Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Recovery-based staff training intervention within mental health rehabilitation units: a two-stage analysis using realistic evaluation principles and framework approach

Authors: Sadiq Bhanbhro, Melanie Gee, Sarah Cook, Louise Marston, Melanie Lean, Helen Killaspy

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Long-term change in recovery-based practice in mental health rehabilitation is a research priority.

Methods

We used a qualitative case study analysis using a blend of traditional ‘framework’ analysis and ‘realist’ approaches to carry out an evaluation of a recovery-focused staff training intervention within three purposively selected mental health rehabilitation units. We maximised the validity of the data by triangulating multiple data sources.

Results

We found that organisational culture and embedding of a change management programme in routine practice were reported as key influences in sustaining change in practice. The qualitative study generated 10 recommendations on how to achieve long-term change in practice including addressing pre-existing organisational issues and synergising concurrent change programmes.

Conclusions

We propose that a recovery-focused staff training intervention requires clear leadership and integration with any existing change management programmes to facilitate sustained improvements in routine practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health. Guidance for commissioners of rehabilitation services for people with complex mental health needs. London: JCP-MH; 2012. Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health. Guidance for commissioners of rehabilitation services for people with complex mental health needs. London: JCP-MH; 2012.
2.
go back to reference Wolfson P, Holloway F, Killaspy H. Enabling recovery for people with complex mental health needs: a template for rehabilitation services in England. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2009. Wolfson P, Holloway F, Killaspy H. Enabling recovery for people with complex mental health needs: a template for rehabilitation services in England. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2009.
3.
go back to reference Cook S, Mundy T, Killaspy K, et al. Development of a staff training intervention for inpatient mental health rehabilitation units to increase service users’ engagement in activities. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;79(3):1–9. Cook S, Mundy T, Killaspy K, et al. Development of a staff training intervention for inpatient mental health rehabilitation units to increase service users’ engagement in activities. Br J Occup Ther. 2015;79(3):1–9.
4.
go back to reference Killaspy H, Marston L, Green N, et al. Clinical effectiveness of a staff training intervention in mental health inpatient rehabilitation units designed to increase patients’ engagement in activities (the Rehabilitation Effectiveness for Activities for Life [REAL] study): single-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:38–48.CrossRefPubMed Killaspy H, Marston L, Green N, et al. Clinical effectiveness of a staff training intervention in mental health inpatient rehabilitation units designed to increase patients’ engagement in activities (the Rehabilitation Effectiveness for Activities for Life [REAL] study): single-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:38–48.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lean M, Leavey G, Killaspy H, et al. Barriers to the sustainability of an intervention designed to improve patient engagement within NHS mental health rehabilitation units: a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lean M, Leavey G, Killaspy H, et al. Barriers to the sustainability of an intervention designed to improve patient engagement within NHS mental health rehabilitation units: a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Killaspy H, Marston L, Green N, et al. Clinical outcomes and costs for people with complex psychosis; a naturalistic prospective cohort study of mental health rehabilitation service users in England. BMC Psych. 2016;16:95. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0797-6.CrossRef Killaspy H, Marston L, Green N, et al. Clinical outcomes and costs for people with complex psychosis; a naturalistic prospective cohort study of mental health rehabilitation service users in England. BMC Psych. 2016;16:95. doi:10.​1186/​s12888-016-0797-6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
9.
go back to reference Chen H, Rossi P. Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach. Evaluation Rev. 1983;7:283–302.CrossRef Chen H, Rossi P. Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach. Evaluation Rev. 1983;7:283–302.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist Evaluation. London: British Cabinet Office; 2004. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist Evaluation. London: British Cabinet Office; 2004.
12.
go back to reference Jolley S, Garety PA, Ellett L, et al. A validation of a new measure of activity in psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2006;85:288–95.CrossRefPubMed Jolley S, Garety PA, Ellett L, et al. A validation of a new measure of activity in psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2006;85:288–95.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
14.
go back to reference Sobh R, Perry C. Research design and data analysis in realism research. Eur J Marketing. 2006;40:1194–209.CrossRef Sobh R, Perry C. Research design and data analysis in realism research. Eur J Marketing. 2006;40:1194–209.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case Study Research - Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. Yin RK. Case Study Research - Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
16.
go back to reference QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative analysis software. 2012;10. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative analysis software. 2012;10.
17.
go back to reference Robson C. Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell; 2002. Robson C. Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell; 2002.
18.
go back to reference Leamy M, Bird V, Boutillier CL, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;199:445–52.CrossRef Leamy M, Bird V, Boutillier CL, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;199:445–52.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Whitley R, Drake RE. Recovery: A dimensional approach. Psychiatric Servicers. 2010;61(12):1248–50.CrossRef Whitley R, Drake RE. Recovery: A dimensional approach. Psychiatric Servicers. 2010;61(12):1248–50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gilburt H, Slade M, Bird V, Oduola S, Craig TKJ. Promoting recovery-oriented practice in mental health services: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gilburt H, Slade M, Bird V, Oduola S, Craig TKJ. Promoting recovery-oriented practice in mental health services: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Oades L, Deane F, Crowe T, Lambert GW, Kavanagh D, Lloyd C. Collaborative recovery: an integrative model for working with individuals who experience chronic and recurring mental illness. Australas Psychiatry. 2005;13(3):279–84.PubMed Oades L, Deane F, Crowe T, Lambert GW, Kavanagh D, Lloyd C. Collaborative recovery: an integrative model for working with individuals who experience chronic and recurring mental illness. Australas Psychiatry. 2005;13(3):279–84.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Brian H, Cook S, Taylor D, Freeman L, Mundy T, Killaspy H. Occupational therapists as change agents in multidisciplinary teams. Br J Occup Ther. 2015:1–9. doi:10.1177/0308022615586785. Brian H, Cook S, Taylor D, Freeman L, Mundy T, Killaspy H. Occupational therapists as change agents in multidisciplinary teams. Br J Occup Ther. 2015:1–9. doi:10.​1177/​0308022615586785​.
23.
go back to reference Hawkins A. The case for experimental design in realist evaluation. Learning Communities. Int J Learning in Soc Contexts. 2014;4(Special Issue: Evaluation):46–59.CrossRef Hawkins A. The case for experimental design in realist evaluation. Learning Communities. Int J Learning in Soc Contexts. 2014;4(Special Issue: Evaluation):46–59.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Manzano A. The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation. 2016;5:1356389016638615. Manzano A. The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation. 2016;5:1356389016638615.
Metadata
Title
Recovery-based staff training intervention within mental health rehabilitation units: a two-stage analysis using realistic evaluation principles and framework approach
Authors
Sadiq Bhanbhro
Melanie Gee
Sarah Cook
Louise Marston
Melanie Lean
Helen Killaspy
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0999-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Psychiatry 1/2016 Go to the issue