Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

The foundations of the working alliance in assertive community treatment teams

Authors: M. van Haaren, S. de Jong, D. P. K. Roeg

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In this study, we aimed to identify and define the fundamental components of the working alliance in multidisciplinary (Flexible) Assertive Community Treatment teams with shared caseloads, in order to support their daily practice and further research.

Methods

After reviewing the literature, concept mapping with professionals and clients was used to define the working alliance in (F) ACT teams. The resulting concept maps formed the basis for the working alliance assessment instrument, which was pilot tested with professionals and clients through cognitive interviews with a think-aloud procedure.

Results

The study led to the development of a twenty five-item assessment instrument to evaluate working alliances in multidisciplinary teams (WAM) that was comprised of three subscales: bond, task/goal and team. Two different versions were developed for clients and professionals.

Conclusions

The WAM instrument was developed to determine the quality of the working alliance in (F) ACT teams. Future research will focus on testing its psychometric properties and predictive value.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference van Veldhuizen JR, Bähler M, Polhuis D, et al. (eds): Handboek FACT. Utrecht, De Tijdstroom, 2008. van Veldhuizen JR, Bähler M, Polhuis D, et al. (eds): Handboek FACT. Utrecht, De Tijdstroom, 2008.
11.
go back to reference Hafkenscheid A. De therapeutische relatie. Utrecht: de Tijdstroom; 2014. Hafkenscheid A. De therapeutische relatie. Utrecht: de Tijdstroom; 2014.
12.
go back to reference Horvath AO, Bedi RP. The alliance. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that work: therapist contributions and responsiveness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. Horvath AO, Bedi RP. The alliance. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that work: therapist contributions and responsiveness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
14.
go back to reference Hunsley J, Di Guilio G. Dodo bird, phoenix, or urban legend? The question of psychotherapy equivalence. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice: Objective Investigations of Controversial and Unorthodox Claims in Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry, and Social Work. 2002;1:11–22. Hunsley J, Di Guilio G. Dodo bird, phoenix, or urban legend? The question of psychotherapy equivalence. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice: Objective Investigations of Controversial and Unorthodox Claims in Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry, and Social Work. 2002;1:11–22.
15.
go back to reference Keijsers GPJ. Het grote psychotherapiedebat. Gedragstherapie. 2014;47:148–72. Keijsers GPJ. Het grote psychotherapiedebat. Gedragstherapie. 2014;47:148–72.
16.
go back to reference Keijsers GPJ, van Minnen A, Verbraak M, et al. Toepassing van protocollaire behandelingen bij psychische stoornissen. In: Keijsers GPJ, Van Minnen A, Verbraak M, et al., editors. Protocollaire behandelingen voor volwassenen met psychische klachten 1. Amsterdam: Boom; 2017. Keijsers GPJ, van Minnen A, Verbraak M, et al. Toepassing van protocollaire behandelingen bij psychische stoornissen. In: Keijsers GPJ, Van Minnen A, Verbraak M, et al., editors. Protocollaire behandelingen voor volwassenen met psychische klachten 1. Amsterdam: Boom; 2017.
18.
go back to reference Wampold BE. The research evidence for the common factors models: a historically situated perspective. In: Duncan BL, editor. The heart and soul of change: delivering what works in therapy. Miller SD: Wampold BE et al. American Psychological Association; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/12075-002.CrossRef Wampold BE. The research evidence for the common factors models: a historically situated perspective. In: Duncan BL, editor. The heart and soul of change: delivering what works in therapy. Miller SD: Wampold BE et al. American Psychological Association; 2010. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​12075-002.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Allness DJ, Knoedler WH. A manual for ACT start-up: based on the PACT model of community treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses. 2nd. ed. National Alliance on Mental Illness: Arlington VA; 2003. Allness DJ, Knoedler WH. A manual for ACT start-up: based on the PACT model of community treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses. 2nd. ed. National Alliance on Mental Illness: Arlington VA; 2003.
30.
go back to reference Gunderson JG, Links PS. Borderline personality disorder: a clinical guide. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishers; 2008. Gunderson JG, Links PS. Borderline personality disorder: a clinical guide. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishers; 2008.
45.
go back to reference Hasson D, Arnetz BB: Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. Likert scales for psychosocial measurements. Int Electron J Health Educ 2005;8:178–192. Hasson D, Arnetz BB: Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. Likert scales for psychosocial measurements. Int Electron J Health Educ 2005;8:178–192.
47.
go back to reference Campanelli P. Testing survey questions. In: De Leeuw ED, editor. International handbook of survey methodology. Hox JJ: Dillman DA; 2008. www.eam-online.org. Campanelli P. Testing survey questions. In: De Leeuw ED, editor. International handbook of survey methodology. Hox JJ: Dillman DA; 2008. www.​eam-online.​org.
48.
go back to reference Martin E: Survey Questionnaire Construction, in Research Report Series. Survey Methodology. Washington, U.S. Census Bureau, 2006. Martin E: Survey Questionnaire Construction, in Research Report Series. Survey Methodology. Washington, U.S. Census Bureau, 2006.
Metadata
Title
The foundations of the working alliance in assertive community treatment teams
Authors
M. van Haaren
S. de Jong
D. P. K. Roeg
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03563-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Psychiatry 1/2021 Go to the issue