Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Investigating young women’s motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional study

Authors: Nanon H. M. Labrie, Ramona Ludolph, Peter J. Schulz

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The scientific and public debate concerning organized mammography screening is unprecedentedly strong. With research evidence concerning its efficacy being ambiguous, the recommendations pertaining to the age-thresholds for program inclusion vary between – and even within – countries. Data shows that young women who are not yet eligible for systematic screening, have opportunistic mammograms relatively often and, moreover, want to be included in organized programs. Yet, to date, little is known about the precise motivations underlying young women’s desire and intentions to go for, not medically indicated, mammographic screening.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was carried out among women aged 30-49 years (n = 918) from Switzerland.

Results

The findings show that high fear (β = .08, p ≤ .05), perceived susceptibility (β = .10, p ≤ .05), and ego-involvement (β = .34, p ≤ .001) are the main predictors of screening intentions among women who are not yet eligible for the systematic program. Also, geographical location (Swiss-French group: β = .15, p ≤ .001; Swiss-Italian group: β = .26, p ≤ .001) and age (β = .11, p ≤ .001) play a role. In turn, breast cancer knowledge, risk perceptions, and educational status do not have a significant impact.

Conclusions

Young women seem to differ inherently from those who are already eligible for systematic screening in terms of the factors underlying their intentions to engage in mammographic screening. Thus, when striving to promote adherence to systematic screening guidelines – whether based on unequivocal scientific evidence or policy decisions – and to allow women to make evidence-based, informed decisions about mammography, differential strategies are needed to reach different age-groups.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Randomised screening trial. BMJ. 2014;348:g366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Randomised screening trial. BMJ. 2014;348:g366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I, Hacker A, Noftz MR, Katalinic A. Conclusions for mammography screening after 25-year follow-up of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study (CNBSS). Eur Radiol. 2015;26(2):1-9. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Schreer I, Hacker A, Noftz MR, Katalinic A. Conclusions for mammography screening after 25-year follow-up of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study (CNBSS). Eur Radiol. 2015;26(2):1-9.
3.
go back to reference Kopans DB. Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science. Oncol. 2014;19(2):107–12.CrossRef Kopans DB. Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science. Oncol. 2014;19(2):107–12.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kopans DB. An open letter to panels that are deciding guidelines for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2015;151(1):19–25.CrossRef Kopans DB. An open letter to panels that are deciding guidelines for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2015;151(1):19–25.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yaffe MJ. Point: Mammography screening—sticking to the science. Cur Oncol. 2015;22(3):174.CrossRef Yaffe MJ. Point: Mammography screening—sticking to the science. Cur Oncol. 2015;22(3):174.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Bouvard V, Bianchini F, Straif K. Breast-cancer screening—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Eng J Med. 2015;372(24):2353–8.CrossRef Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Bouvard V, Bianchini F, Straif K. Breast-cancer screening—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Eng J Med. 2015;372(24):2353–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Library. 2013. Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Library. 2013.
9.
go back to reference Perry N, Broeders M, De Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, Von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. —summary document. An Oncol. 2008;19(4):614–22.CrossRef Perry N, Broeders M, De Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, Von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. —summary document. An Oncol. 2008;19(4):614–22.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schulz PJ, Meuffels B. “It is about our body, our own body!”: On the difficulty of telling dutch women under 50 that mammography is not for them. J Argumentation Context. 2012;1(1):130–42.CrossRef Schulz PJ, Meuffels B. “It is about our body, our own body!”: On the difficulty of telling dutch women under 50 that mammography is not for them. J Argumentation Context. 2012;1(1):130–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schulz PJ, Meuffels B. Justifying age thresholds for mammographic screening: an application of pragma-dialectical argumentation theory. Health Commun. 2012;27(2):167–78.CrossRefPubMed Schulz PJ, Meuffels B. Justifying age thresholds for mammographic screening: an application of pragma-dialectical argumentation theory. Health Commun. 2012;27(2):167–78.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schulz PJ, Meuffels B. Differential appraisal of age thresholds for mammographic screening in Holland and Switzerland. J Commun Healthc. 2015;8(1):32–44.CrossRef Schulz PJ, Meuffels B. Differential appraisal of age thresholds for mammographic screening in Holland and Switzerland. J Commun Healthc. 2015;8(1):32–44.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kapp JM, Ryerson AB, Coughlin SS, Thompson TD. Racial and ethnic differences in mammography use among US women younger than age 40. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2009;113(2):327–37.CrossRef Kapp JM, Ryerson AB, Coughlin SS, Thompson TD. Racial and ethnic differences in mammography use among US women younger than age 40. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2009;113(2):327–37.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Block LD, Jarlenski MP, Wu AW, Bennett WL. Mammography use among women ages 40–49 after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(11):1447–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Block LD, Jarlenski MP, Wu AW, Bennett WL. Mammography use among women ages 40–49 after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(11):1447–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Achat H, Close G, Taylor R. Who has regular mammograms? Effects of knowledge, beliefs, socioeconomic status, and health-related factors. Prev Med. 2005;41(1):312–20.CrossRefPubMed Achat H, Close G, Taylor R. Who has regular mammograms? Effects of knowledge, beliefs, socioeconomic status, and health-related factors. Prev Med. 2005;41(1):312–20.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol. 1994;13(2):122.CrossRefPubMed Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol. 1994;13(2):122.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rutledge DN, Barsevick A, Knobf MT, Bookbinder M. Breast cancer detection: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of women from Pennsylvania. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28(6):1032–40.PubMed Rutledge DN, Barsevick A, Knobf MT, Bookbinder M. Breast cancer detection: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of women from Pennsylvania. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28(6):1032–40.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R. Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Womens Health. 2008;17(9):1477–98.CrossRef Schueler KM, Chu PW, Smith-Bindman R. Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature. J Womens Health. 2008;17(9):1477–98.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nekhlyudov L, Ross-Degnan D, Fletcher SW. Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(3):182–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nekhlyudov L, Ross-Degnan D, Fletcher SW. Beliefs and expectations of women under 50 years old regarding screening mammography. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(3):182–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference McCance KL, Mooney KH, Smith KR, Field R. Validity and reliability of a breast cancer knowledge test. Am J Prev Med. 1989;6(2):93–8. McCance KL, Mooney KH, Smith KR, Field R. Validity and reliability of a breast cancer knowledge test. Am J Prev Med. 1989;6(2):93–8.
27.
go back to reference Stager JL. The comprehensive breast cancer knowledge test: validity and reliability. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18(7):1133–40.CrossRefPubMed Stager JL. The comprehensive breast cancer knowledge test: validity and reliability. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18(7):1133–40.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Champion VL, et al. A breast cancer fear scale: Psychometric development. J Health Psychol. 2004;9(6):753–62.CrossRefPubMed Champion VL, et al. A breast cancer fear scale: Psychometric development. J Health Psychol. 2004;9(6):753–62.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Daly MB, Lerman CL, Ross E, Schwartz MD, Sands CB, Masny A. Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behavior. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 1996;41(1):59–70.CrossRef Daly MB, Lerman CL, Ross E, Schwartz MD, Sands CB, Masny A. Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behavior. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 1996;41(1):59–70.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC, Dodd MJ. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2004;38(4):388–402.CrossRefPubMed Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC, Dodd MJ. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2004;38(4):388–402.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Champion VL. Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nurs Res. 1993;42(3):139–43.CrossRefPubMed Champion VL. Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nurs Res. 1993;42(3):139–43.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Champion VL, Scott CR. Reliability and validity of breast cancer screening belief scales in African American women. Nurs Res. 1997;46(6):331–7.CrossRefPubMed Champion VL, Scott CR. Reliability and validity of breast cancer screening belief scales in African American women. Nurs Res. 1997;46(6):331–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Zaichkowsky JL. Measuring the involvement construct. J Consum Res. 1985: 341-352. Zaichkowsky JL. Measuring the involvement construct. J Consum Res. 1985: 341-352.
34.
go back to reference Zaichkowsky JL. The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. J Advert. 1994;23(4):59–70.CrossRef Zaichkowsky JL. The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. J Advert. 1994;23(4):59–70.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Raffle AE, Gray JAM. Screening: evidence and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.CrossRef Raffle AE, Gray JAM. Screening: evidence and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer I. 2010;102(9):605–13.CrossRef Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer I. 2010;102(9):605–13.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ahmed F, Mahmud S, Hatcher J, Khan SM. Breast cancer risk factor knowledge among nurses in teaching hospitals of Karachi Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2006;5(1):6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahmed F, Mahmud S, Hatcher J, Khan SM. Breast cancer risk factor knowledge among nurses in teaching hospitals of Karachi Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2006;5(1):6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Madanat H, Merrill RM. Breast cancer risk-factor and screening awareness among women nurses and teachers in Amman Jordan. Cancer Nurs. 2002;25(4):276–82.CrossRefPubMed Madanat H, Merrill RM. Breast cancer risk-factor and screening awareness among women nurses and teachers in Amman Jordan. Cancer Nurs. 2002;25(4):276–82.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Investigating young women’s motivations to engage in early mammography screening in Switzerland: results of a cross-sectional study
Authors
Nanon H. M. Labrie
Ramona Ludolph
Peter J. Schulz
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3180-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Cancer 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine