Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Health professionals’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to providing smoking cessation advice to women in pregnancy and during the post-partum period: a systematic review of qualitative research

Authors: Kate Flemming, Hilary Graham, Dorothy McCaughan, Kathryn Angus, Lesley Sinclair, Linda Bauld

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reducing smoking in pregnancy is a policy priority in many countries and as a result there has been a rise in the development of services to help pregnant women to quit. A wide range of professionals are involved in providing these services, with midwives playing a particularly pivotal role. Understanding professionals’ experiences of providing smoking cessation support in pregnancy can help to inform the design of interventions as well as to improve routine care.

Methods

A synthesis of qualitative research of health professionals’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to providing smoking cessation advice to women in pregnancy and the post-partum period was conducted using meta-ethnography. Searches were undertaken from 1990 to January 2015 using terms for maternity health professionals and smoking cessation advisors, pregnancy, post-partum, smoking, and qualitative in seven electronic databases. The review was reported in accordance with the ‘Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research’ (ENTREQ) statement.

Results

Eight studies reported in nine papers were included, reporting on the views of 190 health professionals/key informants, including 85 midwives and health visitors. The synthesis identified that both the professional role of participants and the organisational context in which they worked could act as either barriers or facilitators to an individual’s ability to provide smoking cessation support to pregnant or post-partum women. Underpinning these factors was an acknowledgment that the association between maternal smoking and social disadvantage was a considerable barrier to addressing and supporting smoking cessation

Conclusions

The review identifies a role for professional education, both pre-qualification and in continuing professional development that will enable individuals to provide smoking cessation support to pregnant women. Key to the success of this education is recognising the centrality of the professional-client/patient relationship in any interaction. The review also highlights a widespread professional perception of the barriers associated with helping women give up smoking in pregnancy, particularly for those in disadvantaged circumstances. Improving the quality and accessibility of evidence on effective healthcare interventions, including evidence on ‘what works’ to support smoking cessation in disadvantaged groups, should therefore be a priority.

PROSPERO 2013

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Schneider S, Schütz J. Who smokes during pregnancy? A systematic literature review of population-based surveys conducted in developed countries between 1997 and 2006. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(2):138–47. doi:10.1080/13625180802027993.CrossRefPubMed Schneider S, Schütz J. Who smokes during pregnancy? A systematic literature review of population-based surveys conducted in developed countries between 1997 and 2006. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(2):138–47. doi:10.​1080/​1362518080202799​3.CrossRefPubMed
10.
12.
go back to reference Murphy K, Steyn K, Mathews C. The midwife’s role in providing smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women: The views of midwives working with high risk, disadvantaged women in public sector antenatal services in South Africa. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.004. Murphy K, Steyn K, Mathews C. The midwife’s role in providing smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women: The views of midwives working with high risk, disadvantaged women in public sector antenatal services in South Africa. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijnurstu.​2015.​08.​004.
18.
go back to reference Flemming K, McCaughan D, Angus K, Graham H. Qualitative systematic review: barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation experienced by women in pregnancy and following childbirth. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(6):1210–26. doi:10.1111/jan.12580.CrossRefPubMed Flemming K, McCaughan D, Angus K, Graham H. Qualitative systematic review: barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation experienced by women in pregnancy and following childbirth. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(6):1210–26. doi:10.​1111/​jan.​12580.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Flemming K, Graham H, McCaughan D, Angus K, Bauld L. The barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation experienced by women’s partners during pregnancy and the post-partum period: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:849. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2163-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Flemming K, Graham H, McCaughan D, Angus K, Bauld L. The barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation experienced by women’s partners during pregnancy and the post-partum period: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:849. doi:10.​1186/​s12889-015-2163-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Notley C, Blyth A, Craig J, Edwards A, Holland R. Postpartum smoking relapse – a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Addiction. 2015. doi:10.1111/add.13062. Notley C, Blyth A, Craig J, Edwards A, Holland R. Postpartum smoking relapse – a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Addiction. 2015. doi:10.​1111/​add.​13062.
21.
go back to reference Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. London: Sage Publications Inc.; 1988. Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. London: Sage Publications Inc.; 1988.
25.
go back to reference ATLAS.ti v6.2.28 [program] Berlin: ATLAS ti Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2015. ATLAS.ti v6.2.28 [program] Berlin: ATLAS ti Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2015.
27.
31.
go back to reference Aquilino ML, Goody CM, Lowe JB. WIC providers’ perspectives on offering smoking cessation interventions. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(5):326–32.CrossRefPubMed Aquilino ML, Goody CM, Lowe JB. WIC providers’ perspectives on offering smoking cessation interventions. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(5):326–32.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Herzig K, Huynh D, Gilbert P, Danley DW, Jackson R, Gerbert B. Comparing prenatal providers’ approaches to four different risks: alcohol, tobacco, drugs, and domestic violence. Women Health. 2006;43(3):83–101. doi:10.1300/J013v43n03_05.CrossRefPubMed Herzig K, Huynh D, Gilbert P, Danley DW, Jackson R, Gerbert B. Comparing prenatal providers’ approaches to four different risks: alcohol, tobacco, drugs, and domestic violence. Women Health. 2006;43(3):83–101. doi:10.​1300/​J013v43n03_​05.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson A, Hannes K, Booth A on behalf of the Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group. Qualitative research and Cochrane Reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. http://handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed 27 Feb 2015. Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson A, Hannes K, Booth A on behalf of the Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group. Qualitative research and Cochrane Reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. http://​handbook.​cochrane.​org/​. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.
38.
Metadata
Title
Health professionals’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to providing smoking cessation advice to women in pregnancy and during the post-partum period: a systematic review of qualitative research
Authors
Kate Flemming
Hilary Graham
Dorothy McCaughan
Kathryn Angus
Lesley Sinclair
Linda Bauld
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2961-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue