Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions

Authors: Josie Dickerson, Philippa K. Bird, Rosemary R. C. McEachan, Kate E. Pickett, Dagmar Waiblinger, Eleonora Uphoff, Dan Mason, Maria Bryant, Tracey Bywater, Claudine Bowyer-Crane, Pinki Sahota, Neil Small, Michaela Howell, Gill Thornton, Melanie Astin, Debbie A. Lawlor, John Wright

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Early interventions are recognised as key to improving life chances for children and reducing inequalities in health and well-being, however there is a paucity of high quality research into the effectiveness of interventions to address childhood health and development outcomes. Planning and implementing standalone RCTs for multiple, individual interventions would be slow, cumbersome and expensive. This paper describes the protocol for an innovative experimental birth cohort: Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) that will simultaneously evaluate the impact of multiple early life interventions using efficient study designs. Better Start Bradford (BSB) has been allocated £49 million from the Big Lottery Fund to implement 22 interventions to improve outcomes for children aged 0–3 in three key areas: social and emotional development; communication and language development; and nutrition and obesity. The interventions will be implemented in three deprived and ethnically diverse inner city areas of Bradford.

Method

The BiBBS study aims to recruit 5000 babies, their mothers and their mothers’ partners over 5 years from January 2016-December 2020. Demographic and socioeconomic information, physical and mental health, lifestyle factors and biological samples will be collected during pregnancy. Parents and children will be linked to their routine health and local authority (including education) data throughout the children’s lives. Their participation in BSB interventions will also be tracked. BiBBS will test interventions using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) approach and other quasi-experimental designs where TwiCs are neither feasible nor ethical, to evaluate these early life interventions. The effects of single interventions, and the cumulative effects of stacked (multiple) interventions on health and social outcomes during the critical early years will be measured.

Discussion

The focus of the BiBBS cohort is on intervention impact rather than observation. As far as we are aware BiBBS is the world’s first such experimental birth cohort study. While some risk factors for adverse health and social outcomes are increasingly well described, the solutions to tackling them remain elusive. The novel design of BiBBS can contribute much needed evidence to inform policy makers and practitioners about effective approaches to improve health and well-being for future generations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer. Our children deserve better: prevention pays. London: Department of Health; 2012. Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer. Our children deserve better: prevention pays. London: Department of Health; 2012.
2.
go back to reference Tickell D. The Early Years: Foundations for life, health and learning - An independent report on the Early Years Foundation Stage to Her Majesty’s Government. London: Department for Education; 2011. Tickell D. The Early Years: Foundations for life, health and learning - An independent report on the Early Years Foundation Stage to Her Majesty’s Government. London: Department for Education; 2011.
3.
go back to reference Allen G. Early intervention: The next steps - an independent report to Her Majesty’s Government. London: Department for Education; 2011. Allen G. Early intervention: The next steps - an independent report to Her Majesty’s Government. London: Department for Education; 2011.
4.
go back to reference WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: commission on social determinants of health final report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: commission on social determinants of health final report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
5.
go back to reference Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M, Geddes I. Fair society, healthy lives: strategic review of health inequalities in England post 2010. London: The Marmot Review; 2010. Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M, Geddes I. Fair society, healthy lives: strategic review of health inequalities in England post 2010. London: The Marmot Review; 2010.
6.
go back to reference Axford N, Barlow J. What works: An overview of the best available evidence on giving children a better start. Dartington: The Social Research Unit at Dartington; 2013. Axford N, Barlow J. What works: An overview of the best available evidence on giving children a better start. Dartington: The Social Research Unit at Dartington; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1995;274(22):1800–4.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1995;274(22):1800–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, Colthart IR, Ross S, Shepherd SM, Russell D. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. HTA. 1999;3(20):1–143.PubMed Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, Grant AM, Russell IT, Kiauka S, Colthart IR, Ross S, Shepherd SM, Russell D. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. HTA. 1999;3(20):1–143.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–92.CrossRefPubMed Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–92.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, Findlay A, Higgins C, Hoy C, Kearns A, Sparks L. Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health? Public Health. 2005;119(9):751–7.CrossRefPubMed Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, Findlay A, Higgins C, Hoy C, Kearns A, Sparks L. Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health? Public Health. 2005;119(9):751–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Reeves B, Sutton M, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new MRC guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(12):1182–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Reeves B, Sutton M, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new MRC guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(12):1182–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, Tuffnell D, Bhopal R, Cameron N, Fairley L, Lawlor DA, Parslow R, Petherick ES, et al. Cohort profile: The Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:978–91.CrossRefPubMed Wright J, Small N, Raynor P, Tuffnell D, Bhopal R, Cameron N, Fairley L, Lawlor DA, Parslow R, Petherick ES, et al. Cohort profile: The Born in Bradford multi-ethnic family cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:978–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Relton C, Torgerson D, O’Cathain A, Nicholl J. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design. BMJ. 2010;340. Relton C, Torgerson D, O’Cathain A, Nicholl J. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design. BMJ. 2010;340.
16.
go back to reference Raynor P, Born in Bradford Collaborative G. Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Raynor P, Born in Bradford Collaborative G. Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference (BAILII) BaILII: Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority. In: UKHL 7. 1985. (BAILII) BaILII: Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority. In: UKHL 7. 1985.
22.
go back to reference Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Data protection act. London: Stationery Office; 1998. Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Data protection act. London: Stationery Office; 1998.
23.
go back to reference West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, Gaist P, Des Jarlais DC, Holtgrave D, Szapocznik J, Fishbein M, Rapkin B, Clatts M, et al. Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1359–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, Gaist P, Des Jarlais DC, Holtgrave D, Szapocznik J, Fishbein M, Rapkin B, Clatts M, et al. Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1359–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Bor J, Moscoe E, Mutevedzi P, Newell M-L, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs in epidemiology: causal inference without randomized trials. Epidemiol. 2014;25(5):729–37.CrossRef Bor J, Moscoe E, Mutevedzi P, Newell M-L, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs in epidemiology: causal inference without randomized trials. Epidemiol. 2014;25(5):729–37.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Moscoe E, Bor J, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(2):132–43.CrossRef Moscoe E, Bor J, Bärnighausen T. Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(2):132–43.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Hasson H. Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Sci. 2010;5:67.CrossRef Hasson H. Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Sci. 2010;5:67.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wanless D. Securing good health for the whole population. Final Report. London: The Stationery Office; 2004. Wanless D. Securing good health for the whole population. Final Report. London: The Stationery Office; 2004.
30.
go back to reference Robling M, Bekkers M-J, Bell K, Butler CC, Cannings-John R, Channon S, Martin BC, Gregory JW, Hood K, Kemp A. Effectiveness of a nurse-led intensive home-visitation programme for first-time teenage mothers (Building Blocks): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):146–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robling M, Bekkers M-J, Bell K, Butler CC, Cannings-John R, Channon S, Martin BC, Gregory JW, Hood K, Kemp A. Effectiveness of a nurse-led intensive home-visitation programme for first-time teenage mothers (Building Blocks): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):146–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Olds DL, Henderson Jr CR, Chamberlin R, Tatelbaum R. Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics. 1986;78(1):65–78.PubMed Olds DL, Henderson Jr CR, Chamberlin R, Tatelbaum R. Preventing child abuse and neglect: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics. 1986;78(1):65–78.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Kitzman H, Olds DL, Henderson Jr CR, Hanks C, Cole R, Tatelbaum R, McConnochie KM, Sidora K, Luckey DW, Shaver D, et al. Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(8):644–52.CrossRefPubMed Kitzman H, Olds DL, Henderson Jr CR, Hanks C, Cole R, Tatelbaum R, McConnochie KM, Sidora K, Luckey DW, Shaver D, et al. Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278(8):644–52.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Olds DL, Robinson J, O’Brien R, Luckey DW, Pettitt LM, Henderson Jr CR, Ng RK, Sheff KL, Korfmacher J, Hiatt S, et al. Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):486–96.CrossRefPubMed Olds DL, Robinson J, O’Brien R, Luckey DW, Pettitt LM, Henderson Jr CR, Ng RK, Sheff KL, Korfmacher J, Hiatt S, et al. Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):486–96.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics, 2011 Census: Neighbourhood statistics, Ethnic Group, 2011 (KS201EW). Aggregated to derive ‘Better Start Bradford’; sources: http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=13689850&c=bowling+and+barkerend&d=14&e=62&g=6369228&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&o=362&m=0&r=1&s=1464882068594&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2477. http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=13689851&c=bradford+moor&d=14&e=62&g=6369232&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&o=362&m=0&r=1&s=1464882041781&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2477. http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=13689863&c=little+horton&d=14&e=62&g=6369257&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&o=362&m=0&r=1&s=1464881977688&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2477. Accessed: 22/04/2016 Office for National Statistics, 2011 Census: Neighbourhood statistics, Ethnic Group, 2011 (KS201EW). Aggregated to derive ‘Better Start Bradford’; sources: http://​www.​neighbourhood.​statistics.​gov.​uk/​dissemination/​LeadTableView.​do?​a=​7&​b=​13689850&​c=​bowling+and+bark​erend&​d=​14&​e=​62&​g=​6369228&​i=​1001x1003x1032x1​004&​o=​362&​m=​0&​r=​1&​s=​1464882068594&​enc=​1&​dsFamilyId=​2477. http://​www.​neighbourhood.​statistics.​gov.​uk/​dissemination/​LeadTableView.​do?​a=​7&​b=​13689851&​c=​bradford+moor&​d=​14&​e=​62&​g=​6369232&​i=​1001x1003x1032x1​004&​o=​362&​m=​0&​r=​1&​s=​1464882041781&​enc=​1&​dsFamilyId=​2477.​ http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=13689863&c=little+horton&d=14&e=62&g=6369257&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&o=362&m=0&r=1&s=1464881977688&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2477. Accessed: 22/04/2016
Metadata
Title
Born in Bradford’s Better Start: an experimental birth cohort study to evaluate the impact of early life interventions
Authors
Josie Dickerson
Philippa K. Bird
Rosemary R. C. McEachan
Kate E. Pickett
Dagmar Waiblinger
Eleonora Uphoff
Dan Mason
Maria Bryant
Tracey Bywater
Claudine Bowyer-Crane
Pinki Sahota
Neil Small
Michaela Howell
Gill Thornton
Melanie Astin
Debbie A. Lawlor
John Wright
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3318-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue