Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Beyond resistance: social factors in the general public response to pandemic influenza

Authors: Mark D M Davis, Niamh Stephenson, Davina Lohm, Emily Waller, Paul Flowers

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Influencing the general public response to pandemics is a public health priority. There is a prevailing view, however, that the general public is resistant to communications on pandemic influenza and that behavioural responses to the 2009/10 H1N1 pandemic were not sufficient. Using qualitative methods, this paper investigates how members of the general public respond to pandemic influenza and the hygiene, social isolation and other measures proposed by public health. Going beyond the commonly deployed notion that the general public is resistant to public health communications, this paper examines how health individualism, gender and real world constraints enable and limit individual action.

Methods

In-depth interviews (n = 57) and focus groups (ten focus groups; 59 individuals) were conducted with community samples in Melbourne, Sydney and Glasgow. Participants were selected according to maximum variation sampling using purposive criteria, including: 1) pregnancy in 2009/2010; 2) chronic illness; 3) aged 70 years and over; 4) no disclosed health problems. Verbatim transcripts were subjected to inductive, thematic analysis.

Results

Respondents did not express resistance to public health communications, but gave insight into how they interpreted and implemented guidance. An individualistic approach to pandemic risk predominated. The uptake of hygiene, social isolation and vaccine strategies was constrained by seeing oneself ‘at risk’ but not ‘a risk’ to others. Gender norms shape how members of the general public enact hygiene and social isolation. Other challenges pertained to over-reliance on perceived remoteness from risk, expectation of recovery from infection and practical constraints on the uptake of vaccination.

Conclusions

Overall, respondents were engaged with public health advice regarding pandemic influenza, indicating that the idea of public resistance has limited explanatory power. Public communications are endorsed, but challenges persist. Individualistic approaches to pandemic risk inhibit acting for the benefit of others and may deepen divisions in the community according to health status. Public communications on pandemics are mediated by gender norms that may overburden women and limit the action of men. Social research on the public response to pandemics needs to focus on the social structures and real world settings and relationships that shape the action of individuals.
Literature
1.
2.
Editorial. Antibiotic resistance: long-term solutions require action now. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(12):995.CrossRef
3.
World Health Organization. The world health report 2007: a safer future: global public health security in the 21st century. 2007.
4.
5.
6.
Ferguson N, Cummings D, Cauchemez S, Fraser C, Riley S, Meeyai A, et al. Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature. 2005;437:209–14.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Barrelet C, Bourrier M, Burton-Jeangros C, Schindler M. Unresolved issues in risk communication research: the case of the H1N1 pandemic (2009–2011). Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2013;7(s2):114–9.CrossRef
8.
Hine D. The 2009 Influenza Pandemic: an independent review of the UK response to the 2009 influenza pandemic. London: In. Edited by Office C; 2010.
9.
World Health Organization. Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005). Report of the Review Committee on the Functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) in relation to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Report by the Director-General. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.
10.
11.
Rubin G, Amlot R, Page L, Wessely S. Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey. Br Med J. 2009;339:b2651.CrossRef
12.
Rubin GJ, Potts HWW, Michie S. The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A HINIv) on public responses to the outbreak: results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(34):183–266.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Seale H, McLaws M, Heywood M, Ward K, Lowbridge C, Van D, et al. The community’s attitude towards swine flu and pandemic influenza. MJA. 2009;191(5):267–9.PubMed
14.
Seale H, Heywood A, McLaws M, Ward K, Lowbridge C, Van D, et al. Why do I need it? I am not at risk! Public perceptions towards the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Van D, McLaws M, Crimmins J, MacIntyre R, Seale H. University life and pandemic influenza: Attitudes and intended behaviour of staff and students towards pandemic (H1N1) 2009. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Lin L, Savoia E, Agboola F, Viswanath K. What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pandemic: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):484.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Abraham T. Lessons from the pandemic: the need for new tools for risk and outbreak communication. Emerg Health Threats J. 2011;4:7160.PubMed
18.
Gerwin L. The challenge of providing the public with actionable information during a pandemic. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40(3):630–54.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Holland K, Blood W. Public responses and reflexivity during the Swine flu pandemic in Australia. J Stud. 2012. iFirst: doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.744552.
21.
Joffe H. Public apprehension of emerging infectious diseases: are changes afoot? Public Underst Sci. 2011;20(4):446–60.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Teasdale E, Yardley L. Understanding responses to government health recommendations: public perceptions of government advice for managing the H1N1 (swine flu) influenza pandemic. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85:413–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Davis M, Flowers P, Lohm D, Waller E, Stephenson N. Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: Public and individual responses to the threat to life. Body Soc. March 13, 2015; doi: 1357034X14556155
24.
Briggs C, Nichter M. Biocommunicability and the biopolitics of pandemic threats. Med Anthropol. 2009;28(3):189–98.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E. Individualisation: institutionalised individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage; 2002.
26.
Petersen A, Davis M, Fraser S, Lindsay J. Healthy living and citizenship: an overview. Crit Public Health. 2010;20(4):391–400.CrossRef
27.
Davis M, Flowers P, Stephenson N. ‘We had to do what we thought was right at the time’: retrospective discourse on the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the UK. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(3):369–82.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Waller E, Davis M, Stephenson N. Australia’s pandemic influenza ‘Protect’ phase: Emerging out of the fog of pandemic. Crit Public Health. Published online 16 June 2014; doi: 10.1080/09581596.2014.926310.
29.
Davis M, Stephenson N, Flowers P. Compliant, complacent or panicked? Investigating the problematisation of the Australian general public in pandemic influenza control. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):912–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Davis M, Flowers P, Lohm D, Waller E, Stephenson N. “We became sceptics”: fear and media hype in general public narrative on the advent of pandemic influenza. Sociol Inq. 2014;84(3):499–518.
31.
Flowers P, Davis M, Lohm D, Waller E, Stephenson N. Understanding pandemic influenza behaviour: an exploratory biopsychosocial study. J Health Psychol. doi:101177/1359105314537542 Published online 23 June 2014.
32.
Lohm D, Flowers P, Stephenson N, Waller E, Davis M. Biography, pandemic time and risk: pregnant women reflecting on their experiences of the 2009 influenza pandemic. Health (London). 2014;18(5):493–508.CrossRef
33.
Stephenson N, Davis M, Flowers P, Waller E, MacGregor C. Mobilising “vulnerability” in the public health response to pandemic influenza. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:10–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Kelly H, Mercer G, Fielding J, Dowse G, Glass K, Carcione D, et al. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza community transmission was established in one Australian state when the virus was first identified in North America. PLoS One. 2011;5:6.
35.
Marshall C, Kelso A, McBryde E, Barr I, Eisen D, Sasadeusz J, et al. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 risk for frontline health care workers. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(6):1000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
37.
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Review of Australia’s Health Sector Response to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009: lessons identified. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011. p. 98.
38.
39.
Flyvbjerg B. Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.CrossRef
40.
Seymour-Smith S, Wetherell M, Phoenix A. ‘My wife ordered me to come!’: a discursive analysis of doctors’ and nurses’ accounts of men’s use of general practitioners. J Health Psychol. 2002;7(3):253–67.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Rogers R. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol. 1975;91(1):93–114.CrossRef
42.
Wald P. Contagious: cultures, carriers, and the outbreak narrative. Durham: Duke University Press; 2008.
43.
44.
Cedraschi C, Saya L, Klein P, Bordet MF, Carrat F. Representations of influenza and influenza-like illness in the community--a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2009 adult vaccination survey: summary results. Cat. no. PHE 135. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
46.
Poland G. The 2009–2010 influenza pandemic: effects on pandemic and seasonal vaccine uptake and lessons learned for seasonal vaccination campaigns. Vaccine. 2010;28(Supplement 4):D3–13.CrossRefPubMed
47.
48.
Metadata
Title
Beyond resistance: social factors in the general public response to pandemic influenza
Authors
Mark D M Davis
Niamh Stephenson
Davina Lohm
Emily Waller
Paul Flowers
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1756-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

HAART, DOTS and renal disease of patients co-infected with HIV/AIDS and TB in the South West Region of Cameroon

Research article

Adolescent body weight and health-related quality of life rated by adolescents and parents: the issue of measurement bias

Research article

A gloomy picture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment

Research article

School-based intervention on healthy behaviour among Ecuadorian adolescents: effect of a cluster-randomized controlled trial on screen-time

Research article

The influence of social capital on employers’ use of occupational health services: a qualitative study

Study protocol

GrOup based physical Activity for oLder adults (GOAL) randomized controlled trial: study protocol