Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Intrasession repeatability of pupil size measurements under different light levels provided by a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes

Authors: David P. Piñero, Dolores de Fez, Inmaculada Cabezos, Alberto López-Navarro, María T. Caballero, Vicente J. Camps

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The measurement of the pupillary function is an indispensable test in some eye examinations, being necessary the evaluation of the precision of instruments performing such measures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intrasession repeatability of pupil size measurements provided by a multidiagnostic platform in a large sample of healthy eyes.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 100 healthy eyes of 100 patients, with ages ranging from 23 to 65 years old. Repeated pupil size measures under photopic (P, 220 lx), mesopic (M, 160 lx), low mesopic (L, 70 lx), and scotopic conditions (S, 1 lx) were obtained with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies, Chartres, France) after a complete eye exam. Likewise, pupil size was also measured once in the fellow eye in a total of 75 eyes. The level of intrasession variability as well as differences between fellow eyes were evaluated.

Results

Most of differences between repeated measures did not exceed 0.5 mm (82% of S and 100% of P below this value). No significant differences between these repeated measures were found for S (p = 0.099) and L (p = 0.751). However, statistically significant differences were found between repeated measures for M (p = 0.002) and P (p = 0.003). The analysis of clinical relevance of differences between pairs (Passing-Bablok) only confirmed the clinical relevance of differences between the first and second repeated measurement of M. Concerning the comparative analysis between fellow eyes, no statistically significant differences in pupil size were found between right and left eyes in any light condition evaluated (p ≥ 0.227).

Conclusions

The VX120 system can provide consistent measurements of pupil size under scotopic, low mesopic and photopic conditions, with a relative limitation under mesopic conditions.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Robl C, Sliesoraityte I, Hillenkamp J, Prahs P, Lohmann CP, Helbig H, Herrmann WA. Repeated pupil size measurements in refractive surgery candidates. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:2099–102.CrossRef Robl C, Sliesoraityte I, Hillenkamp J, Prahs P, Lohmann CP, Helbig H, Herrmann WA. Repeated pupil size measurements in refractive surgery candidates. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:2099–102.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tekin K, Sekeroglu MA, Kiziltoprak H, Doguizi S, Inanc M, Yilmazbas P. Static and dynamic pupillometry data of healthy individuals. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101:659–65.CrossRef Tekin K, Sekeroglu MA, Kiziltoprak H, Doguizi S, Inanc M, Yilmazbas P. Static and dynamic pupillometry data of healthy individuals. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101:659–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maldonado MJ, López-Miguel A, Piñero DP, Juberías JR, Nieto JC, Alió JL. Can we measure mesopic pupil size with the cobalt blue light slit-lamp biomicroscopy method? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:1637–47.CrossRef Maldonado MJ, López-Miguel A, Piñero DP, Juberías JR, Nieto JC, Alió JL. Can we measure mesopic pupil size with the cobalt blue light slit-lamp biomicroscopy method? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:1637–47.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schallenberg M, Bangre V, Steuhl KP, Kremmer S, Selbach JM. Comparison of the Colvard, Procyon, and Neuroptics pupillometers for measuring pupil diameter under low ambient illumination. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:134–43.CrossRef Schallenberg M, Bangre V, Steuhl KP, Kremmer S, Selbach JM. Comparison of the Colvard, Procyon, and Neuroptics pupillometers for measuring pupil diameter under low ambient illumination. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:134–43.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wickremasinghe SS, Smith GT, Stevens JD. Comparison of dynamic digital pupillometry and static measurements of pupil size in determining scotopic pupil size before refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1171–6.CrossRef Wickremasinghe SS, Smith GT, Stevens JD. Comparison of dynamic digital pupillometry and static measurements of pupil size in determining scotopic pupil size before refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1171–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kohnen T, Terzi E, Bühren J, Kohnen EM. Comparison of a digital and handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:112–7.CrossRef Kohnen T, Terzi E, Bühren J, Kohnen EM. Comparison of a digital and handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:112–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Starck T, Liu Y, Prewett AL, Curup LG. Comparison of scotopic pupil measurement with slitlamp-based cobalt blue light and infrared video-based system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1952–6.CrossRef Starck T, Liu Y, Prewett AL, Curup LG. Comparison of scotopic pupil measurement with slitlamp-based cobalt blue light and infrared video-based system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1952–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Boxer Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Agreement and repeatability of pupillometry using videokeratography and infrared devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:35–40.CrossRef Boxer Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Agreement and repeatability of pupillometry using videokeratography and infrared devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:35–40.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boxer Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Agreement and repeatability of infrared pupillometry and the comparison method. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:319–23.CrossRef Boxer Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Agreement and repeatability of infrared pupillometry and the comparison method. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:319–23.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gordon-Shaag A, Piñero DP, Kahloun C, Markov D, Parnes T, Gantz L, Shneor E. Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120). J Optom. 2018;11:242–51.CrossRef Gordon-Shaag A, Piñero DP, Kahloun C, Markov D, Parnes T, Gantz L, Shneor E. Validation of refraction and anterior segment parameters by a new multi-diagnostic platform (VX120). J Optom. 2018;11:242–51.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sanchez I, Ortiz-Toquero S, Martin R. Intrasession Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility Measurements Using VX120 Multidiagnostic Unit. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 2):S266–72.CrossRef Sanchez I, Ortiz-Toquero S, Martin R. Intrasession Repeatability and Intersession Reproducibility Measurements Using VX120 Multidiagnostic Unit. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 2):S266–72.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Piñero DP, Cabezos I, López-Navarro A, de Fez D, Caballero MT, Camps VJ. Intrasession repeatability of ocular anatomical measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:193.CrossRef Piñero DP, Cabezos I, López-Navarro A, de Fez D, Caballero MT, Camps VJ. Intrasession repeatability of ocular anatomical measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:193.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intrasession repeatability of pupil size measurements under different light levels provided by a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes
Authors
David P. Piñero
Dolores de Fez
Inmaculada Cabezos
Alberto López-Navarro
María T. Caballero
Vicente J. Camps
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01625-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020 Go to the issue