Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Texting at the light and other forms of device distraction behind the wheel

Authors: James J. Bernstein, Joseph Bernstein

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cell phones are a well-known source of distraction for drivers, and owing to the proliferation of text messaging services, web browsers and interactive apps, modern devices provide ever-increasing temptation for drivers to take their eyes off the road. Although it is probably obvious that drivers’ manual engagement of a device while their vehicles are in motion is potentially dangerous, it may not be clear that such engagement when the vehicle is at rest (an activity broadly labeled “texting at the light”) can also impose risks. For one thing, a distracted driver at rest may fail to respond quickly to sudden changes in road conditions, such as an ambulance passing through. In addition, texting at the light may decrease so-called “situational awareness” and lead to driving errors even after the device is put down. To our knowledge, the direct comparison of the rate of device usage by drivers at rest with the rate of device usage by drivers in motion has not been reported.

Methods

We collected information on 2000 passenger vehicles by roadside observation. For the first group of 1000 passenger vehicles stopped at a traffic light, device usage (“texting”, “talking”, “none”), gender of the driver, vehicle type, seatbelt usage and presence of front seat passengers were recorded. For a second set of 1000 vehicles in motion, device usage alone was noted. Statistical significance for differences in rates was assessed with the chi-square test.

Results

We found that 3 % of drivers in motion were texting and 5 % were talking. Among the stopped drivers, 14.5 % were texting and 6.3 % were talking. In the stopped-vehicle set, gender and vehicle type were not associated with significant differences in device usage, but having a front seat passenger and using seatbelts were.

Conclusions

Device usage is markedly higher among drivers temporarily at rest compared with those in motion, and the presence of a front seat passenger, who may help alleviate boredom or reprimand bad behavior, is associated with lower device usage rates among vehicles stopped at a light. These observations may help identify suitable steps to decrease distracted driving and thereby minimize traffic trauma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Eng J Med. 1997;336(7):453–8.CrossRef Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Eng J Med. 1997;336(7):453–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors. 2006;48(2):381–91.CrossRefPubMed Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Hum Factors. 2006;48(2):381–91.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference National Safety Council, National Safety Council. Research and Statistics Department. Injury facts. In. Itasca, IL: National Safety Council; 2014: volumes. National Safety Council, National Safety Council. Research and Statistics Department. Injury facts. In. Itasca, IL: National Safety Council; 2014: volumes.
4.
go back to reference Rowden PJ, Watson BC. Mobile phone use and driving: the message is just not getting through. In: Proceedings of the Australasian College of Road Safety Conference 2013. National Wine Centre of Australia, Adelaide, SA: Australasian College of Road Safety; 2013. Rowden PJ, Watson BC. Mobile phone use and driving: the message is just not getting through. In: Proceedings of the Australasian College of Road Safety Conference 2013. National Wine Centre of Australia, Adelaide, SA: Australasian College of Road Safety; 2013.
5.
go back to reference Drews FA, Yazdani H, Godfrey CN, Cooper JM, Strayer DL. Text messaging during simulated driving. Hum Factors. 2009;51(5):762–70.CrossRefPubMed Drews FA, Yazdani H, Godfrey CN, Cooper JM, Strayer DL. Text messaging during simulated driving. Hum Factors. 2009;51(5):762–70.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mouloua M, Ahern A, Quevedo A, Jaramillo D, Rinalducci E, Smither J, et al. The effects of iPod and text-messaging use on driver distraction: a bio-behavioral analysis. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:5886–8.PubMed Mouloua M, Ahern A, Quevedo A, Jaramillo D, Rinalducci E, Smither J, et al. The effects of iPod and text-messaging use on driver distraction: a bio-behavioral analysis. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:5886–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Issar NM, Kadakia RJ, Tsahakis JM, Yoneda ZT, Sethi MK, Mir HR, et al. The link between texting and motor vehicle collision frequency in the orthopaedic trauma population. J Inj Violence Res. 2013;5(2):95–100.PubMedPubMedCentral Issar NM, Kadakia RJ, Tsahakis JM, Yoneda ZT, Sethi MK, Mir HR, et al. The link between texting and motor vehicle collision frequency in the orthopaedic trauma population. J Inj Violence Res. 2013;5(2):95–100.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Strayer DL, Watson JM, Drews FA. Cognitive distraction while multitasking in the automobile. Psychol Learn Motiv Adv Res Theory. 2011;54:29.CrossRef Strayer DL, Watson JM, Drews FA. Cognitive distraction while multitasking in the automobile. Psychol Learn Motiv Adv Res Theory. 2011;54:29.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32–64.CrossRef Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32–64.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Strayer DL. Is the technology in your car driving you to distraction? In: Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences. 2015. Strayer DL. Is the technology in your car driving you to distraction? In: Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences. 2015.
11.
go back to reference Young KL, Rudin-Brown CM, Lenne MG. Look who’s talking! A roadside survey of drivers’ cell phone use. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11(6):555–60.CrossRefPubMed Young KL, Rudin-Brown CM, Lenne MG. Look who’s talking! A roadside survey of drivers’ cell phone use. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11(6):555–60.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Strayer DL, Cooper JM, Drews FA. What do drivers fail to see when conversing on a cell phone? Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2004;48(19):2213–7.CrossRef Strayer DL, Cooper JM, Drews FA. What do drivers fail to see when conversing on a cell phone? Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2004;48(19):2213–7.CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Lewis-Evans B, Rothengatter T. Task difficulty, risk, effort and comfort in a simulated driving task--Implications for Risk Allostasis Theory. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41(5):1053–63.CrossRefPubMed Lewis-Evans B, Rothengatter T. Task difficulty, risk, effort and comfort in a simulated driving task--Implications for Risk Allostasis Theory. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41(5):1053–63.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zhao N, Reimer B, Mehler B, D’Ambrosio LA, Coughlin JF. Self-reported and observed risky driving behaviors among frequent and infrequent cell phone users. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;61:71–7.CrossRefPubMed Zhao N, Reimer B, Mehler B, D’Ambrosio LA, Coughlin JF. Self-reported and observed risky driving behaviors among frequent and infrequent cell phone users. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;61:71–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Atchley P, Atwood S, Boulton A. The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: behavior may shape attitude. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43(1):134–42.CrossRefPubMed Atchley P, Atwood S, Boulton A. The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: behavior may shape attitude. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43(1):134–42.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vera-López JD, Pérez-Núñez R, Híjar M, Hidalgo-Solórzano E, Lunnen JC, Chandran A, et al. Distracted driving: mobile phone use while driving in three Mexican cities. Inj Prev. 2013;19(4):276–9.CrossRefPubMed Vera-López JD, Pérez-Núñez R, Híjar M, Hidalgo-Solórzano E, Lunnen JC, Chandran A, et al. Distracted driving: mobile phone use while driving in three Mexican cities. Inj Prev. 2013;19(4):276–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Hill L, Rybar J, Styer T, Fram E, Merchant G, Eastman A. Prevalence of and attitudes about distracted driving in college students. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(4):362–7.CrossRefPubMed Hill L, Rybar J, Styer T, Fram E, Merchant G, Eastman A. Prevalence of and attitudes about distracted driving in college students. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(4):362–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Liang Y, Lee JD. Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(3):881–90.CrossRefPubMed Liang Y, Lee JD. Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(3):881–90.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Texting at the light and other forms of device distraction behind the wheel
Authors
James J. Bernstein
Joseph Bernstein
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2343-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue