Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

From positive screen to engagement in treatment: a preliminary study of the impact of a new model of care for prisoners with serious mental illness

Authors: Krishna Pillai, Paul Rouse, Brian McKenna, Jeremy Skipworth, James Cavney, Rees Tapsell, Alexander Simpson, Dominic Madell

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The high prevalence of serious mental illness (SMI) in prisons remains a challenge for mental health services. Many prisoners with SMI do not receive care. Screening tools have been developed but better detection has not translated to higher rates of treatment. In New Zealand a Prison Model of Care (PMOC) was developed by forensic mental health and correctional services to address this challenge. The PMOC broadened triggers for referrals to mental health teams. Referrals were triaged by mental health nurses leading to multidisciplinary team assessment within specified timeframes. This pathway for screening, referral and assessment was introduced within existing resources.

Method

The PMOC was implemented across four prisons. An AB research design was used to explore the extent to which mentally ill prisoners were referred to and accepted by prison in-reach mental health teams and to determine the proportion of prison population receiving specialist mental health care.

Results

The number of prisoners in the study in the year before the PMOC (n = 19,349) was similar to the year after (n = 19,421). 24.6 % of prisoners were screened as per the PMOC in the post period. Referrals increased from 491 to 734 in the post period (Z = −7.23, p < 0.0001). A greater number of triage assessments occurred after the introduction of the PMOC (pre = 458; post = 613, Z = 4.74, p < 0.0001) leading to a significant increase in the numbers accepted onto in-reach caseloads (pre = 338; post = 426, Z = 3.16, p < 0.01). Numbers of triage assessments completed within specified time frames showed no statistically significant difference before or after implementation. The proportion of prison population on in-reach caseloads increased from 5.6 % in the pre period to 7.0 % in the year post implementation while diagnostic patterns did not change, indicating more prisoners with SMI were identified and engaged in treatment.

Conclusions

The PMOC led to increased prisoner numbers across screening, referral, treatment and engagement. Gains were achieved without extra resources by consistent processes and improved clarity of professional roles and tasks. The PMOC described a more effective pathway to specialist care for people with SMI entering prison.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fazel S, Seewald. Severe mental illness in 33,588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:364–73.PubMedCrossRef Fazel S, Seewald. Severe mental illness in 33,588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:364–73.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Senior J, Birmingham L, Harty M, Hassan L, Hayes A, Kendall K, et al. Identification and management of prisoners with severe psychiatric illness by specialist mental health services. Psychol Med. 2013;43:1511–20.PubMedCrossRef Senior J, Birmingham L, Harty M, Hassan L, Hayes A, Kendall K, et al. Identification and management of prisoners with severe psychiatric illness by specialist mental health services. Psychol Med. 2013;43:1511–20.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Simpson A, Brinded P, Fairley N, Laidlaw T, Malcolm F. Does ethnicity affect need for mental health service among New Zealand prisoners? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003;37(6):728–34.PubMedCrossRef Simpson A, Brinded P, Fairley N, Laidlaw T, Malcolm F. Does ethnicity affect need for mental health service among New Zealand prisoners? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003;37(6):728–34.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grubin D, Carson D, Parsons S. Report on New Prison Reception Health Screening Arrangements: The Results of a Pilot Study in 10 Prisons. University of Newcastle; 2002. Grubin D, Carson D, Parsons S. Report on New Prison Reception Health Screening Arrangements: The Results of a Pilot Study in 10 Prisons. University of Newcastle; 2002.
5.
go back to reference Evans C, Brinded P, Simpson A, Frampton C, Mulder R. Validation of brief screening tools for mental disorders among New Zealand prisoners. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:923–38.PubMedCrossRef Evans C, Brinded P, Simpson A, Frampton C, Mulder R. Validation of brief screening tools for mental disorders among New Zealand prisoners. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:923–38.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Martin M, Colman I, Simpson A, McKenzie K. Mental Health Screening Tools in Correctional Institutions: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:275.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Martin M, Colman I, Simpson A, McKenzie K. Mental Health Screening Tools in Correctional Institutions: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:275.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hayes A, Senior J, Fahy T, Shaw J. Actions taken in response to mental health screening at reception into prison. J Forenc Psych Psych. 2014;25(4):371–9.CrossRef Hayes A, Senior J, Fahy T, Shaw J. Actions taken in response to mental health screening at reception into prison. J Forenc Psych Psych. 2014;25(4):371–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schilders M, Ogloff J. Review of point of reception mental health screening outcomes in an Australian Prison. J Forenc Psych Psych. 2014;25(4):480–94.CrossRef Schilders M, Ogloff J. Review of point of reception mental health screening outcomes in an Australian Prison. J Forenc Psych Psych. 2014;25(4):480–94.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference McInerney C, Davoren M, Flynn G, Mullins D, Fitzpatrick M, Caddow M, et al. Implementing a court diversion and liaison scheme in a remand prison by systematic screening of new receptions: a 6 year participatory action research study of 20,084 consecutive male remands. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2013;7:18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McInerney C, Davoren M, Flynn G, Mullins D, Fitzpatrick M, Caddow M, et al. Implementing a court diversion and liaison scheme in a remand prison by systematic screening of new receptions: a 6 year participatory action research study of 20,084 consecutive male remands. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2013;7:18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brinded P, Simpson A, Laidlaw T, Fairley N, Malcolm F. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in New Zealand prisons: A national survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001;35:166–73.PubMedCrossRef Brinded P, Simpson A, Laidlaw T, Fairley N, Malcolm F. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in New Zealand prisons: A national survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001;35:166–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ministry of Health. Census of Forensic Mental Health Services 2005. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2007. Ministry of Health. Census of Forensic Mental Health Services 2005. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2007.
12.
go back to reference McKenna B, Skipworth J, Tapsell R, Madell D, Pillai K, Simpson A, Cavney J. Rouse P. Prison mental health in-reach: the impact of innovation on transition planning, community mental health service engagement and re-offending. Crim Behav Ment Health 2015, DOI:10.1002/cbm.1942. McKenna B, Skipworth J, Tapsell R, Madell D, Pillai K, Simpson A, Cavney J. Rouse P. Prison mental health in-reach: the impact of innovation on transition planning, community mental health service engagement and re-offending. Crim Behav Ment Health 2015, DOI:10.1002/cbm.1942.
13.
go back to reference Steadman H, Scott J, Osher F, Agnese T, Robbins P. Validation of the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:816–22.PubMedCrossRef Steadman H, Scott J, Osher F, Agnese T, Robbins P. Validation of the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:816–22.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
From positive screen to engagement in treatment: a preliminary study of the impact of a new model of care for prisoners with serious mental illness
Authors
Krishna Pillai
Paul Rouse
Brian McKenna
Jeremy Skipworth
James Cavney
Rees Tapsell
Alexander Simpson
Dominic Madell
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0711-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Psychiatry 1/2016 Go to the issue