Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study

Authors: Catherine Morgan, Iona Novak, Russell C Dale, Nadia Badawi

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The average age for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP) is 19 months. Recent neuroplasticity literature suggests that intensive, task-specific intervention ought to commence as early as possible and in an enriched environment, during the critical period of neural development. Active motor interventions are effective in some populations, however the effects of active motor interventions on the motor outcomes of infants with CP have not been researched thoroughly, but pilot work is promising. The aim of this study was to determine the short- term effects of “GAME”; a new and novel goal-oriented activity-based, environmental enrichment therapy programme on the motor development of infants at high risk of CP and test study procedures for a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods

Pragmatic 2-group pilot RCT to assess motor outcomes, goal attainment, parent well-being and home environment quality, after 12-weeks of GAME intervention versus standard care. GAME included: creation of movement environments to elicit motor behaviours; parent training in motor learning and task analysis; frequent practice of motor tasks using a programme that was individualised to the child, was varied and focused on self-initiated movement. Data were analyzed using multiple regression.

Results

Thirteen infants were consented, randomised, treated and completed the study. At study conclusion, the GAME group (n = 6) demonstrated an advantage in Total Motor Quotient of 8.05 points on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2 (PDMS-2) compared to the standard care group (n = 7) (p < .001). No significant differences existed between groups on any other measure.

Conclusions

GAME appears to offer a promising and feasible new motor intervention for CP, with favourable short-term motor outcomes. A pressing need exists for an adequately powered RCT with long-term end points, to determine if GAME may advance these children’s motor trajectory.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McIntyre S, Morgan C, Walker K, Novak I. Cerebral palsy – don’t delay. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2011;17:114–29.CrossRefPubMed McIntyre S, Morgan C, Walker K, Novak I. Cerebral palsy – don’t delay. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2011;17:114–29.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kolb B, Mychasiuk R, Williams P, Gibb R. Brain plasticity and recovery from early cortical injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:4–8.CrossRefPubMed Kolb B, Mychasiuk R, Williams P, Gibb R. Brain plasticity and recovery from early cortical injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:4–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Blauw-Hospers C, Hadders-Algra M. Systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:421–32.CrossRefPubMed Blauw-Hospers C, Hadders-Algra M. Systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:421–32.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Morgan C, Novak I, Badawi N. Enriched environments and motor outcomes in cerebral palsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e 735–e746.CrossRef Morgan C, Novak I, Badawi N. Enriched environments and motor outcomes in cerebral palsy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e 735–e746.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bosanquet M, Copeland L, Ware R, Boyd R. A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:418–26.CrossRefPubMed Bosanquet M, Copeland L, Ware R, Boyd R. A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:418–26.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Novak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, Campbell L, Dark L, Morton N, et al. State of the evidence: systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:885–910.CrossRefPubMed Novak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, Campbell L, Dark L, Morton N, et al. State of the evidence: systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:885–910.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Østenjo S, Øien I, Fallang B. Goal-oriented rehabilitation of preschoolers with cerebral palsy – a multi-case study of combined use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Dev Neurorehab. 2008;11:252–9.CrossRef Østenjo S, Øien I, Fallang B. Goal-oriented rehabilitation of preschoolers with cerebral palsy – a multi-case study of combined use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Dev Neurorehab. 2008;11:252–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, Wilson B, Russell D, Walter S, et al. Focus on function: a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing child-versus context-focused intervention for young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:621–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, Wilson B, Russell D, Walter S, et al. Focus on function: a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing child-versus context-focused intervention for young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:621–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Valvano J, Rapport M. Activity-focused motor interventions for infants and young children with neurological conditions. Infants Young Child. 2006;19:292–307.CrossRef Valvano J, Rapport M. Activity-focused motor interventions for infants and young children with neurological conditions. Infants Young Child. 2006;19:292–307.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fetters L. Perspective on variability in the development of human action. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1860–7.CrossRefPubMed Fetters L. Perspective on variability in the development of human action. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1860–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mahoney G, Perales F. The role of parents in early motor intervention. Downs Syndr Res Pract. 2006;10:67–73.CrossRefPubMed Mahoney G, Perales F. The role of parents in early motor intervention. Downs Syndr Res Pract. 2006;10:67–73.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dirks T, Hadders-Algra M. The role of the family in intervention of infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a systematic analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:62–7.CrossRefPubMed Dirks T, Hadders-Algra M. The role of the family in intervention of infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a systematic analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:62–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Feeley N, Cossette S, Côté J, Héon M, Stremler R, Martorella G, et al. The importance of piloting an RCT intervention. Can J Nurs Res. 2009;41:84–99. Feeley N, Cossette S, Côté J, Héon M, Stremler R, Martorella G, et al. The importance of piloting an RCT intervention. Can J Nurs Res. 2009;41:84–99.
15.
go back to reference Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Guzzetta A, Badawi N. GAME (Goals-Activity-Motor Enrichment): protocol of a single blind randomised controlled trial of motor training, parent education and environmental enrichment for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, Guzzetta A, Badawi N. GAME (Goals-Activity-Motor Enrichment): protocol of a single blind randomised controlled trial of motor training, parent education and environmental enrichment for infants at high risk of cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Novak I, Cusick A, Lannin N. Occupational therapy home programs for cerebral palsy: double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;124:e606–14. Novak I, Cusick A, Lannin N. Occupational therapy home programs for cerebral palsy: double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;124:e606–14.
17.
go back to reference Shepherd R. Cerebral palsy in infancy: targeted activity to optimize early growth and development. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2013. Shepherd R. Cerebral palsy in infancy: targeted activity to optimize early growth and development. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2013.
18.
go back to reference Lobo M, Galloway C. The onset of reaching significantly impacts how infants explore both objects and their bodies. Infant Behav Dev. 2013;26:14–24.CrossRef Lobo M, Galloway C. The onset of reaching significantly impacts how infants explore both objects and their bodies. Infant Behav Dev. 2013;26:14–24.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, Gorter J. Goal attainment scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:550–6.CrossRefPubMed Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, Gorter J. Goal attainment scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:550–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Palisano R, Haley S, Brown D. Goal attainment scaling as a measure of change in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1992;72:432–7.PubMed Palisano R, Haley S, Brown D. Goal attainment scaling as a measure of change in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1992;72:432–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Palisano R. Validity of goal attainment scaling in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1993;73:651–8.PubMed Palisano R. Validity of goal attainment scaling in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1993;73:651–8.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Carswell A, Mc Coll M, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The canadian occupational performance measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:210–22.CrossRefPubMed Carswell A, Mc Coll M, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The canadian occupational performance measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:210–22.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody developmental motor scales-‐2nd edition. 1974. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody developmental motor scales-‐2nd edition. 1974.
24.
go back to reference Palisano R, Kolobe T, Haley S, Pax Lowes L, Jones S. Validity of the peabody developmental gross motor scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1995;75:939–48.PubMed Palisano R, Kolobe T, Haley S, Pax Lowes L, Jones S. Validity of the peabody developmental gross motor scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1995;75:939–48.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Wang H, Liao H, Hsieh C. Reliability, sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the peabody developmental motor scales-second edition for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1351–9.CrossRefPubMed Wang H, Liao H, Hsieh C. Reliability, sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the peabody developmental motor scales-second edition for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1351–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Totsika V, Sylva K. The home observation for measurement of the environment revisited. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2004;9:25–35.CrossRef Totsika V, Sylva K. The home observation for measurement of the environment revisited. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2004;9:25–35.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Elardo R, Bradley R, Caldwell BM. The relation of infants’ home environments to mental test performance from six to thirty-six months: a longitudinal analysis. Child Dev. 1975;46:71–6.CrossRef Elardo R, Bradley R, Caldwell BM. The relation of infants’ home environments to mental test performance from six to thirty-six months: a longitudinal analysis. Child Dev. 1975;46:71–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Caldwell BM, Bradley RH. Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 1984. Caldwell BM, Bradley RH. Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 1984.
29.
30.
go back to reference Gorter J, Ketelaar M, Rosenbaum P, Helders P, Palisano R. Use of the GMFCS in infants with CP: the need for reclassification at age 2 years or older. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:46–52.CrossRefPubMed Gorter J, Ketelaar M, Rosenbaum P, Helders P, Palisano R. Use of the GMFCS in infants with CP: the need for reclassification at age 2 years or older. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:46–52.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
32.
go back to reference Gabbard C, Cacola P, Rodrigues L. A new inventory for assessing Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development (AHEMD-SR). Early Childhood Educ J. 2008;36:5–9.CrossRef Gabbard C, Cacola P, Rodrigues L. A new inventory for assessing Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development (AHEMD-SR). Early Childhood Educ J. 2008;36:5–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Evans T, Whittingham K, Boyd R. What helps the mother of a preterm infant become securely attached, responsive and well adjusted? Infant Behav Dev. 2011;35:1–11.CrossRefPubMed Evans T, Whittingham K, Boyd R. What helps the mother of a preterm infant become securely attached, responsive and well adjusted? Infant Behav Dev. 2011;35:1–11.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Metadata
Title
Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study
Authors
Catherine Morgan
Iona Novak
Russell C Dale
Nadia Badawi
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0347-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Pediatrics 1/2015 Go to the issue