Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Cancer
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

The role of nature in cancer patients' lives: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Author: Sarah Blaschke

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A systematic review and meta-synthesis was conducted to identify, compare and synthesize the published qualitative literature contributing to our understanding of the role of nature in cancer patients’ lives.

Method

An electronic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Databases was conducted to identify qualitative studies focused on cancer patients’ nature experiences published between January 1985 and May 2015. Records were assessed according to pre-defined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study characteristics and evaluated using the COREQ guidelines for comprehensive quality reporting. Qualitative data from ‘results’ and ‘findings’ sections were entered into data management software NVivo in order to identify recurring themes and facilitate interpretation across studies.

Results

From 11 eligible publications, seven inter-related core themes with descriptive themes were identified as follows: connecting with what is valued; being elsewhere, seeing and feeling differently; exploration, inner and outer excursions; home and safe; symbolism, understanding and communicating differently; benefitting from old and new physical activities; and, enriching aesthetic experiences.

Conclusions

Nature provides patients with unburdened physical and psychic space invested with personal significance. Findings propose nature’s role as a “secure base” offering patients a familiar and nurturing context from which new perspectives can emerge and caring connections can be made with themselves, others, the past, and the future. As such, nature supported patients to navigate the clinical and personal consequences of cancer. Comprehensive representation of cancer patients’ nature experiences identified patient values and care opportunities embedded in clinical and personal environments, which may be considered for future research and care service development.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Haluza D, Schonbauer R, Cervinka R. Green perspectives for public health: a narrative review on the physiological effects of experiencing outdoor nature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(5):5445–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Devlin AS, Arneill AB. Health care environments and patient outcomes: a review of the literature. Environment & Behavior. 2003;35(5):665–94.CrossRef
5.
Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu XM, DuBose J, Seo HB, Choi YS, et al. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Herd-Health Env Res Des J. 2008;1(3):61–125.
6.
Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, St Leger L. Healthy nature healthy people. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(1):45–54.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Maas J, Verheij RA, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P, Schellevis FG, Groenewegen PP. Morbidity is related to a green living environment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63(12):967–73.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Ulrich R. View through a window may influence recovery. Science. 1984;224(4647):224–5.CrossRef
9.
Wichrowski M, Whiteson J, Haas F, Mola A, Rey MJ. Effects of horticultural therapy on mood and heart rate in patients participating in an inpatient cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program. J Cardiopulm Rehab Prev. 2005;25(5):270–4.CrossRef
10.
11.
Rowlands J, Noble S. How does the environment impact on the quality of life of advanced cancer patients? A qualitative study with implications for ward design. Palliat Med. 2008;22(6):768–74.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Cimprich B, Ronis DL. An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2003;26(4):284–92.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Stevens B, Kagan S, Yamada J, Epstein I, Beamer M, Bilodeau M, et al. Adventure therapy for adolescents with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;43(3):278–84.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Saadatmand V, Rejeh N, Heravi-Karimooi M, Tadrisi SD, Zayeri F, Vaismoradi M, et al. Effect of nature-based sounds’ intervention on agitation, anxiety, and stress in patients under mechanical ventilator support: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(7):895–904.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environ Health Prev Med. 2010;15(1):18–26.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Korszun A, Sarker SJ, Chowdhury K, Clark C, Greaves P, Johnson R, et al. Psychosocial factors associated with impact of cancer in longterm haematological cancer survivors. Br J Haematol. 2014;164(6):790–803.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P. The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer. 2000;88(1):226–37.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Butow PN, Phillips F, Schweder J, White K, Underhill C, Goldstein D. Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(1):1–22.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Ray H, Jakubec SL. Nature-based experiences and health of cancer survivors. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014;20(4):188–92.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M. Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(10):1342–65.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Jensen LA, Allen MN. Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qual Health Res. 1996;6(4):553–60.CrossRef
23.
Hammell KW. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(2):124–39.CrossRef
24.
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer Publication Company; 2007.
25.
Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, Teasell R. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):595–602.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
27.
28.
Butterfield. Resilient Places? Healthcare gardens and the Maggie's Centres. PhD thesis. University of the Arts London and Falmouth University; 2014.
29.
Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:365–72.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Whitehouse S, Varni JW, Seid M, Cooper-Marcus C, Ensberg MJ, Jacobs JR, et al. Evaluating a children's hospital garden environment: utilization and consumer satisfaction. J Environ Psychol. 2001;21(3):301–14.CrossRef
31.
Mitchell T, Nielsen E. Living life to the limits: Dragon boaters and breast cancer. Can Womens Stud. 2002;21(3):50.
32.
Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2010;(12):1736-43.
33.
Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(4):671–84.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985.
35.
36.
37.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, Bennett L, Bernhardt J. Stroke survivors' experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(9):1698-708.
39.
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis Software. Version 10. Doncaster: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2014.
40.
Unruh AM, editor The meaning of gardens and gardening in daily life: A comparison between gardeners with serious health problems and healthy participants. XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Expanding Roles for Horticulture in Improving Human Well-Being and Life Quality 639; 2002.
41.
Unruh A, Hutchinson S. Embedded spirituality: gardening in daily life and stressful life experiences. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25(3):567–74.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Strauss A, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications; 1990.
43.
Blair CK, Madan-Swain A, Locher JL, Desmond RA, de Los SJ, Affuso O, et al. Harvest for health gardening intervention feasibility study in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(6):1110–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Ray HA, Verhoef MJ. Dragon boat racing and health-related quality of life of breast cancer survivors: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13(1):205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Spees KC, Joseph A, Darragh A, Lyons F, Wolf NK. Health behaviors and perceptions of cancer survivors harvesting at an urban garden. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(2):257–66.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Unruh AM, Smith N, Scammell C. The occupation of gardening in life-threatening illness: a qualitative pilot project. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67(1):70–7.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, 2013.
48.
Nakau M, Imanishi J, Imanishi J, Watanabe S, Imanishi A, Baba T, et al. Spiritual care of cancer patients by integrated medicine in urban green space: a pilot study. Exp Dermatol. 2013;9(2):87–90.
49.
Fried GG, Wichrowski MJ. Horticultural therapy: a psychosocial treatment option at the Stephen D. Hassenfeld Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders. Primary psychiatry. 2008;15(7):73–7.
50.
Wynn B, Frost A, Pawson P. Adventure therapy proves successful for adolescent survivors of childhood cancers. Nursing New Zealand (Wellington, NZ: 1995). 2012;18(1):28.
51.
Young-Mason J. Hope in bloom: a living tribute to friendship and courage. Clinical Nurse Specialist. 2008;22(5):251.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Jankovic M, Loiacono NB, Spinetta JJ, Riva L, Conter V, Masera C. Telling young children with leukemia their diagnosis: the flower garden as analogy. Pediatric Hematology-Oncology. 1994;11(1):75–81.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Taft SB. The use of therapeutic horticulture in cancer support. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture. 2007;18
54.
English J, Wilson K, Keller-Olaman S. Health, healing and recovery: therapeutic landscapes and the everyday lives of breast cancer survivors. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(1):68–78.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Pascal J. Space, place, and psychosocial well-being: Women's experience of breast cancer at an environmental retreat. Illness, Crisis, & Loss. 2010;18(3):201–16.CrossRef
56.
Baker P, Beesley H, Fletcher I, Ablett J, Holcombe C, Salmon P. ‘Getting back to normal ’or ‘a new type of normal’? A qualitative study of patients' responses to the existential threat of cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2016;25(1):180-9.
57.
Bowlby J. Clinical applications of attachment: a secure base. London: Routlege; 1988. p. 85.
58.
Isaksson J, Salander P, Granström B, Laurell G. Critical incidents reveal how patients with head and neck cancer construct their “secure base” as a “helping system”. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(3):322–41.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Salander P. Cancer and "playing" with reality: clinical guidance with the help of the intermediate area and disavowal. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2012;51(4):541.CrossRef
60.
Winnicott DW. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock Publications; 1971.
61.
Sandelowski M, Leeman J. Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1404–13.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ British Medical Journal. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Bailey CA. A guide to qualitative field research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press; 2007.
64.
Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(12):829–40.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The role of nature in cancer patients' lives: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
Author
Sarah Blaschke
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3366-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Cancer 1/2017 Go to the issue

Case report

Case report: whole exome sequencing of primary cardiac angiosarcoma highlights potential for targeted therapies

Research article

Pathologic analysis of non-neoplastic parenchyma in renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive observation in radical nephrectomy specimens

Review

A comprehensive overview on the surgical management of secondary lymphedema of the upper and lower extremities related to prior oncologic therapies

Research article

Propensity score matching analysis of a phase II study on simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy using helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinomas

Research article

Improved anticancer drug response prediction in cell lines using matrix factorization with similarity regularization

Research article

Topoisomerase I copy number alterations as biomarker for irinotecan efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits