Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Proposing a framework for Health Impact Assessment in Iran

Authors: Ali Fakhri, Patrick Harris, Mohammadreza Maleki

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health impact assessments (HIA) of policies and projects are conducted differently in different contexts although there has been less HIA research to date in non-western countries. Global HIA research has however suggested that the technical conduct of HIAs is tied to broader conditions and influences to do with decision making and policy development.
This study was conducted to develop a conceptual framework for progressing HIA in Iran including all factors influencing HIA planning and practice.

Methods

A comprehensive review of the international HIA literature identified core characteristics and principles. Then key informant interviews (n = 14) identified Iranian perspectives about factors influencing HIAs practice. These two stages resulted in a conceptual framework for HIA planning and practice including influencing factors and HIA content that was confirmed by our participants using e-Delphi technique.

Results

91 HIA characteristics were organized into 20 categories. The interviews showed that four core concepts i.e. context, actors, HIA principles and policies and HIA capacities influence HIA practice in Iran. Comprehensive content of HIA considering all health dimensions and health determinants, assessing health inequalities, appropriate HIA type, quantification and participation is formed under influence of the above mentioned four factors. The study also demonstrated need to redefine the HIA principles and make decision about integration of HIA in Environmental Impact Assessment and also about the level of HIA before implementing HIA. The e-Delphi resulted in expert consensus on the variables, concepts, and their relations in proposed framework.

Conclusions

Progressing HIA practice in Iran is perceived locally as subject to similar contextual conditions to those identified in the international literature. Further we have demonstrated the utility of mixed methods to progress HIA implementation in differing country contexts.
Literature
1.
Commision of Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
2.
WHO. Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health. Rio de Janeiro: World Health Organization; 2011.
3.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Sub-Systems. 3rd ed. Canada: Oxford University Press; 2009.
4.
Cashmore M, Bond A, Cobb D. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: Theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. J Environ Manage. 2008;88(4):1233–48.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Davenport C, Mathers J, Parry J. Use of health impact assessment in incorporating health considerations in decision making. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(3):196–201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J. The effectiveness of health impact assessment, scope and limitations of supporting decision- making in Europe. Brussels: Europian Observatory on Health systems and policies; 2007.
7.
Harris PJ, Kemp LA, Sainsbury P. The essential elements of health impact assessment and healthy public policy: a qualitative study of practitioner perspectives. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
National Research Council, Committee on Health Impact Assessment. Improving Health in the United States: The Role of Health Impact Assessment. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
9.
Mindell JS, Boltong A, Fordea I. A review of health impact assessment frameworks. Public Health. 2008;122:1177–87.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Lee J, Röbbel N, Dora C. Cross-country analysis of the institutionalization of Health Impact Assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
11.
Hengpraprom S. Developing Tools for Health Impact Assessment in Environmental Impact Assessment in Thailand. Acta Med Okayama. 2005;65(2):123–8.
12.
Phoolcharoen W, Sukkumnoed D, Kessomboon P. Development of health impact assessment in Thailand: recent experiences and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(6):465–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Office NHC. Thailand’s Rules and Procedures for the Health Impact Assessment of Public Policies. Chiangmai, Thailand: Health Impact Assessment Coordinating Unit; 2010.
14.
Winkler MS, Krieger GR, Divall MJ, Cissé G, Wielga M, Singer BH, et al. Untapped potential of health impact assessment. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:298–305.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Islamic Council Assembly of Iran IR. Fifth Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan. Tehran: Islamic Council Assembly; 2011.
16.
Fakhri A. Developing a framework for health impact assessment of developmental plans in Iran. PhD thesis, Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2014. [In persian].
17.
Fakhri A, Maleki M, Gohari M, Harris P. Investigating underlying principles to guide Health Impact Assessment. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(1):17-22.
18.
Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, et al. Assessing health impact assessment: multidisciplinary and international perspectives. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:659–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Douglas MJ, Conway L, Gorman D, Gavin S, Hanlon P. Developing principles for health impact assessment. Public Health Med. 2001;23(2):148–54.CrossRef
20.
Fielding JE, Briss PA. Promoting Evidence-Based Public Health Policy: Can We Have Better Evidence And More Action? Health Aff. 2006;25(4):969–78.CrossRef
21.
Kemm J. Health Impact Assessment: a tool for Healthy Public Policy. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(1):79–85.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
24.
25.
Kemm J. can health impact assessment fulfil the expectation that it raises. Public Health. 2000;114:431–3.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Mannheimer LN, Gulis G, Lehto J, Ostlin P. Introducing Health Impact Assessment: an analysis of political and administrative intersectoral working methods. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17(5):526–31.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: SAGE Publication; 2004.
28.
Ison E. The introduction of health impact assessment in the WHO European Healthy Cities Network. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(1):64–71.CrossRef
29.
Harris P. The Relationship Between Health Impact Assessment and Healthy Public Policy: A Critical Realist Investigation. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales; 2013.
30.
31.
Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Dora C, Fielding JE, Kraft K, et al. Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: An agenda for research and practice. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(2):262–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
33.
Harris P, Spickett J. Health Impact Assessment in Australia: A review and directions for progress. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2011;31(4):425–32.CrossRef
34.
Vohra S, Cave B, Viliani F, Harris-Roxas BF, Bhatia R. New international consensus on health impact assessment. Lancet. 2010;376:1464.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Proposing a framework for Health Impact Assessment in Iran
Authors
Ali Fakhri
Patrick Harris
Mohammadreza Maleki
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1698-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Competition is not necessarily a barrier to community mobilisation among sex workers: an intervention planning assessment from Zimbabwe

Study protocol

The effectiveness of a web-based Dutch parenting program to prevent overweight in children 9–13 years of age: study protocol for a two-armed cluster randomized controlled trial

Research article

Association of high-density lipoprotein with development of metabolic syndrome components: a five-year follow-up in adults

Research article

Viral transmission risk factors in an Egyptian population with high hepatitis C prevalence

Study protocol

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing domestic violence (I-DECIDE)

Research article

The health and economic benefits of reducing intimate partner violence: an Australian example