Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

The health and economic benefits of reducing intimate partner violence: an Australian example

Authors: Dominique A. Cadilhac, Lauren Sheppard, Toby B. Cumming, Tharshanah Thayabaranathan, Dora C. Pearce, Rob Carter, Anne Magnus

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intimate partner violence (IPV) has important impacts on the health of women in society. Our aim was to estimate the health and economic benefits of reducing the prevalence of IPV in the 2008 Australian female adult population.

Methods

Simulation models were developed to show the effect of a 5 percentage point absolute feasible reduction target in the prevalence of IPV from current Australian levels (27 %). IPV is not measured in national surveys. Levels of psychological distress were used as a proxy for exposure to IPV since psychological conditions represent three-quarters of the disease burden from IPV. Lifetime cohort health benefits for females were estimated as fewer incident cases of violence-related disease and injury; deaths; and Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Opportunity cost savings were estimated for the health sector, paid and unpaid production and leisure from reduced incidence of IPV-related disease and deaths. Workforce production gains were estimated by comparing surveyed participation and absenteeism rates of females with moderate psychological distress (lifetime IPV exposure) against high or very high distress (current IPV exposure), and valued using the friction cost approach (FCA). The impact of improved health status on unpaid household production and leisure time were modelled from time use survey data. Potential costs associated with interventions to reduce IPV were not considered. Multivariable uncertainty analyses and univariable sensitivity analyses were undertaken.

Results

A 5 percentage point absolute reduction in the lifetime prevalence of IPV in the 2008 Australian female population was estimated to produce 6000 fewer incident cases of disease/injury, 74 fewer deaths, 5000 fewer DALYs lost and provide gains of 926,000 working days, 371,000 days of home-based production and 428,000 leisure days. Overall, AUD371 million in opportunity cost savings could be achievable. The greatest economic savings would be home-based production (AUD147 million), followed by leisure time (AUD98 million), workforce production (AUD94 million) and reduced health sector costs (AUD38 million).

Conclusions

This study contributes new knowledge about the economic impact of IPV in females. The findings provide evidence of large potential opportunity cost savings from reducing the prevalence of IPV and reinforce the need to reduce IPV in Australia, and elsewhere.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for them Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for them Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Devries KM, Mak JYT, Garcia-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, et al. Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–8.CrossRefPubMed Devries KM, Mak JYT, Garcia-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, et al. Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Johnson H, Ollus N, Nevala S. Violence against women: an international perspective. New York: Springer; 2008. Johnson H, Ollus N, Nevala S. Violence against women: an international perspective. New York: Springer; 2008.
4.
go back to reference VicHealth. The health costs of violence: measuring the burden of disease caused by intimate partner violence. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation; 2004. VicHealth. The health costs of violence: measuring the burden of disease caused by intimate partner violence. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation; 2004.
5.
go back to reference Access Economics. The cost of domestic violence to the Australian economy: Part 1. Melbourne: Access Economics; 2004. p. 90. Access Economics. The cost of domestic violence to the Australian economy: Part 1. Melbourne: Access Economics; 2004. p. 90.
6.
go back to reference Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Watts C, Ellsberg MC, Heise L. WHO Multi-Country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Watts C, Ellsberg MC, Heise L. WHO Multi-Country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
7.
go back to reference Krug EG, Dahlberg TT, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano RE. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 346. Krug EG, Dahlberg TT, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano RE. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 346.
8.
go back to reference Schröttle M, Martinez M, Condon S, Jaspard M, Piispa M, Westerstrand J, et al. Comparative reanalysis of prevalence of violence against women and health impact data in Europe – obstacles and possible solutions. Testing a comparative approach on selected studies. In: vol. 6th Framework Programme, Project No. 506348: Co-ordination Action on Human Rights Violations. 2006. Schröttle M, Martinez M, Condon S, Jaspard M, Piispa M, Westerstrand J, et al. Comparative reanalysis of prevalence of violence against women and health impact data in Europe – obstacles and possible solutions. Testing a comparative approach on selected studies. In: vol. 6th Framework Programme, Project No. 506348: Co-ordination Action on Human Rights Violations. 2006.
9.
go back to reference Stene LE, Jacobsen GW, Dyb G, Tverdal A, Schei B. Intimate partner violence and cardiovascular risk in women: a population-based cohort study. J Womens Health. 2013;22(3):250–8.CrossRef Stene LE, Jacobsen GW, Dyb G, Tverdal A, Schei B. Intimate partner violence and cardiovascular risk in women: a population-based cohort study. J Womens Health. 2013;22(3):250–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roman NV, Frantz JM. The prevalence of intimate partner violence in the family: a systematic review of the implications for adolescents in Africa. Fam Pract. 2013;30(3):256–65.CrossRefPubMed Roman NV, Frantz JM. The prevalence of intimate partner violence in the family: a systematic review of the implications for adolescents in Africa. Fam Pract. 2013;30(3):256–65.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal safety survey, Cat. No. 4906.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal safety survey, Cat. No. 4906.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2012.
12.
13.
go back to reference The National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children. The cost of violence against women and their children. Canberra; 2009. p. 80. The National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children. The cost of violence against women and their children. Canberra; 2009. p. 80.
14.
go back to reference Cadilhac DA, Magnus A, Sheppard L, Cumming TB, Pearce DC, Carter R. The societal benefits of reducing six behavioural risk factors: an economic modelling study from Australia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:483.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cadilhac DA, Magnus A, Sheppard L, Cumming TB, Pearce DC, Carter R. The societal benefits of reducing six behavioural risk factors: an economic modelling study from Australia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:483.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Black MC. Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences: implications for clinicians. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011;5(5):428–39.CrossRef Black MC. Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences: implications for clinicians. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011;5(5):428–39.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, Stevenson C, Stanley L, Lopez AD. The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2007. p. 323. Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, Stevenson C, Stanley L, Lopez AD. The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2007. p. 323.
17.
go back to reference Rehm J, Taylor B, Patra J, Gerhard G. Avoidable burden of disease: conceptual and methodological issues in substance abuse epidemiology. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(4):181–91.CrossRefPubMed Rehm J, Taylor B, Patra J, Gerhard G. Avoidable burden of disease: conceptual and methodological issues in substance abuse epidemiology. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(4):181–91.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Carbone-Lopez K, Kruttschnitt C, Macmillan R. Patterns of intimate partner violence and their associations with physical health, psychological distress, and substance use. Public Health Rep. 2006;121(4):382–92.PubMedPubMedCentral Carbone-Lopez K, Kruttschnitt C, Macmillan R. Patterns of intimate partner violence and their associations with physical health, psychological distress, and substance use. Public Health Rep. 2006;121(4):382–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Health Survey 2004–05, Cat. No. 4364.0. Canberra: ABS; 2006. p. 92. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Health Survey 2004–05, Cat. No. 4364.0. Canberra: ABS; 2006. p. 92.
20.
go back to reference Anderson TM, Sunderland M, Andrews G, Titov N, Dear BF, Sachdev PS. The 10-Item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) as a Screening Instrument in Older Individuals. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(7):596–606.CrossRefPubMed Anderson TM, Sunderland M, Andrews G, Titov N, Dear BF, Sachdev PS. The 10-Item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) as a Screening Instrument in Older Individuals. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(7):596–606.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health expenditure Australia 2000–01. In: Health and welfare expenditure series. Canberra: AIHW; 2002. p. 117. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health expenditure Australia 2000–01. In: Health and welfare expenditure series. Canberra: AIHW; 2002. p. 117.
22.
go back to reference Mathers C, Stevenson C, Carter R, Penm R. Disease costing methodology used in the Disease Costs abd Impact Study 1993–1994. AIHW; 1998. p. 96. Mathers C, Stevenson C, Carter R, Penm R. Disease costing methodology used in the Disease Costs abd Impact Study 1993–1994. AIHW; 1998. p. 96.
23.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. How Australians use their time, 2006, Cat no. 4153.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008. Australian Bureau of Statistics. How Australians use their time, 2006, Cat no. 4153.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008.
24.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. Average weekly earnings, May 2008 Cat no. 6302.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Average weekly earnings, May 2008 Cat no. 6302.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008.
25.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. Labour force Australia, Cat no. 6202.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008. p. 32. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Labour force Australia, Cat no. 6202.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008. p. 32.
26.
go back to reference Cadilhac DA, Cumming TB, Sheppard L, Pearce DC, Carter R, Magnus A. The economic benefits of reducing physical inactivity: an Australian example. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cadilhac DA, Cumming TB, Sheppard L, Pearce DC, Carter R, Magnus A. The economic benefits of reducing physical inactivity: an Australian example. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Magnus A, Cadilhac D, Cumming T, Sheppard L, Pearce D, Carter R. Economic benefits of achieving realistic smoking cessation targets in Australia. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(2):321–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Magnus A, Cadilhac D, Cumming T, Sheppard L, Pearce D, Carter R. Economic benefits of achieving realistic smoking cessation targets in Australia. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(2):321–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Magnus A, Cadilhac D, Cumming T, Sheppard L, Pearce D, Carter R. The economic gains of achieving reduced alcohol consumption targets for Australia. Am J Public Health. 2011;102(7):1313–9.CrossRef Magnus A, Cadilhac D, Cumming T, Sheppard L, Pearce D, Carter R. The economic gains of achieving reduced alcohol consumption targets for Australia. Am J Public Health. 2011;102(7):1313–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National public health expenditure report 2005–06. Canberra: AIHW; 2008. p. 164. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National public health expenditure report 2005–06. Canberra: AIHW; 2008. p. 164.
31.
go back to reference Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
32.
go back to reference Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10(5):460–6.CrossRefPubMed Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10(5):460–6.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Liljas B. How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed Liljas B. How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;13(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. Time use survey: user guide 2006. Cat no. 4153.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Time use survey: user guide 2006. Cat no. 4153.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008.
35.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. National survey of mental health and wellbeing: summary of results, Cat. No. 4326.0. Canberra: ABS; 2007. p. 100. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National survey of mental health and wellbeing: summary of results, Cat. No. 4326.0. Canberra: ABS; 2007. p. 100.
36.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and nonpartner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 50. World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and nonpartner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 50.
37.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statisitcs. Defining the data challenge for family, domestic and sexual violence: a conceptual data framework, report 4529.0. Canberra: ABS; 2013. p. 69. Australian Bureau of Statisitcs. Defining the data challenge for family, domestic and sexual violence: a conceptual data framework, report 4529.0. Canberra: ABS; 2013. p. 69.
Metadata
Title
The health and economic benefits of reducing intimate partner violence: an Australian example
Authors
Dominique A. Cadilhac
Lauren Sheppard
Toby B. Cumming
Tharshanah Thayabaranathan
Dora C. Pearce
Rob Carter
Anne Magnus
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1931-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue