Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Investigating the effect of a 3-month workplace-based pedometer-driven walking programme on health-related quality of life in meat processing workers: a feasibility study within a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Suliman Mansi, Stephan Milosavljevic, Steve Tumilty, Paul Hendrick, Chris Higgs, David G Baxter

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In New Zealand, meat processing populations face many health problems as a result of the nature of work in meat processing industries. The primary aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of using a pedometer-based intervention to increase physical activity and improve health-related outcomes in a population of meat processing workers.

Methods

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. A convenience sample of meat workers (n = 58; mean age 41.0 years; range: 18-65) participated in the trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups. Intervention participants (n = 29) utilized a pedometer to self monitor their activity, whilst undertaking a brief intervention, and educational material. Control participants (n = 29) received educational material only. The primary outcomes of ambulatory activity, and health-related quality of life, were evaluated at baseline, immediately following the 12-week intervention and three months post-intervention.

Results

Fifty three participants completed the program (91.3% adherence). Adherence with the intervention group was high, 93% (n = 27/29), and this group increased their mean daily step count from 5993 to 9792 steps per day, while the control group steps changed from 5788 to 6551 steps per day from baseline. This increase in step counts remained significant within the intervention group p < 0.005; at three months post-intervention representing a 59% increase over baseline scores. There were significant group changes with large effect sizes for step count change (d = 1.94) and self-reported physical activity (p < 0.005; d = 2.59) at 12 weeks intervention. Further, results showed non-significant between-group differences in physical component (PCS) and mental component (MCS) scores (PCS: p = 0.44; MGD = 0.99, 95% CI, -1.6 to 3.6; ES = 0.14, and MCS: p = 0.90, MGD = 0.15; 95% CI, -2.3 to 2.6, ES = 0.022) at 12 weeks intervention.

Conclusions

This research provides important information for a larger (RCT) in the future: results demonstrated that a pedometer-driven walking intervention in combination with goal setting, and self-monitoring supported by weekly e-mails are feasible and potentially effective in increasing step count within the workplace setting over the short term.

Trial registration number

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12613000087​752.
Literature
1.
Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson G. Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Rossi A, Dikareva A, Bacon SL, Daskalopoulou SS. The impact of physical activity on mortality in patients with high blood pressure: A systematic review. J Hypertens. 2012;30(7):1277–88.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Li J, Siegrist J. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease-a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(2):391–407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Katzmarzyk PT, Lear SA. Physical activity for obese individuals: A systematic review of effects on chronic disease risk factors. Obes Rev. 2012;13(2):95–105.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
9.
Puig-Ribera A, McKenna J, Gilson N, Brown WJ. Change in work day step counts, wellbeing and job performance in Catalan university employees: a randomised controlled trial. Promotion Educ. 2008;15(4):11–6.CrossRef
10.
Marshall A. Challenges and opportunities for promoting physical activity in the workplace. J Sci Med Sport. 2004;7(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Tudor-Locke C, Leonardi C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. Time spent in physical activity and sedentary behaviors on the working day: The American Time Use Survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(12):1382–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Schofield G, Badlands H, Oliver M. Objectively-measured physical activity in New Zealand workers. J Sci Med Sport. 2005;8(2):143–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Ivanov Z, Ivanov M. Obesity, hypertension and the lumbar syndrome in workers at the Neoplanta Meat Plant in Novi Sad. [Gojaznost, hipertenzija i lumbalni sindrom radnika ad “Neoplanta” industrija mesa Novi Sad]. Med Pregl. 2000;53(5-6):297–300.PubMed
15.
McLean D, Cheng S, T Mannetje A, Woodward A, Pearce N. Mortality and cancer incidence in New Zealand meat workers. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(6):541–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Dishman RK, Oldenburg B, O’Neal H, Shephard RJ. Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15(4):344–61.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Christie J, O’Halloran P, Caan W, Cardwell CR, Young T, Rao M. Workplace‐based organisational interventions to prevent and control obesity by improving dietary intake and/or increasing physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; Issue 6. [doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008546].
18.
Malik SH, Blake H, Suggs LS. A systematic review of workplace health promotion interventions for increasing physical activity. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;19(1):149–80.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Odeen M, Magnussen LH, Maeland S, Larun L, Eriksen HR, Tveito TH. Systematic review of active workplace interventions to reduce sickness absence. Occup Med (Lond). 2013;63(1):7–16.CrossRef
20.
Dugdill L, Brettle A, Hulme C, McCluskey S, Long A. Workplace physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2008;1(1):20–40.CrossRef
21.
Freak-Poli RL, Cumpston M, Peeters A, Clemes SA. Workplace pedometer interventions for increasing physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;30:4.
22.
Proper KI, Koning M, Van der Beek AJ, Hildebrandt VH, Bosscher RJ, Van Mechelen W. The effectiveness of worksite physical activity programs on physical activity, physical fitness, and health. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13(2):106–17.CrossRefPubMed
23.
To QG, Chen TTL, Magnussen CG, To KG. Workplace physical activity interventions: A systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27(6):113–23.CrossRef
24.
Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: A systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(19):2296–304.CrossRef
25.
Houle J, Doyon O, Vadeboncoeur N, Turbide G, Diaz A, Poirier P. Effectiveness of a pedometer-based program using a socio-cognitive intervention on physical activity and quality of life in a setting of cardiac rehabilitation. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(1):27–32.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self‐efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta‐analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(2):265–88.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Baker G, Mutrie N, Lowry R. Using pedometers as motivational tools: Are goals set in steps more effective than goals set in minutes for increasing walking? Int J Health Promot Educ. 2008;46(1):21–6.CrossRef
28.
Freak-Poli R, Wolfe R, Backholer K, de Courten M, Peeters A. Impact of a pedometer-based workplace health program on cardiovascular and diabetes risk profile. Prev Med. 2011;53(3):162–71.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Haines DJ, Davis L, Rancour P, Robinson M, Neel-Wilson T, Wagner S. A pilot intervention to promote walking and wellness and to improve the health of college faculty and staff. J Am Coll Heal. 2007;55(4):219–25.CrossRef
30.
Faghri PD, Omokaro C, Parker C, Nichols E, Gustavesen S, Blozie E. E-technology and pedometer walking program to increase physical activity at work. J Prim Prev. 2008;29(1):73–91.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Croteau KA. Strategies used to increase lifestyle physical activity in a pedometer-based intervention. J Allied Health. 2004;33(4):278–81.PubMed
32.
Mansi S, Milosavljevic S, Tumilty S, Hendrick P, Baxter GD. Use of pedometer-driven walking to promote physical activity and improve health-related quality of life among meat processing workers: a feasibility trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. Consort 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28–55.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L, Reis JP, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Wilson DK. How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Prev Med. 2005;40(3):293–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Tudor-Locke C, Ham SA, Macera CA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Reis JP, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of pedometer-determined physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(9):1567–73.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Berlin JE, Storti KL, Brach JS. Using activity monitors to measure physical activity in free-living conditions. Phys Ther. 2006;86(8):1137–45.PubMed
37.
Clemes SA, Griffiths PL. How Many Days of Pedometer Monitoring Predict Monthly Ambulatory Activity in Adults? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(9):1589–95.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Kubota A, Nagata J, Sugiyama M, Ishiduka K, Unno Y. How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in Japanese adults? [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi]. Jpn J Public Health. 2009;56(11):805–10.
39.
McDonough S, Tully M, O’Connor S, Boyd A, Kerr D, O’Neill S, et al. The Back 2 Activity Trial: education and advice versus education and advice plus a structured walking programme for chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:R163.CrossRef
40.
Baumeister RF, Gailliot M, DeWall CN, Oaten M. Self-regulation and personality: how interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. J Pers. 2006;74(6):1773–801.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports. 2007;39(8):1423–34.
42.
Tudor-Locke C, Bassett Jr DR. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Vincent SD, Sidman CL. Determining measurement error in digital pedometers. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2003;7(1):19–24.CrossRef
44.
Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Bassett Jr DR. Pedometer Measures of Free-Living Physical Activity: Comparison of 13 Models. Med Sci Sports. 2004;36(2):331–5.
45.
Grant PM, Dall PM, Mitchell SL, Granat MH. Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2008;16(2):201–14.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Le Masurier GC, Tudor-locke C. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. Med Sci Sports. 2003;35(5):867–71.
47.
Kang M, Bassett DR, Barreira TV, Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE. Measurement effects of seasonal and monthly variability on pedometer-determined data. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(3):336–43.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports. 2003;35(8):1381–95.
49.
Lee P, Macfarlane D, Lam TH, Stewart S. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):1–11.CrossRef
50.
Papathanasiou G, Georgoudis G, Papandreou M, Spyropoulos P, Georgakopoulos D, Kalfakakou V, et al. Reliability measures of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in Greek young adults. Hell J Cardiol. 2009;50(4):283–94.
51.
Van Der Ploeg HP, Tudor-Locke C, Marshall AL, Craig C, Hagströmer M, Sjöström M, et al. Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire for assessing walking. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(1):97–101.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Hasegawa T, Suzukamo Y, Akizawa T, Fukuhara S. Validation of the Japanese SF-36 v2 acute form in patients with chronic kidney disease. Jpn J Nephrol. 2008;50(1):42–50.
53.
McHorney CA, Ware Jr JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–63.CrossRefPubMed
54.
55.
McHorney CA, Ware Jr JE, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1992;30(5 Suppl):253–65.
56.
Scott KM, Tobias MI, Sarfati D, Haslett SJ. SF-36 health survey reliability, validity and norms for New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23(4):401–6.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Hill K, Wickerson LM, Woon LJ, Abady AH, Overend TJ, Goldstein RS, et al. The 6-min walk test: Responses in healthy Canadians aged 45 to 85 years. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36(5):643–9.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Soares MR, Pereira CAC. Six-minute walk test: Reference values for healthy adults in Brazil. Teste de caminhada de seis minutes valores de referência para adultos saudáveis no Brasil. 2011;37(5):576–83.
59.
American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;1(166):111–7.
60.
Alameri HF, Sanai FM, Al Dukhayil M, Azzam NA, Al-Swat KA, Hersi AS, et al. Six minute walk test to assess functional capacity in chronic liver disease patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(29):3996–4001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Ulbricht L, Neves EB, Ripka WL, Romaneli EFR. Comparison between body fat measurements obtained by portable ultrasound and caliper in young adults. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE. San Diego, CA: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS; 2012. p. 1952–5.CrossRef
62.
Goacher PJ, Lambert R, Moffatt PG. Can weight-related health risk be more accurately assessed by BMI, or by gender specific calculations of Percentage Body Fatness? Med Hypotheses. 2012;79(5):656–62.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Durnin JV, Rahaman MM. The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness. Br J Nutr. 1967;21(3):681–9.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron MX3 Plus oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the European Society of Hypertension international protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2005;10(3):165–8.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Collins CE, Warren JM, Callister R. The SHED-IT randomized controlled trial: Evaluation of an internet-based weight-loss program for men. Obesity. 2009;17(11):2025–32.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciencies; 2nd edition. United States of American, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
67.
Bubbar VK, Kreder HJ. The intention-to-treat principle: a primer for the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88(9):2097–9.PubMed
68.
Gilson N, McKenna J, Cooke C, Brown W. Walking towards health in a university community: a feasibility study. Prev Med. 2007;44(2):167–9.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Loughren E, Duda J, Fox K. Step by Step: the feasibility of a 16-Week Workplace Lunchtime Walking Intervention for Physically Inactive Employees. J Phys Act Health. 2013. [Epub ahead of print].
70.
Dishman RK, DeJoy DM, Wilson MG, Vandenberg RJ. Move to improve: A randomized workplace trial to increase physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(2):133–41.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Maruyama C, Kimura M, Okumura H, Hayashi K, Arao T. Effect of a worksite-based intervention program on metabolic parameters in middle-aged male white-collar workers: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2010;51(1):11–7.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Aittasalo M, Rinne M, Pasanen M, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Vasankari T. Promoting walking among office employees―evaluation of a randomized controlled intervention with pedometers and e-mail messages. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Shaw R, Fenwick E, Baker G, McAdam C, Fitzsimons C, Mutrie N. ‘Pedometers cost buttons’: the feasibility of implementing a pedometer based walking programme within the community. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
74.
Zoellner J, Powers A, Avis-Williams A, Ndirangu M, Strickland E, Yadrick K. Compliance and acceptability of maintaining a 6-month pedometer diary in a rural, African American community-based walking intervention. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(4):475–82.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Allen K, Morey MC. Physical activity and adherence. In: Bosworth H, editor. Improving Patient Treatment Adherence; A Clinician’s Guide. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 38.
76.
Lauzon N, Chan CB, Myers AM, Tudor-Locke C. Participant experiences in a workplace pedometer-based physical activity program. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(5):675–87.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Chan CB, Ryan DA, Tudor-Locke C. Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workers. Prev Med. 2004;39(6):1215–22.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Thomas L, Williams M. Promoting physical activity in the workplace: using pedometers to increase daily activity levels. Health Promot J Austr. 2006;17(2):97–102.PubMed
79.
Ogilvie D, Foster C, Rothnie H, Cavill N, Hamilton V, Fitzsimons C, et al. Interventions to promote walking: Systematic review. BMJ. 2007;334(7605):1204–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Rooney B, Smalley K, Larson J, Havens S. Is knowing enough? Increasing physical activity by wearing a pedometer. Wis Med J. 2003;102(4):31–6.
81.
Shaw G, Alfonso H, Howat P, Corben K. Use of pedometers in a workplace physical activity program. Australasian J Podiatr Med. 2007;41:23–8.
82.
LeCheminant JD, Smith JD, Covington NK, Hardin-Renschen T, Heden T. Pedometer use in university freshmen: a randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Health Behav. 2011;35(6):777–84.CrossRefPubMed
83.
De Cocker KA, De Bourdeaudhuij IM, Cardon GM. The effect of a multi-strategy workplace physical activity intervention promoting pedometer use and step count increase. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(4):608–19.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Brown WJ, Clemes SA, De Cocker K, Giles-Corti B, et al. How many steps/day are enough? for adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(8):79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
85.
De Cocker KA, De Bourdeaudhuij IM, Brown WJ, Cardon GM. Effects of “10,000 steps Ghent”: a whole-community intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(6):455–63.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Chan CB, Tudor-Locke C. Real-world evaluation of a community-based pedometer intervention. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(5):648.CrossRefPubMed
87.
Harding J, Freak-Poli RLA, Backholer K, Peeters A. Change in health-related quality of life amongst participants in a 4-month pedometer-based workplace health program. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10(4):533–43.CrossRefPubMed
88.
Bize R, Johnson JA, Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45(6):401–15.CrossRefPubMed
89.
Fritschi JO, Brown WJ, Laukkanen R, van Uffelen JGZ. The effects of pole walking on health in adults: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(5):70–8.CrossRef
90.
Pucci GCMF, Rech CR, Fermino RC, Reis RS. Association between physical activity and quality of life in adults. Rev Saude Publica. 2012;46(1):166–79.CrossRefPubMed
91.
92.
93.
Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Plotnikoff RC, Cook AT, Berthon B, Mitchell S, et al. Efficacy of a workplace-based weight loss program for overweight male shift workers: The Workplace POWER (Preventing Obesity Without Eating like a Rabbit) randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2011;52(5):317–25.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Investigating the effect of a 3-month workplace-based pedometer-driven walking programme on health-related quality of life in meat processing workers: a feasibility study within a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Suliman Mansi
Stephan Milosavljevic
Steve Tumilty
Paul Hendrick
Chris Higgs
David G Baxter
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1736-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

A gloomy picture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment

Research article

The aetiology of community associated pneumonia in children in Nanjing, China and aetiological patterns associated with age and season

Research article

Factors associated with nutritional status of infants and young children in Somali Region, Ethiopia: a cross- sectional study

Research article

From disease to desire, pleasure to the pill: A qualitative study of adolescent learning about sexual health and sexuality in Chile

Research article

Sociodemographic and health-(care-)related characteristics of online health information seekers: a cross-sectional German study

Research article

Prevalence, awareness, medication, control, and risk factors associated with hypertension in Yi ethnic group aged 50 years and over in rural China: the Yunnan minority eye study