Roher SL, Westhoff CL. Immediate postabortion access to IUDs, implants and DMPA reduces repeat pregnancy within 1 year in a New York City practice. Contraception. 2014;89:103–8.CrossRefPubMed Langston AM, Joslin-Roher SL, Westhoff CL. Immediate postabortion access to IUDs, implants and DMPA reduces repeat pregnancy within 1 year in a New York City practice. Contraception. 2014;89:103–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Barros Pereira I, Carvalho RM, Graça LM. Intra-abortion contraception with etonogestrel subdermal implant. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185:33–5.CrossRefPubMed Barros Pereira I, Carvalho RM, Graça LM. Intra-abortion contraception with etonogestrel subdermal implant. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185:33–5.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Ouédraogo R, Sundby J. Social determinants and access to induced abortion in Burkina Faso: from two case studies. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:402456.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ouédraogo R, Sundby J. Social determinants and access to induced abortion in Burkina Faso: from two case studies. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:402456.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
29.
go back to reference Elul B. Assessments of the importance of provider characteristics for abortion care: data from women in Rajasthan, India. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32:72–95.CrossRefPubMed Elul B. Assessments of the importance of provider characteristics for abortion care: data from women in Rajasthan, India. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32:72–95.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ertopçu K, Inal MM, Ozelmas I. Demographic analysis of post-abortive and interval-administered hormonal contraceptive methods. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005;10:1–5.CrossRefPubMed Ertopçu K, Inal MM, Ozelmas I. Demographic analysis of post-abortive and interval-administered hormonal contraceptive methods. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005;10:1–5.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lauro D. Abortion and contraceptive use in Sub-Saharan Africa: how women plan their families fertility control in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2011;15:13–24.PubMed Lauro D. Abortion and contraceptive use in Sub-Saharan Africa: how women plan their families fertility control in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2011;15:13–24.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Stoddard A, Eisenberg DL. Controversies in family planning: timing of ovulation after abortion and the conundrum of postabortion intrauterine device insertion. Contraception. 2011;84:119–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stoddard A, Eisenberg DL. Controversies in family planning: timing of ovulation after abortion and the conundrum of postabortion intrauterine device insertion. Contraception. 2011;84:119–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Sääv I, Stephansson O, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2012;7:1–6.CrossRef Sääv I, Stephansson O, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2012;7:1–6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H, Faúndes A. Contraception following abortion and the treatment of incomplete abortion. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;126:S52–5.CrossRef Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kopp Kallner H, Faúndes A. Contraception following abortion and the treatment of incomplete abortion. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;126:S52–5.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jain M, Modi J. An audit of obstetric admissions to intensive care unit in a medical college hospital of central india: lessons in preventing maternal morbidity and mortality. Int J Reprod Contraception Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:1.CrossRef Jain M, Modi J. An audit of obstetric admissions to intensive care unit in a medical college hospital of central india: lessons in preventing maternal morbidity and mortality. Int J Reprod Contraception Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:1.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hogmark S, Klingberg-Allvin M, Gemzell- Danielsson K, et al. Medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards contraceptive use and counselling: a cross- sectional survey in Maharashtra, India. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003739. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003739. Hogmark S, Klingberg-Allvin M, Gemzell- Danielsson K, et al. Medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards contraceptive use and counselling: a cross- sectional survey in Maharashtra, India. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003739. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2013-003739.
37.
go back to reference Ngoc NTN, Bracken H, Blum J, Nga NTB, Minh NH, van Nhang N, Lynd K, Winikoff B, Blumenthal PD. Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up after early medical abortion in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:88–95.CrossRefPubMed Ngoc NTN, Bracken H, Blum J, Nga NTB, Minh NH, van Nhang N, Lynd K, Winikoff B, Blumenthal PD. Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up after early medical abortion in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:88–95.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Does mode of follow-up influence contraceptive use after medical abortion in a low-resource setting? Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
Authors
Mandira Paul
Sharad D. Iyengar
Birgitta Essén
Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Kirti Iyengar
Johan Bring
Marie Klingberg-Allvin
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3726-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue