Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Exploring patterns in psychiatric outpatients’ preferences for involvement in decision-making: a latent class analysis approach

Authors: Ingunn Mundal, Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera, Moisés Betancort, Carlos De las Cuevas

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative approach that includes and respects patients’ preferences for involvement in decision-making about their treatment, is increasingly advocated. However, in the practice of clinical psychiatry, implementing SDM seems difficult to accomplish. Although the number of studies related to psychiatric patients’ preferences for involvement is increasing, studies have largely focused on understanding patients in public mental healthcare settings. Thus, investigating patient preferences for involvement in both public and private settings is of particular importance in psychiatric research. The objectives of this study were to identify different latent class typologies of patient preferences for involvement in the decision-making process, and to investigate how patient characteristics predict these typologies in mental healthcare settings.

Methods

We conducted latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups of psychiatric outpatients with similar preferences for involvement in decision-making to estimate the probability that each patient belonged to a certain class based on sociodemographic, clinical and health belief variables.

Results

The LCA included 224 consecutive psychiatric outpatients’ preferences for involvement in treatment decisions in public and private psychiatric settings. The LCA identified three distinct preference typologies, two collaborative and one passive, accounting for 78% of the variance. Class 1 (26%) included collaborative men aged 34–44 years with an average level of education who were treated by public services for a depressive disorder, had high psychological reactance, believed they controlled their disease and had a pharmacophobic attitude. Class 2 (29%) included collaborative women younger than 33 years with an average level of education, who were treated by public services for an anxiety disorder, had low psychological reactance or health control belief and had an unconcerned attitude toward medication. Class 3 (45%) included passive women older than 55 years with lower education levels who had a depressive disorder, had low psychological reactance, attributed the control of their disease to their psychiatrists and had a pharmacophilic attitude.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight how psychiatric patients vary in pattern of preferences for treatment involvement regarding demographic variables and health status, providing insight into understanding the pattern of preferences and comprising a significant advance in mental healthcare research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. Bmj. 2010;341:c5146.CrossRef Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. Bmj. 2010;341:c5146.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference James K. The rationale for shared decision making in mental health care: a systematic review of academic discourse. Ment Health Rev J. 2017;22(3):152–65.CrossRef James K. The rationale for shared decision making in mental health care: a systematic review of academic discourse. Ment Health Rev J. 2017;22(3):152–65.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stead U, Morant N, Ramon S. Shared decision-making in medication management: development of a training intervention. BJPsych Bull. 2017;41(4):221–7.CrossRef Stead U, Morant N, Ramon S. Shared decision-making in medication management: development of a training intervention. BJPsych Bull. 2017;41(4):221–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zisman-Ilani Y, Roe D, Elwyn G, Kupermintz H, Patya N, Peleg I, Karnieli-Miller O. Shared decision making for psychiatric rehabilitation services before discharge from psychiatric hospitals. Health Commun. 2019;34(6):631–7.CrossRef Zisman-Ilani Y, Roe D, Elwyn G, Kupermintz H, Patya N, Peleg I, Karnieli-Miller O. Shared decision making for psychiatric rehabilitation services before discharge from psychiatric hospitals. Health Commun. 2019;34(6):631–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implementation science : IS. 2016;11:114.CrossRef Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implementation science : IS. 2016;11:114.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, Cochran N, Frosch D, Galasinski D, Gulbrandsen P, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. Bmj. 2017;359:j4891.CrossRef Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, Cochran N, Frosch D, Galasinski D, Gulbrandsen P, et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. Bmj. 2017;359:j4891.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fiorillo A, Barlati S, Bellomo A, Corrivetti G, Nicolò G, Sampogna G, Stanga V, Veltro F, Maina G, Vita A. The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical review. Ann General Psychiatry. 2020;19:43.CrossRef Fiorillo A, Barlati S, Bellomo A, Corrivetti G, Nicolò G, Sampogna G, Stanga V, Veltro F, Maina G, Vita A. The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical review. Ann General Psychiatry. 2020;19:43.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;4:Cd001431.PubMed Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;4:Cd001431.PubMed
9.
go back to reference WHO. World Health Report 2008: Primary Health Care Now More than Ever. p. 2008. WHO. World Health Report 2008: Primary Health Care Now More than Ever. p. 2008.
10.
go back to reference Bernal-Delgado E, Garcia-Armesto S, Oliva J, Sanchez Martinez FI, Repullo JR, Pena-Longobardo LM, Ridao-Lopez M, Hernandez-Quevedo C. Spain: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2018;20(2):1–179.PubMed Bernal-Delgado E, Garcia-Armesto S, Oliva J, Sanchez Martinez FI, Repullo JR, Pena-Longobardo LM, Ridao-Lopez M, Hernandez-Quevedo C. Spain: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2018;20(2):1–179.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1980, Volume I: Explorations in Quality Assessment and' Monitoring). p. 176. Donabedian A. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1980, Volume I: Explorations in Quality Assessment and' Monitoring). p. 176.
12.
go back to reference Hamann J, Heres S. Why and how family caregivers should participate in shared decision making in mental health. Psychiatr Serv. 2019;70(5):418–21.CrossRef Hamann J, Heres S. Why and how family caregivers should participate in shared decision making in mental health. Psychiatr Serv. 2019;70(5):418–21.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Slade M. Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(2):146–53.CrossRef Slade M. Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(2):146–53.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference De las Cuevas C, de Leon J. Development and validation of the Patient's health belief questionnaire on psychiatric treatment. Patient Preference Adherence. 2019;13:527–36. De las Cuevas C, de Leon J. Development and validation of the Patient's health belief questionnaire on psychiatric treatment. Patient Preference Adherence. 2019;13:527–36.
15.
go back to reference De las Cuevas C, de Leon J. Reviving research on medication attitudes for improving pharmacotherapy: focusing on adherence. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(2):73–9. De las Cuevas C, de Leon J. Reviving research on medication attitudes for improving pharmacotherapy: focusing on adherence. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(2):73–9.
16.
go back to reference de Leon J, De las Cuevas C. The art of pharmacotherapy: reflections on Pharmacophobia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017;37(2):131–7. de Leon J, De las Cuevas C. The art of pharmacotherapy: reflections on Pharmacophobia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017;37(2):131–7.
17.
go back to reference De las Cuevas C, Penate W, Betancort M, Cabrera C. What do psychiatric patients believe regarding where control over their illness lies? Validation of the multidimensional health locus of control scale in psychiatric outpatient care. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015;203(2):81–6. De las Cuevas C, Penate W, Betancort M, Cabrera C. What do psychiatric patients believe regarding where control over their illness lies? Validation of the multidimensional health locus of control scale in psychiatric outpatient care. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015;203(2):81–6.
18.
go back to reference De las Cuevas C, Peñate W, Betancort M, de Rivera L. Psychological reactance in psychiatric patients: Examining the dimensionality and correlates of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale in a large clinical sample. Personal Individ Differ. 2014;70:85–91. De las Cuevas C, Peñate W, Betancort M, de Rivera L. Psychological reactance in psychiatric patients: Examining the dimensionality and correlates of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale in a large clinical sample. Personal Individ Differ. 2014;70:85–91.
19.
go back to reference De las Cuevas C, Penate W. To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Acta neuropsychiatrica. 2014;26(6):372–81. De las Cuevas C, Penate W. To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Acta neuropsychiatrica. 2014;26(6):372–81.
20.
go back to reference De las Cuevas C, Penate W. Validity of the control preferences scale in patients with emotional disorders. Patient preference and adherence. 2016;10:2351–6. De las Cuevas C, Penate W. Validity of the control preferences scale in patients with emotional disorders. Patient preference and adherence. 2016;10:2351–6.
21.
go back to reference Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nursing Res. 1997;29(3):21–43. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nursing Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.
22.
go back to reference Kryworuchko J, Stacey D, Bennett C, Graham ID. Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):497–503.CrossRef Kryworuchko J, Stacey D, Bennett C, Graham ID. Appraisal of primary outcome measures used in trials of patient decision support. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):497–503.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Solari A, Giordano A, Kasper J, Drulovic J, van Nunen A, Vahter L, Viala F, Pietrolongo E, Pugliatti M, Antozzi C, et al. Role preferences of people with multiple sclerosis: image-revised, computerized self-administered version of the control preference scale. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66127.CrossRef Solari A, Giordano A, Kasper J, Drulovic J, van Nunen A, Vahter L, Viala F, Pietrolongo E, Pugliatti M, Antozzi C, et al. Role preferences of people with multiple sclerosis: image-revised, computerized self-administered version of the control preference scale. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66127.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Corp I. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp: IBM Corp; 2017. Corp I. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp: IBM Corp; 2017.
25.
go back to reference Kongsted A, Nielsen AM. Latent class analysis in health research. J Physiother. 2017;63(1):55–8.CrossRef Kongsted A, Nielsen AM. Latent class analysis in health research. J Physiother. 2017;63(1):55–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zhou M, Thayer WM, Bridges JFP. Using latent class analysis to model preference heterogeneity in health: a systematic review. PharmacoEconomics. 2018;36(2):175–87.CrossRef Zhou M, Thayer WM, Bridges JFP. Using latent class analysis to model preference heterogeneity in health: a systematic review. PharmacoEconomics. 2018;36(2):175–87.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hole AR. Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):1078–94.CrossRef Hole AR. Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):1078–94.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hamann J, Mendel R, Bühner M, Kissling W, Cohen R, Knipfer E, Eckstein HH. How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making--the doctors' view. Health Expectations. 2012;15(4):360–6.CrossRef Hamann J, Mendel R, Bühner M, Kissling W, Cohen R, Knipfer E, Eckstein HH. How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making--the doctors' view. Health Expectations. 2012;15(4):360–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bhugra D, Easter A, Mallaris Y, Gupta S. Clinical decision making in psychiatry by psychiatrists. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124(5):403–11.CrossRef Bhugra D, Easter A, Mallaris Y, Gupta S. Clinical decision making in psychiatry by psychiatrists. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011;124(5):403–11.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Torrey WC, Drake RE. Practicing shared decision making in the outpatient psychiatric care of adults with severe mental illnesses: redesigning care for the future. Community Ment Health J. 2010;46(5):433–40.CrossRef Torrey WC, Drake RE. Practicing shared decision making in the outpatient psychiatric care of adults with severe mental illnesses: redesigning care for the future. Community Ment Health J. 2010;46(5):433–40.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Andrews G. Private and public psychiatry: a comparison of two health care systems. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146(7):881–6.CrossRef Andrews G. Private and public psychiatry: a comparison of two health care systems. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146(7):881–6.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Younes N, Hardy-Bayle MC, Falissard B, Kovess V, Chaillet MP, Gasquet I. Differing mental health practice among general practitioners, private psychiatrists and public psychiatrists. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:104.CrossRef Younes N, Hardy-Bayle MC, Falissard B, Kovess V, Chaillet MP, Gasquet I. Differing mental health practice among general practitioners, private psychiatrists and public psychiatrists. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:104.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hamann J, Heres S. Adapting shared decision making for individuals with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(12):1483–6.CrossRef Hamann J, Heres S. Adapting shared decision making for individuals with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(12):1483–6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Montori VM, Kunneman M, Brito JP. Shared decision making and improving health care: the answer is not in. Jama. 2017;318(7):617–8.CrossRef Montori VM, Kunneman M, Brito JP. Shared decision making and improving health care: the answer is not in. Jama. 2017;318(7):617–8.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Moran-Sanchez I, Gomez-Valles P, Bernal-Lopez MA, Perez-Carceles MD. Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: patients preferences and associated factors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(6):1200–9.CrossRef Moran-Sanchez I, Gomez-Valles P, Bernal-Lopez MA, Perez-Carceles MD. Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: patients preferences and associated factors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(6):1200–9.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Brom L, Hopmans W, Pasman HR, Timmermans DR, Widdershoven GA, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14:25.CrossRef Brom L, Hopmans W, Pasman HR, Timmermans DR, Widdershoven GA, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14:25.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, Voss H, Wynn R. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:53.CrossRef Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, Voss H, Wynn R. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:53.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hamann J, Mendel R, Cohen R, Heres S, Ziegler M, Bühner M, Kissling W. Psychiatrists' use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(8):1107–12.CrossRef Hamann J, Mendel R, Cohen R, Heres S, Ziegler M, Bühner M, Kissling W. Psychiatrists' use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(8):1107–12.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Young HN, Bell RA, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Kravitz RL. Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1404–8.CrossRef Young HN, Bell RA, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Kravitz RL. Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in depression care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1404–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Zisman-Ilani Y, Shern D, Deegan P, Kreyenbuhl J, Dixon L, Drake R, Torrey W, Mishra M, Gorbenko K, Elwyn G. Continue, adjust, or stop antipsychotic medication: developing and user testing an encounter decision aid for people with first-episode and long-term psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):142.CrossRef Zisman-Ilani Y, Shern D, Deegan P, Kreyenbuhl J, Dixon L, Drake R, Torrey W, Mishra M, Gorbenko K, Elwyn G. Continue, adjust, or stop antipsychotic medication: developing and user testing an encounter decision aid for people with first-episode and long-term psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):142.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S, Carlier I, van Vliet I, van Hemert A, Stiggelbout A, Zitman F. Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on shared decision-making regarding treatment decisions for depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in specialized psychiatric care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(2):645–58. Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S, Carlier I, van Vliet I, van Hemert A, Stiggelbout A, Zitman F. Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on shared decision-making regarding treatment decisions for depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in specialized psychiatric care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(2):645–58.
42.
go back to reference Croft P, Altman DG, Deeks JJ, Dunn KM, Hay AD, Hemingway H, LeResche L, Peat G, Perel P, Petersen SE, et al. The science of clinical practice: disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about "what is likely to happen" should shape clinical practice. BMC Med. 2015;13:20.CrossRef Croft P, Altman DG, Deeks JJ, Dunn KM, Hay AD, Hemingway H, LeResche L, Peat G, Perel P, Petersen SE, et al. The science of clinical practice: disease diagnosis or patient prognosis? Evidence about "what is likely to happen" should shape clinical practice. BMC Med. 2015;13:20.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Hemingway H, Croft P, Perel P, Hayden JA, Abrams K, Timmis A, Briggs A, Udumyan R, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: a framework for researching clinical outcomes. Bmj. 2013;346:e5595.CrossRef Hemingway H, Croft P, Perel P, Hayden JA, Abrams K, Timmis A, Briggs A, Udumyan R, Moons KG, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: a framework for researching clinical outcomes. Bmj. 2013;346:e5595.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Lee CK, Stockler MR, Coates AS, Gebski V, Lord SJ, Simes RJ. Self-reported health-related quality of life is an independent predictor of chemotherapy treatment benefit and toxicity in women with advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(9):1341–7.CrossRef Lee CK, Stockler MR, Coates AS, Gebski V, Lord SJ, Simes RJ. Self-reported health-related quality of life is an independent predictor of chemotherapy treatment benefit and toxicity in women with advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(9):1341–7.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Hickling LM, Kouvaras S, Nterian Z, Perez-Iglesias R. Non-adherence to antipsychotic medication in first-episode psychosis patients. Psychiatry Res. 2018;264:151–4.CrossRef Hickling LM, Kouvaras S, Nterian Z, Perez-Iglesias R. Non-adherence to antipsychotic medication in first-episode psychosis patients. Psychiatry Res. 2018;264:151–4.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Lepping P, Stanly T, Turner J. Systematic review on the prevalence of lack of capacity in medical and psychiatric settings. Clin Med (Lond). 2015;15(4):337–43.CrossRef Lepping P, Stanly T, Turner J. Systematic review on the prevalence of lack of capacity in medical and psychiatric settings. Clin Med (Lond). 2015;15(4):337–43.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Yung A, Gill L, Sommerville E, Dowling B, Simon K, Pirkis J, Livingston J, Schweitzer I, Tanaghow A, Herrman H, et al. Public and private psychiatry: can they work together and is it worth the effort? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(1–2):67–73.CrossRef Yung A, Gill L, Sommerville E, Dowling B, Simon K, Pirkis J, Livingston J, Schweitzer I, Tanaghow A, Herrman H, et al. Public and private psychiatry: can they work together and is it worth the effort? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(1–2):67–73.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Russo S, Jongerius C, Faccio F, Pizzoli SFM, Pinto CA, Veldwijk J, Janssens R, Simons G, Falahee M, de Bekker-Grob E, et al. Understanding Patients' preferences: a systematic review of psychological instruments used in Patients' preference and decision studies. Value Health. 2019;22(4):491–501.CrossRef Russo S, Jongerius C, Faccio F, Pizzoli SFM, Pinto CA, Veldwijk J, Janssens R, Simons G, Falahee M, de Bekker-Grob E, et al. Understanding Patients' preferences: a systematic review of psychological instruments used in Patients' preference and decision studies. Value Health. 2019;22(4):491–501.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet (London, England). 2002;359(9302):248–52.CrossRef Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet (London, England). 2002;359(9302):248–52.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring patterns in psychiatric outpatients’ preferences for involvement in decision-making: a latent class analysis approach
Authors
Ingunn Mundal
Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera
Moisés Betancort
Carlos De las Cuevas
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03137-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Psychiatry 1/2021 Go to the issue