Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Psychiatry
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

The PULSAR primary care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to test a training intervention for general practitioners in recovery-oriented practice to optimize personal recovery in adult patients

Authors: Joanne C. Enticott, Frances Shawyer, Lisa Brophy, Grant Russell, Ellie Fossey, Brett Inder, Danielle Mazza, Shiva Vasi, Penelope June Weller, Elisabeth Wilson-Evered, Vrinda Edan, Graham Meadows

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

General practitioners (GPs) in Australia play a central role in the delivery of mental health care. This article describes the PULSAR (Principles Unite Local Services Assisting Recovery) Primary Care protocol, a novel mixed methods evaluation of a training intervention for GPs in recovery-oriented practice. The aim of the intervention is to optimize personal recovery in patients consulting study GPs for mental health issues.

Methods

The intervention mixed methods design involves a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial testing the outcomes of training in recovery-oriented practice, together with an embedded qualitative study to identify the contextual enablers and challenges to implementing recovery-oriented practice. The project is conducted in Victoria, Australia between 2013 and 2017. Eighteen general practices and community health centers are randomly allocated to one of two steps (nine months apart) to start an intervention comprising GP training in the delivery of recovery-oriented practice. Data collection consists of cross-sectional surveys collected from patients of participating GPs at baseline, and again at the end of Steps 1 and 2. The primary outcome is improvement in personal recovery using responses to the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery. Secondary outcomes are improvements in patient-rated measures of personal recovery and wellbeing, and of the recovery-oriented practice they have received, using the INSPIRE questionnaire, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Participant data will be analyzed in the group that the cluster was assigned to at each study time point. Another per-protocol dataset will contain all data time-stamped according to the date of intervention received at each cluster site. Qualitative interviews with GPs and patients at three and nine months post-training will investigate experiences and challenges related to implementing recovery-oriented practice in primary care.

Discussion

Recovery-oriented practice is gaining increasing prominence in mental health service delivery and the outcomes of such an approach within the primary care sector for the first time will be evaluated in this project. If findings are positive, the intervention has the potential to extend recovery-oriented practice to GPs throughout the community.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12614001312​639). Registered: 8 August 2014.
Literature
1.
Burgess PM, Pirkis JE, Slade TN, Johnston AK, Meadows GN, Gunn JM. Service use for mental health problems: findings from the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43(7):615–23. doi:10.​1080/​0004867090297085​8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, Bayram C, Harrison C, Valenti L, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2014–15. General practice series no. 38. Sydney: Sydney University Press; 2015.
3.
4.
5.
Stone L, Blashki G. The role of GPs in mental health care. In: Meadows G, Farhall JF, Fossey EM, Grigg M, McDermott FM, Singh B, editors. Mental health in Australia: collaborative community practice. 3rd ed. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 275–9.
6.
7.
8.
Department of Health and Aging. National Mental Health Report 2013: tracking progress of mental health reform in Australia, 1993–2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2013.
9.
Shepherd G, Boardman J, Slade M. Making recovery a reality. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health; 2008.
10.
Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council. A national framework for recovery-oriented mental health services: guide for practitioners and providers. Canberra: Commonwealth Government; 2013.
11.
Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16(4):521–38.
12.
13.
Slade M, Amering M, Oades L. Recovery: an international perspective. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2008;17(2):128–37.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Slade M, Leamy M, Bacon F, Janosik M, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, et al. International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012;21(4):353–64.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Slade M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Farkas M, Grey B, Larsen J, et al. Development of the REFOCUS intervention to increase mental health team support for personal recovery. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;207(6):544–50.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Slade M, Bird V, Clarke E, Le Boutillier C, McCrone P, Macpherson R et al. Supporting recovery in patients with psychosis through care by community-based adult mental health teams (REFOCUS): a multisite, cluster, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(6):503–14. doi:10.​1016/​S2215-0366(15)00086-3.
17.
Gerrand V, Singh B, Nagel T, Ash D, Turnbull C, Meadows G, et al. Mental health services in Australia. In: Meadows G, Farhall JF, Fossey EM, Grigg M, McDermott FM, Singh B, editors. Mental health in Australia: collaborative community practice. 3rd ed. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 69–117.
18.
Ash D, Bland R, Brown P, Browne MO, Edwards R, Emmerson B, et al. Mental health services in the Australian states and territories. In: Meadows G, Farhall JF, Fossey EM, Grigg M, McDermott FM, Singh B, editors. Mental health in Australia: collaborative community practice. 3rd ed. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 118–54.
19.
Meadows GN, Enticott J, Castle D. Psychiatry and primary care. In: Bloch S, Green S, Janca S, Mitchell P, Robertson M, editors. Foundations of Clinical Psychiatry. 4th ed.: Melbourne University Publishing; in press
20.
Bird V, Leamy M, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. REFOCUS: Promoting recovery in community mental health services. London: Rethink. 2011.
21.
Edan V, Meadows G, Brophy L, Weller P, Thornton C. PULSAR research: making mental health services more recovery-orientated. New Paradigm: Aust J Psychosoc Rehabil. Elsternwick. Victoria: Psychiatric Disability Services of Victoria; 2015. p. 46–8.
22.
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Stubblefield C, Mutha S. Provider-patient roles in chronic disease management. J Allied Health. 2002;31(2):87–92.PubMed
24.
25.
Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):796–804.PubMed
26.
Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Creswell JW. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2014.
28.
Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.
29.
Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:1–7. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​h1258.CrossRef
30.
Wallace G, Bird V, Leamy M, Bacon F, Le Boutillier C, Janosik M, et al. Service user experiences of REFOCUS: a process evaluation of a pro-recovery complex intervention. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(9):1275–84. doi:10.​1007/​s00127-016-1257-9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Bhanbhro S, Gee M, Cook S, Marston L, Lean M, Killaspy H. Recovery-based staff training intervention within mental health rehabilitation units: a two-stage analysis using realistic evaluation principles and framework approach. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):292. doi:10.​1186/​s12888-016-0999-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
33.
De Allegri M, Pokhrel S, Becher H, Dong H, Mansmann U, Kouyaté B, et al. Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: an application to the study of the impact of community health insurance. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008;6(1):10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Mdege ND, Man M-S, Taylor CA, Torgerson DJ. Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(9):936–48.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
37.
38.
General Practice Mental Health Standards Collaboration. Mental health education standards 2014–2016: a handbook for training providers. Melbourne: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; 2013.
39.
Scott NW, McPherson GC, Ramsay CR, Campbell MK. The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review. Control Clin Trials. 2002;23(6):662–74.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
42.
Horspool MJ, Julious SA, Mooney C, May R, Sully B, Smithson WH. Preventing and lessening exacerbations of asthma in school-aged children associated with a new term (PLEASANT): recruiting primary care research sites–the PLEASANT experience. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015;25:15066. doi:10.​1038/​npjpcrm.​2015.​66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria: Association for Talent Development; 2016.
44.
Neil ST, Kilbride M, Pitt L, Nothard S, Welford M, Sellwood W, et al. The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): a measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches. 2009;1(2):145–55. doi:10.​1080/​1752243090291345​0.CrossRef
45.
Williams J, Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Norton S, Pesola F, et al. Development and evaluation of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(5):777–86.CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76.CrossRefPubMed
48.
McNab C, Meadows G. The General-practice Users’ Perceived-need Inventory (‘GUPI’): a brief general practice tool to assist in bringing mental healthcare needs to professional attention. Prim Care Mental Health. 2005;3(2):93–101.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
Glied S, Smith PC. The Oxford handbook of health economics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.CrossRef
54.
Shawyer F, Enticott JC, Özmen M, Inder B, Meadows GN. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for recurrent major depression: a ‘best buy’ for health care? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016. doi:10.1177/0004867416642847
55.
Stetler CB, Damschroder LJ, Helfrich CD, Hagedorn HJ. A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework - a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19(4):297–304.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Palmer VJ, Chondros P, Piper D, Callander R, Weavell W, Godbee K, et al. The CORE study protocol: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to test a co-design technique to optimise psychosocial recovery outcomes for people affected by mental illness in the community mental health setting. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006688. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2014-006688.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The PULSAR primary care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to test a training intervention for general practitioners in recovery-oriented practice to optimize personal recovery in adult patients
Authors
Joanne C. Enticott
Frances Shawyer
Lisa Brophy
Grant Russell
Ellie Fossey
Brett Inder
Danielle Mazza
Shiva Vasi
Penelope June Weller
Elisabeth Wilson-Evered
Vrinda Edan
Graham Meadows
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1153-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Psychiatry 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

An international comparison of the deinstitutionalisation of mental health care: Development and findings of the Mental Health Services Deinstitutionalisation Measure (MENDit)

Research article

Nationwide population-based cohort study of psychiatric disorders in individuals with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome or hypermobility syndrome and their siblings

Research article

Psychiatric readmissions and their association with environmental and health system characteristics: a systematic review of the literature

Research article

Experiences of support in working toward personal recovery goals: a collaborative, qualitative study

Research article

Prenatal smoking exposure and neuropsychiatric comorbidity of ADHD: a finnish nationwide population-based cohort study

Research article

Psychometric properties of the 7-item game addiction scale among french and German speaking adults