Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Small-area spatio-temporal analyses of participation rates in the mammography screening program in the city of Dortmund (NW Germany)

Authors: Dorothea Lemke, Shoma Berkemeyer, Volkmar Mattauch, Oliver Heidinger, Edzer Pebesma, Hans-Werner Hense

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The population-based mammography screening program (MSP) was implemented by the end of 2005 in Germany, and all women between 50 and 69 years are actively invited to a free biennial screening examination. However, despite the expected benefits, the overall participation rates range only between 50 and 55 %. There is also increasing evidence that belonging to a vulnerable population, such as ethnic minorities or low income groups, is associated with a decreased likelihood of participating in screening programs. This study aimed to analyze in more detail the intra-urban variation of MSP uptake at the neighborhood level (i.e. statistical districts) for the city of Dortmund in northwest Germany and to identify demographic and socioeconomic risk factors that contribute to non-response to screening invitations.

Methods

The numbers of participants by statistical district were aggregated over the three periods 2007/2008, 2009/2010, and 2011/2012. Participation rates were calculated as numbers of participants per female resident population averaged over each 2-year period. Bayesian hierarchical spatial models extended with a temporal and spatio-temporal interaction effect were used to analyze the participation rates applying integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA). The model included explanatory covariates taken from the atlas of social structure of Dortmund.

Results

Generally, participation rates rose for all districts over the time periods. However, participation was persistently lowest in the inner city of Dortmund. Multivariable regression analysis showed that migrant status and long-term unemployment were associated with significant increases of non-attendance in the MSP.

Conclusion

Low income groups and immigrant populations are clustered in the inner city of Dortmund and the observed spatial pattern of persistently low participation in the city center is likely linked to the underlying socioeconomic gradient. This corresponds with the findings of the ecological regression analysis manifesting socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods as risk factors for low attendance in the MSP. Spatio-temporal surveillance of participation in cancer screening programs may be used to identify spatial inequalities in screening uptake and plan spatially focused interventions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mammographie K. Evaluationsbericht 2011. Berlin: Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse des Mammographie-Screening-Programms in Deutschland; 2014. Mammographie K. Evaluationsbericht 2011. Berlin: Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse des Mammographie-Screening-Programms in Deutschland; 2014.
5.
go back to reference Merkin SS, Stevenson L, Powe N. Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):64–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Merkin SS, Stevenson L, Powe N. Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):64–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
11.
go back to reference Stadt Dortmund. Sozialstrukturatlas 2005 - Demographische und soziale Struktur der Stadt Dortmund, ihrer Stadtbezirke und Sozialräume. In: Dezernat für Arbeit GuS, editor. Dortmund; 2005. Stadt Dortmund. Sozialstrukturatlas 2005 - Demographische und soziale Struktur der Stadt Dortmund, ihrer Stadtbezirke und Sozialräume. In: Dezernat für Arbeit GuS, editor. Dortmund; 2005.
14.
go back to reference Knorr-Held L. Bayesian modelling of inseparable space-time variation in disease risk. Stat Med. 2000;19(17–18):2555–67.CrossRefPubMed Knorr-Held L. Bayesian modelling of inseparable space-time variation in disease risk. Stat Med. 2000;19(17–18):2555–67.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Besag J, York J, Mollie A. Bayesian Image-Restoration, with 2 Applications in Spatial Statistics. Ann I Stat Math. 1991;43(1):1–20.CrossRef Besag J, York J, Mollie A. Bayesian Image-Restoration, with 2 Applications in Spatial Statistics. Ann I Stat Math. 1991;43(1):1–20.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schrodle B, Held L. Spatio-temporal disease mapping using INLA. Environmetrics. 2010;22(6):725–34.CrossRef Schrodle B, Held L. Spatio-temporal disease mapping using INLA. Environmetrics. 2010;22(6):725–34.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Held L, Natario I, Fenton SE, Rue H, Becker N. Towards joint disease mapping. Stat Methods Med Res. 2005;14(1):61–82.CrossRefPubMed Held L, Natario I, Fenton SE, Rue H, Becker N. Towards joint disease mapping. Stat Methods Med Res. 2005;14(1):61–82.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
23.
go back to reference Bivand RS, Gomez-Rubio V, Rue H. Spatial Data Analysis with R-INLA with Some Extensions. J Stat Softw. 2015;63(20):1–31.CrossRef Bivand RS, Gomez-Rubio V, Rue H. Spatial Data Analysis with R-INLA with Some Extensions. J Stat Softw. 2015;63(20):1–31.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lindgren F, Rue H. Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA. J Stat Softw. 2015;63(19):1–25.CrossRef Lindgren F, Rue H. Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA. J Stat Softw. 2015;63(19):1–25.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
27.
go back to reference Dailey AB, Brumback BA, Livingston MD, Jones BA, Curbow BA, Xu X. Area-level socioeconomic position and repeat mammography screening use: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(11):2331–44. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0528.CrossRefPubMed Dailey AB, Brumback BA, Livingston MD, Jones BA, Curbow BA, Xu X. Area-level socioeconomic position and repeat mammography screening use: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(11):2331–44. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-11-0528.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Pornet C, Dejardin O, Morlais F, Bouvier V, Launoy G. Socioeconomic and healthcare supply statistical determinants of compliance to mammography screening programs: a multilevel analysis in Calvados. France Cancer epidemiology. 2010;34(3):309–15. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2010.03.010.CrossRefPubMed Pornet C, Dejardin O, Morlais F, Bouvier V, Launoy G. Socioeconomic and healthcare supply statistical determinants of compliance to mammography screening programs: a multilevel analysis in Calvados. France Cancer epidemiology. 2010;34(3):309–15. doi:10.​1016/​j.​canep.​2010.​03.​010.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Lynge E. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(2):418–23. doi:10.1002/ijc.23089.CrossRef von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, Vejborg I, Schwartz W, Lynge E. Socio-demographic determinants of participation in mammography screening. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(2):418–23. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​23089.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kothari AR, Birch S. Individual and regional determinants of mammography uptake. Can J Public Health. 2004;95(4):290–4.PubMed Kothari AR, Birch S. Individual and regional determinants of mammography uptake. Can J Public Health. 2004;95(4):290–4.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Ouédraogo S, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Amiel P, Dancourt V, Dumas A, Arveux P. Breast cancer screening programmes: Challenging the coexistence with opportunistic mammography. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97(3):410–7. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.016. Ouédraogo S, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Amiel P, Dancourt V, Dumas A, Arveux P. Breast cancer screening programmes: Challenging the coexistence with opportunistic mammography. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;97(3):410–7. doi:10.​1016/​j.​pec.​2014.​08.​016.
34.
37.
go back to reference Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Weigel S, Biesheuvel C, Heindel W, et al. The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(46):781–7. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0781.PubMedPubMedCentral Heidinger O, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Weigel S, Biesheuvel C, Heindel W, et al. The incidence of interval cancers in the German mammography screening program: results from the population-based cancer registry in North Rhine-Westphalia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(46):781–7. doi:10.​3238/​arztebl.​2012.​0781.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, van Engen RE, Broeders MJ, et al. Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(9):2067–73. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1786-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, van Engen RE, Broeders MJ, et al. Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(9):2067–73. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-010-1786-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Metadata
Title
Small-area spatio-temporal analyses of participation rates in the mammography screening program in the city of Dortmund (NW Germany)
Authors
Dorothea Lemke
Shoma Berkemeyer
Volkmar Mattauch
Oliver Heidinger
Edzer Pebesma
Hans-Werner Hense
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2520-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue