Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Subjective health complaints in adolescent victims of cyber harassment: moderation through support from parents/friends - a Swedish population-based study

Authors: Maria Fridh, Martin Lindström, Maria Rosvall

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Victimization in cyberspace has emerged as a new public health issue among the young. The main purpose of this study was to analyze associations between cyber victimization defined as cyber harassment (CH) (a somewhat broader concept than cyberbullying) and subjective health complaints (SHC), to study whether these associations were modified by parental/friend support (measured as communication), and to explore the influence of traditional bullying victimization (TBV) on the association between CH and SHC.

Methods

The study population consisted of 8544 students in 9th grade (around 15 years old) who participated in the 2012 Scania public health survey of children and adolescents. The survey was a cross-sectional total-population study conducted in school, with a response rate of 83 %.
Main and interaction (stress-buffering) effects of social support on the relationship between CH and SCH were investigated by hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses, adjusted for potential confounders, including TBV.

Results

The past-year prevalence of CH (once or several times) was 14 % among boys and 20 % among girls. Having been cyber harassed once or several times during the past year was associated with higher levels of SHC, controlling for age, parental occupation, parental origin, daily smoking, intense alcohol consumption, and disability. Among both boys and girls, the associations were stronger for CH occurring several times than for CH occurring only once. Main effects of parental/friend support were seen for both boys and girls, while stress-buffering effects were indicated for boys only. Additional analysis further adjusting for TBV did not change the associations substantially, indicating that CH has an effect of its own on SHC.

Conclusion

Intervention programs aimed at improving the quality of peer and family relationships among children and adolescents might reduce the incidence of both cyber harassment and traditional bullying and lower the prevalence of psychosomatic complaints.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Suzuki K, Asaga R, Sourander A, Hoven CW, Mandell D. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health. Int J of Adolesc Med Health. 2012;24:27–35.CrossRef
2.
Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:368–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Mishna F, Saini M, Solomon S. Ongoing and online: children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009;31:1222–8.CrossRef
4.
Chang F-C, Lee C-M, Chiu C-H, Hsi W-Y, Huang T-F, Pan Y-C. Relationships among cyberbullying, school bullying, and mental health in Taiwanese adolescents. J Sch Health. 2013;83:454–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Olweus D, Invited expert discussion paper. Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? Eur J Dev Psychol. 2012;9:520–38.CrossRef
7.
Slonje R, Smith PK, Frisén A. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29:26–32.CrossRef
8.
Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49:376–85.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Barboza GE. The association between school exclusion, delinquency and subtypes of cyber- and F2F-victimizations: Identifying and predicting risk profiles and subtypes using latent class analysis. Child Abuse Neglect. 2015;39:109–22.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Schneider SK, O’Donnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RWS. Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:171–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Salmivalli C, Sainio M, Hodges EVE. Electronic victimization: Correlates, antecedents, and consequences among elementary and middle school students. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42:442–53.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Annerbäck E-M, Sahlqvist L, Wingren G. A cross-sectional study of victimisation of bullying among schoolchildren in Sweden: Background factors and self-reported health complaints. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42:270–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Helweg-Larsen K, Schütt N, Larsen HB. Predictors and protective factors for adolescent Internet victimization: results from a 2008 nationwide Danish youth survey. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:533–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Livingstone S, Mascheroni G, Ólafsson K, Haddon L. Children’s online risks and opportunities: Comparative findings from EU kids online and Net children go mobile. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. 2014. www.​eukidsonline.​net (Accessed September 15, 2015) and http://​www.​netchildrengomob​ile.​eu (Accessed September 15, 2015).
16.
Molcho M, Craig W, Due P, Pickett W, Harel-Fisch Y, Overpeck M, et al. Cross-national time trends in bullying behaviour 1994–2006: findings from Europe and North America. Int J Public Health. 2009;54 Suppl 2:S225–34.CrossRef
17.
Due P, Holstein BE, Lynch J, Diderichsen F, Gabhain SN, Scheidt P, et al. Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15:128–32.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Sourander A, Klomek AB, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M, et al. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:720–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2013;53:S13–20.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mitchell KJ, Ybarra M, Finkelhor D. The relative importance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency and substance use. Child Maltreat. 2007;12:314–24.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Bonnano RA, Hymel S. Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. J Youth Adolescence. 2013;42:685–97.CrossRef
24.
Olenik-Shemesh D, Heiman T, Eden S. Cyberbullying victimization in adolescence: relationships with loneliness and depressive mood. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 2012;17(3–4):361–74.CrossRef
25.
Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;98(2):310–57.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Fanti KA, Demetriou AG, Hawa VV. A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2012;9:168–81.CrossRef
27.
Conners-Burrow NA, Johnson DL, Whiteside-Mansell L, McKelvey L, Gargus RA. Adults matter: Protecting children from the negative impacts of bullying. Psychology in the Schools. 2009;46(7):593–604.CrossRef
28.
Papafratzeskakou E, Jungmeen K, Longo GS, Riser DK. Peer victimization and depressive symptoms: Role of peers and parent–child relationship. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma. 2011;20:784–99.CrossRef
29.
Tanigawa D, Furlong JM, Felix ED, Sharkey JD. The protective role of perceived social support against the manifestation of depressive symptoms in peer victims. Journal of School Violence. 2011;10:393–412.CrossRef
30.
Lereya ST, Samara M, Wolke D. Parenting behaviour and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim: A meta-analysis study. Child Abuse Negl. 2013;37:1091–108.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Brolin Låftman S, Östberg V. The pros and cons of social relations: An analysis of adolescents’ health complaints. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:611–23.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Stadler C, Feifel J, Rohrman S, Vermeiren R, Poustka F. Peer-victimization and mental health problems in adolescents: Are parental and school support protective? Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2010;41:371–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Moreno C, Sánchez-Queija I, Muňoz-Tinoco V, Gaspar de Matos M, Dallago L, Bogt TT, et al. Cross-national associations between parent and peer communication and psychological complaints. Int J Public Health. 2009;54 Suppl 2:S235–42.CrossRef
34.
Molcho M, Gabhain SN, Kelleher CC. Interpersonal relationships as predictors of positive health among Irish youth: the more the merrier? Ir Med J. 2007;100:suppl 33–36.
35.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–82.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Bilsky SA, Cole DA, Dukewich TL, Martin NC, Sinclair KR, Tran CV, et al. Does supportive parenting mitigate the longitudinal effects of peer victimization on depressive thoughts and symptoms in children? J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122(2):406–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Davidson LM, Demaray MK. Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing–externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review. 2007;36(3):383–405.
38.
Rigby K. Effects of peer victimization in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. Journal of Adolescence. 2000;23:57–68.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Haugland S, Wold B. Subjective health complaints in adolescence – Reliability and validity of survey methods. Journal of Adolescence. 2001;24:611–24.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Ottova V, Erhart M, Vollebergh W, Kökönyei G, Morgan A, Gobina I, et al. The role of individual- and macro-level social determinants on young adolescents’ psychosomatic complaints. J Early Adolesc. 2012;32:126–58.CrossRef
42.
Petaniduou D, Mihas C, Dimitrakaki C, Kolaitis G, Tountas Y. Selected family characteristics are associated with adolescents’ subjective health complaints. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(2):201–6.CrossRef
43.
44.
45.
Botello-Harbaum M, Haynie DL, Murray KW, Iannotti RJ. Cigarette smoking status and recurrent subjective health complaints among US school-aged adolescents. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;37:551–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Hoel S, Eriksen BM, Breidablik H-J, Meland E. Adolescent alcohol use, psychological health, and social integration. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32:361–7.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. Br Med J. 2000;320:1240–5.CrossRef
48.
Låftman SB, Modin B, Östberg V. Cyberbullying and subjective health. A large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013;35:112–9.CrossRef
49.
50.
Machmutow K, Perren S, Sticca F, Alsaker FD. Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 2012;15(3–4):403–20.CrossRef
51.
Li CE, DiGiuseppe R, Froh J. The roles of sex, gender, and coping in adolescent depression. Adolescence. 2006;41(163):409–15.PubMed
52.
Völlink T, Bolman CAW, Eppingbroek A, Dehue F. Emotion-focused coping worsens depressive feelings and health complaints in cyberbullied children. Journal of Criminology 2013;Article ID 416976, doi.org/10.​1155/​2013/​416976
53.
Hilt LM, McLaughlin KA. Examination of the response styles theory in a community sample of young adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010;38:545–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Rueger SY, Malecki CK, Demaray MK. Stability of peer victimization in early adolescence: Effects of timing and duration. Journal of School Psychology. 2011;49:443–64.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Pouwelse M, Bolman C, Lodewijkx H. Gender differences and social support: Mediators or moderators between peer victimization and depressive feelings? Psychology in the Schools. 2011;48(8):800–14.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Subjective health complaints in adolescent victims of cyber harassment: moderation through support from parents/friends - a Swedish population-based study
Authors
Maria Fridh
Martin Lindström
Maria Rosvall
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2239-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

The objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in 2–3 year olds and their parents: a cross-sectional feasibility study in the bi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort

Research article

Evidence for the low recording of weight status and lifestyle risk factors in the Danish National Registry of Patients, 1999–2012

Research article

Retirement due to disabilities in patients with type 1 diabetes a nationwide multicenter survey in Brazil

Erratum

Erratum: Randomized controlled trial on drowning prevention for parents with children aged below five years in Bangladesh: a study protocol

Research article

Differences in diabetes prevalence and inequalities in disease management and glycaemic control by immigrant status: a population-based study (Italy)

Research article

Improving child survival through a district management strengthening and community empowerment intervention: early implementation experiences from Uganda