Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Brazilian Portuguese version of the Amsterdam infant stool scale: a valid and reliable scale for evaluation of stool from children up to 120 days old

Authors: Laura Cantisano de Deus Silva, Priscila Monaro Bianchini, Erika Veruska Paiva Ortolan, Juliana Fattori Hamamoto, Rosemary Fermiano, Rebeca Mayara Padilha Rego, João César Lyra, Marc Alexander Benninga, Pedro Luiz Toledo de Arruda Lourenção

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For newborns and infants wearing diapers the difficulties in characterizing the appearance of the stool are significant, since the changes in consistency, quantity, and color of the stool are higher than in other age groups. The Amsterdam Infant Stool Scale (AISS) was created and validated in 2009, providing a specific tool for the evaluation of the stool of children up to 120 days old. However, to be used in clinical practice and scientific investigations in Brazil, it is mandatory to perform the translation and cross-cultural adaptation process for Brazilian Portuguese language. Thus, we aim to perform the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of AISS into Brazilian Portuguese and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the translated version.

Methods

The process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the internationally accepted methodology, including: translation, summary of translations, backtranslation, preparation of the pre-final version, application of the pre-test and determination of the final version. The evaluation of the psychometric properties was performed through the application of Brazilian Portuguese AISS, by five examiners (including child health field specialists and a literate adult lay on the subject), analyzing 238 stool photographs of children under 120 days old. The intra and inter-examiner agreement values were determined using kappa statistic. The validity of the criterion was investigated through correlation analysis (Kendall’s coefficient) between the classifications determined by the non-specialist examiner and the expert examiners.

Results

In all 30 tests performed between different examiners, there was an agreement considered as at least moderate (kappa values above 0.40). The intra-examiner reliability was considered as substantial (kappa> 0.6). There was a statistically significant correlation (p <  0.05) between the classifications determined by the examiners considered as specialists and the examiner considered as non-specialist.

Conclusion

The Brazilian Portuguese AISS version proved to be valid and reliable to be used by healthcare professionals and the general public in the evaluation of stool from children up to 120 days old.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bekkali N, Hamers SL, Reitsma JB, Van Toledo L, Benninga MA. Infant stool form scale: development and results. J Pediatr. 2009;154(4):521–6.CrossRef Bekkali N, Hamers SL, Reitsma JB, Van Toledo L, Benninga MA. Infant stool form scale: development and results. J Pediatr. 2009;154(4):521–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ghanma A, Puttemans K, Deneyer M, Benninga MA, Vandenplas Y. Amsterdam infant stool scale is more useful for assessing children who have not been toilet trained than Bristol stool scale. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(2):91–2.CrossRef Ghanma A, Puttemans K, Deneyer M, Benninga MA, Vandenplas Y. Amsterdam infant stool scale is more useful for assessing children who have not been toilet trained than Bristol stool scale. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(2):91–2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Huysentruyt K, Koppen Y, Benninga MA, Cattaert T, Cheng Z, De Geyter C, et al. The Brussels infant and toddler stool scale: a study on Interobserver reliability. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;68(2):207–213.2.CrossRef Huysentruyt K, Koppen Y, Benninga MA, Cattaert T, Cheng Z, De Geyter C, et al. The Brussels infant and toddler stool scale: a study on Interobserver reliability. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;68(2):207–213.2.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gustin J, Gibb R, Kenneally D, Kutay B, Siu SW, Roe D. Characterizing Exclusively Breastfed Infant Stool via a Novel Infant Stool Scale. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S5–S11.CrossRef Gustin J, Gibb R, Kenneally D, Kutay B, Siu SW, Roe D. Characterizing Exclusively Breastfed Infant Stool via a Novel Infant Stool Scale. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S5–S11.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, et al. Evaluation and treatment if functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(2):258–74.CrossRef Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, et al. Evaluation and treatment if functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(2):258–74.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kołodziej M, Bebenek D, Konarska Z, Szajewska H. Gelatine tannate in the management of acute gastroenteritis in children: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 May 24;8(5):e020205.PubMedPubMedCentral Kołodziej M, Bebenek D, Konarska Z, Szajewska H. Gelatine tannate in the management of acute gastroenteritis in children: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 May 24;8(5):e020205.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Maragkoudaki M, Chouliaras G, Moutafi A, Thomas A, Orfanakou A, Papadopoulou A. Efficacy of an Oral rehydration solution enriched with lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and zinc in the Management of Acute Diarrhoea in infants: a randomized, double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1189.CrossRef Maragkoudaki M, Chouliaras G, Moutafi A, Thomas A, Orfanakou A, Papadopoulou A. Efficacy of an Oral rehydration solution enriched with lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and zinc in the Management of Acute Diarrhoea in infants: a randomized, double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1189.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wojtyniak K, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P. In vivo assessment by parents and a physician using the Amsterdam Infant Stool Scale provided better inter-rater agreement than photographic evaluation. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(3):529–31.CrossRef Wojtyniak K, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P. In vivo assessment by parents and a physician using the Amsterdam Infant Stool Scale provided better inter-rater agreement than photographic evaluation. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(3):529–31.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417–32.CrossRef Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417–32.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jozala DR, Oliveira IS, Ortolan EVP, Oliveira Junior WE, Comes GT, Cassettari VM, et al. Brazilian Portuguese translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reproducibility assessment of the modified Bristol stool form scale for children. J Pediatr. 2019;95(3):321–7.CrossRef Jozala DR, Oliveira IS, Ortolan EVP, Oliveira Junior WE, Comes GT, Cassettari VM, et al. Brazilian Portuguese translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reproducibility assessment of the modified Bristol stool form scale for children. J Pediatr. 2019;95(3):321–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Silva FC, Thuler LCS. Cross-cultural adaptation and translation of two pain assessment tools in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2008;84(4):344–9. Silva FC, Thuler LCS. Cross-cultural adaptation and translation of two pain assessment tools in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2008;84(4):344–9.
13.
go back to reference Grassi-Oliveira R, Stein LM, Pezzi JC. Tradução e validação de conteúdo da versão em português do Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40:249–55.CrossRef Grassi-Oliveira R, Stein LM, Pezzi JC. Tradução e validação de conteúdo da versão em português do Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40:249–55.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF 36). Rev Bras Reumatol. 1999;39:143–50. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF 36). Rev Bras Reumatol. 1999;39:143–50.
15.
go back to reference Miot HA. Agreement analysis in clinical and experimental trials. J Vasc Bras. 2016;15(2):89–92.CrossRef Miot HA. Agreement analysis in clinical and experimental trials. J Vasc Bras. 2016;15(2):89–92.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.
17.
go back to reference Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude Brasília. 2017;26(3):649–59.CrossRef Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude Brasília. 2017;26(3):649–59.CrossRef
18.
19.
go back to reference Bakshi B, Sutcliffe A, Akindolie M, Vadamalayan B, John S, Arkley C, et al. How reliably can paediatric professionals identify pale stool from cholestatic newborns? [published correction appears in arch dis child fetal neonatal Ed. 2013 mar;98(2):F180]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(5):F385–7. Bakshi B, Sutcliffe A, Akindolie M, Vadamalayan B, John S, Arkley C, et al. How reliably can paediatric professionals identify pale stool from cholestatic newborns? [published correction appears in arch dis child fetal neonatal Ed. 2013 mar;98(2):F180]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(5):F385–7.
20.
go back to reference Fawaz R, Baumann U, Ekong U, Fischler B, Hadzic N, Mack CL, et al. Guideline for the evaluation of Cholestatic jaundice in infants: joint recommendations of the north American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(1):154–68. Fawaz R, Baumann U, Ekong U, Fischler B, Hadzic N, Mack CL, et al. Guideline for the evaluation of Cholestatic jaundice in infants: joint recommendations of the north American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(1):154–68.
21.
go back to reference Chumpitazi BP, Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Weidler EM, Swank PR, Shulman RJ. Creation and initial evaluation of a stool form scale for children. J Pediatr. 2010;157:594–7.CrossRef Chumpitazi BP, Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Weidler EM, Swank PR, Shulman RJ. Creation and initial evaluation of a stool form scale for children. J Pediatr. 2010;157:594–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Reliability and validity of a modified Bristol stool form scale for children. J Pediatr. 2011;159:437–41.CrossRef Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Reliability and validity of a modified Bristol stool form scale for children. J Pediatr. 2011;159:437–41.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chumpitazi BP, Self MM, Czyzewski DI, Cejka S, Swank PR, Shulman RJ. Bristol stool form scale reliability and agreement decreases when determining Rome III stool form designations. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:443–8.CrossRef Chumpitazi BP, Self MM, Czyzewski DI, Cejka S, Swank PR, Shulman RJ. Bristol stool form scale reliability and agreement decreases when determining Rome III stool form designations. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:443–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Vandenplas Y, Szajewska H, Benninga M, Di Lorenzo C, Dupont C, Faure C, Miqdadi M, Osatakul S, Ribes-Konickx C, Saps M, Shamir R, Staiano A, BITSS Study Group. Development of the Brussels infant and toddler stool scale ('BITSS'): protocol of the study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e014620. Vandenplas Y, Szajewska H, Benninga M, Di Lorenzo C, Dupont C, Faure C, Miqdadi M, Osatakul S, Ribes-Konickx C, Saps M, Shamir R, Staiano A, BITSS Study Group. Development of the Brussels infant and toddler stool scale ('BITSS'): protocol of the study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(3):e014620.
Metadata
Title
Brazilian Portuguese version of the Amsterdam infant stool scale: a valid and reliable scale for evaluation of stool from children up to 120 days old
Authors
Laura Cantisano de Deus Silva
Priscila Monaro Bianchini
Erika Veruska Paiva Ortolan
Juliana Fattori Hamamoto
Rosemary Fermiano
Rebeca Mayara Padilha Rego
João César Lyra
Marc Alexander Benninga
Pedro Luiz Toledo de Arruda Lourenção
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02527-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pediatrics 1/2021 Go to the issue