Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing domestic violence (I-DECIDE)

Authors: Kelsey Hegarty, Laura Tarzia, Elizabeth Murray, Jodie Valpied, Cathy Humphreys, Angela Taft, Lisa Gold, Nancy Glass

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Domestic violence is a serious problem affecting the health and wellbeing of women globally. Interventions in health care settings have primarily focused on screening and referral, however, women often may not disclose abuse to health practitioners. The internet offers a confidential space in which women can assess the health of their relationships and make a plan for safety and wellbeing for themselves and their children. This randomised controlled trial is testing the effectiveness of a web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid (I-DECIDE). Based broadly on the IRIS trial in the United States, it has been adapted for the Australian context where it is conducted entirely online and uses the Psychosocial Readiness Model as the basis for the intervention.

Methods/design

In this two arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial, women who have experienced abuse or fear of a partner in the previous 6 months will be computer randomised to receive either the I-DECIDE website or a comparator website (basic relationship and safety advice). The intervention includes self-directed reflection exercises on their relationship, danger level, priority setting, and results in an individualised, tailored action plan. Primary self-reported outcomes are: self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale) immediately after completion, 6 and 12 months post-baseline; and depressive symptoms (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Revised, 6 and 12 months post-baseline). Secondary outcomes include mean number of helpful actions for safety and wellbeing, mean level of fear of partner and cost-effectiveness.

Discussion

This fully-automated trial will evaluate a web-based self-information, self-reflection and self-management tool for domestic violence. We hypothesise that the improvement in self-efficacy and mental health will be mediated by increased perceived support and awareness encouraging positive change. If shown to be effective, I-DECIDE could be easily incorporated into the community sector and health care settings, providing an alternative to formal services for women not ready or able to acknowledge abuse and access specialised services.

Trial registration

Trial registered on 15th December 2014 with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614001306​606
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
2.
go back to reference Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002;360(9339):1083–8.CrossRefPubMed Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002;360(9339):1083–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, Rose M, Arsene C, Norman R et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technology Assessment. 2009;13 (16):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1–113, 37–347. Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, Rose M, Arsene C, Norman R et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technology Assessment. 2009;13 (16):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1–113, 37–347.
4.
go back to reference Ramsay J, Feder G, Rivas C. Interventions to reduce violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience partner abuse: a systematic review. London: UK Department of Health; 2006. Ramsay J, Feder G, Rivas C. Interventions to reduce violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience partner abuse: a systematic review. London: UK Department of Health; 2006.
5.
go back to reference WHO. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women - WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2013. WHO. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women - WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Taft A, O'Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson L, & Feder G. (2013). Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Apr 30;4:CD007007. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005043.pub2. Taft A, O'Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson L, & Feder G. (2013). Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Apr 30;4:CD007007. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD005043.​pub2.
7.
go back to reference Ramsay J, Carter Y, Davidson L, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Feder G et al. Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; Issue 3. Art. No.:CD005043. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005043.pub2. Ramsay J, Carter Y, Davidson L, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Feder G et al. Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; Issue 3. Art. No.:CD005043. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD005043.​pub2.
8.
go back to reference Garcia-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d'Oliveira A, Koziol-McLean J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2014;385(9977):1567–79.CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d'Oliveira A, Koziol-McLean J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2014;385(9977):1567–79.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cluss PA, Chang JC, Hawker L, Scholle SH, Dado D, Buranosky R, et al. The process of change for victims of intimate partner violence: support for a psychosocial readiness model. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16(5):262–74.CrossRefPubMed Cluss PA, Chang JC, Hawker L, Scholle SH, Dado D, Buranosky R, et al. The process of change for victims of intimate partner violence: support for a psychosocial readiness model. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16(5):262–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chang JC, Dado D, Hawker L, Cluss PA, Buranosky R, Slagel L, et al. Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: factors and circumstances leading women victims toward change. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(2):251–9. doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1568.CrossRef Chang JC, Dado D, Hawker L, Cluss PA, Buranosky R, Slagel L, et al. Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: factors and circumstances leading women victims toward change. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(2):251–9. doi:10.​1089/​jwh.​2009.​1568.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hegarty K, O'Doherty L, Taft A, Chondros P, Brown S, Valpied J, et al. Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):249–58.CrossRefPubMed Hegarty K, O'Doherty L, Taft A, Chondros P, Brown S, Valpied J, et al. Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):249–58.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference O'Doherty L, Taft A, McNair R, Hegarty K. Fractured Identity in the Context of Intimate Partner Violence: Barriers and Opportunities to Seeking Help in Health Settings. Violence Against Women. In Press. O'Doherty L, Taft A, McNair R, Hegarty K. Fractured Identity in the Context of Intimate Partner Violence: Barriers and Opportunities to Seeking Help in Health Settings. Violence Against Women. In Press.
13.
go back to reference Feder G, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket A. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):22–37.CrossRefPubMed Feder G, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket A. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):22–37.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dienemann J, Glass N, Hyman R. Survivor preferences for response to IPV disclosure. Clin Nurs Res. 2005;14(3):234–7.CrossRef Dienemann J, Glass N, Hyman R. Survivor preferences for response to IPV disclosure. Clin Nurs Res. 2005;14(3):234–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gerbert B, Moe J, Caspers N, Salber P, Feldman ME, Herzig K, et al. Physicians' response to victims of domestic violence: Toward a model of care. Women Health. 2002;35(2/3):1–22.CrossRefPubMed Gerbert B, Moe J, Caspers N, Salber P, Feldman ME, Herzig K, et al. Physicians' response to victims of domestic violence: Toward a model of care. Women Health. 2002;35(2/3):1–22.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Campbell JC. Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with battered women. Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8(4):36–51.CrossRef Campbell JC. Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with battered women. Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8(4):36–51.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Berger M, Wagner T, Baker L. Internet use and stigmatized illness. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(8):1821–7.CrossRefPubMed Berger M, Wagner T, Baker L. Internet use and stigmatized illness. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(8):1821–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Alvarez-Jimenez M, Alcazar-Corcoles MA, BGonzalez-Blanch C, Bendall S, McGorry PD, Gleeson JF. Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: A systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophr Res. 2014;156:96–106.CrossRefPubMed Alvarez-Jimenez M, Alcazar-Corcoles MA, BGonzalez-Blanch C, Bendall S, McGorry PD, Gleeson JF. Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: A systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophr Res. 2014;156:96–106.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Glass N, Eden KB, Bloom T, Perrin N. Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(11):1947–64.CrossRefPubMed Glass N, Eden KB, Bloom T, Perrin N. Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(11):1947–64.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Dutton M. Empowering and healing the battered woman. New York: Springer; 1992. Dutton M. Empowering and healing the battered woman. New York: Springer; 1992.
21.
go back to reference Koziol-McLain J, Vandal AC, Nada-Raja S, Wilson D, Glass N, Eden KB, et al. A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koziol-McLain J, Vandal AC, Nada-Raja S, Wilson D, Glass N, Eden KB, et al. A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Hegarty K, O'Doherty L, Gunn J, Pierce D, Taft A. A brief counseling intervention by health professionals utilising the 'readiness to change' concept for women experiencing intimate partner abuse: The weave project. J Fam Stud. 2008;14(2–3):376–88.CrossRef Hegarty K, O'Doherty L, Gunn J, Pierce D, Taft A. A brief counseling intervention by health professionals utilising the 'readiness to change' concept for women experiencing intimate partner abuse: The weave project. J Fam Stud. 2008;14(2–3):376–88.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Eysenbach G. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4), e126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eysenbach G. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4), e126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Eden KB, Perrin NA, Hanson GC, Messing JT, Bloom TL, Campbell J, et al. Use of online safety decision aid by abused women. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(4):372–83.CrossRefPubMed Eden KB, Perrin NA, Hanson GC, Messing JT, Bloom TL, Campbell J, et al. Use of online safety decision aid by abused women. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(4):372–83.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Reisenhofer S, Taft A. Women's journey to safety - the transtheoretical model in clinical practice when working with women experiencing intimate partner violence: a scientific review and clinical guidance. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(3):536–48.CrossRefPubMed Reisenhofer S, Taft A. Women's journey to safety - the transtheoretical model in clinical practice when working with women experiencing intimate partner violence: a scientific review and clinical guidance. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(3):536–48.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hegarty K, Bush R, Sheehan M. The composite abuse scale: further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings. Violence Vict. 2005;20(5):529–47.CrossRefPubMed Hegarty K, Bush R, Sheehan M. The composite abuse scale: further development and assessment of reliability and validity of a multidimensional partner abuse measure in clinical settings. Violence Vict. 2005;20(5):529–47.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference McFarlane J, Malecha A, Gist J, Watson K, Batten E, Hall I, et al. Increasing the safety-promoting behaviors of abused women. Am J Nurs. 2004;104(3):40–50.CrossRefPubMed McFarlane J, Malecha A, Gist J, Watson K, Batten E, Hall I, et al. Increasing the safety-promoting behaviors of abused women. Am J Nurs. 2004;104(3):40–50.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mynors-Wallis LM, Gath DH, Day A, Baker F. Randomised controlled trial of problem solving treatment, antidepressant medication, and combined treatment for major depression in primary care. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):26–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mynors-Wallis LM, Gath DH, Day A, Baker F. Randomised controlled trial of problem solving treatment, antidepressant medication, and combined treatment for major depression in primary care. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):26–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Watson J, Crosby H, Dale V, Tober G, Wu Q, Lang J, et al. AESOPS: a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening and stepped care interventions for older hazardous alcohol users in primary care. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(25):1–158.CrossRef Watson J, Crosby H, Dale V, Tober G, Wu Q, Lang J, et al. AESOPS: a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening and stepped care interventions for older hazardous alcohol users in primary care. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(25):1–158.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lock J. The development of the Consequences of Screening Tool and the psychometric assessment of three woman abuse measures [thesis]. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2008. Lock J. The development of the Consequences of Screening Tool and the psychometric assessment of three woman abuse measures [thesis]. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University; 2008.
31.
go back to reference Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2010. Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2010.
32.
go back to reference Gardner W, Mulvey EP, Shaw EC. Regression analyses of counts and rates: poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin. 1995;118:392–404.CrossRefPubMed Gardner W, Mulvey EP, Shaw EC. Regression analyses of counts and rates: poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin. 1995;118:392–404.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference National Research Council. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010. National Research Council. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
34.
go back to reference Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnson M, editors. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson; 1995. p. 35–7. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnson M, editors. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson; 1995. p. 35–7.
35.
go back to reference Eaton W, Muntaner C, Smith C, Tien A, Ybarra M. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In: Maruish M, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2004. p. 363–77. Eaton W, Muntaner C, Smith C, Tien A, Ybarra M. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In: Maruish M, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2004. p. 363–77.
36.
go back to reference Gunn J, Gilchrist GP, Chondros P, Ramp M, Hegarty K, Blashki G, et al. Who is identified when screening for depression is undertaken in general practice? baseline findings from the diagnosis, management and outcomes of depression in primary care (diamond) longitudinal study. Med J Aust. 2008;188(12 Suppl):S119–25.PubMed Gunn J, Gilchrist GP, Chondros P, Ramp M, Hegarty K, Blashki G, et al. Who is identified when screening for depression is undertaken in general practice? baseline findings from the diagnosis, management and outcomes of depression in primary care (diamond) longitudinal study. Med J Aust. 2008;188(12 Suppl):S119–25.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Biener L, Abrams DB. The contemplation ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):360–5.CrossRefPubMed Biener L, Abrams DB. The contemplation ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1991;10(5):360–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing domestic violence (I-DECIDE)
Authors
Kelsey Hegarty
Laura Tarzia
Elizabeth Murray
Jodie Valpied
Cathy Humphreys
Angela Taft
Lisa Gold
Nancy Glass
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2072-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue